Cargando…

Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study

The mismatch response (MMR) is thought to be a neurophysiological measure of novel auditory detection that could serve as a translational biomarker of various neurological diseases. When recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG), the MMR is traditionally extracted by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsubara, Teppei, Stufflebeam, Steven, Khan, Sheraz, Ahveninen, Jyrki, Hämäläinen, Matti, Goto, Yoshinobu, Maekawa, Toshihiko, Tobimatsu, Shozo, Kishida, Kuniharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.762497
_version_ 1784668306500747264
author Matsubara, Teppei
Stufflebeam, Steven
Khan, Sheraz
Ahveninen, Jyrki
Hämäläinen, Matti
Goto, Yoshinobu
Maekawa, Toshihiko
Tobimatsu, Shozo
Kishida, Kuniharu
author_facet Matsubara, Teppei
Stufflebeam, Steven
Khan, Sheraz
Ahveninen, Jyrki
Hämäläinen, Matti
Goto, Yoshinobu
Maekawa, Toshihiko
Tobimatsu, Shozo
Kishida, Kuniharu
author_sort Matsubara, Teppei
collection PubMed
description The mismatch response (MMR) is thought to be a neurophysiological measure of novel auditory detection that could serve as a translational biomarker of various neurological diseases. When recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG), the MMR is traditionally extracted by subtracting the event-related potential/field (ERP/ERF) elicited in response to “deviant” sounds that occur randomly within a train of repetitive “standard” sounds. However, there are several problems with such a subtraction, which include increased noise and the neural adaptation problem. On the basis of the original theory underlying MMR (i.e., the memory-comparison process), the MMR should be present only in deviant epochs. Therefore, we proposed a novel method called weighted-BSS(T/k), which uses only the deviant response to derive the MMR. Deviant concatenation and weight assignment are the primary procedures of weighted-BSS(T/k), which maximize the benefits of time-delayed correlation. We hypothesized that this novel weighted-BSS(T/k) method highlights responses related to the detection of the deviant stimulus and is more sensitive than independent component analysis (ICA). To test this hypothesis and the validity and efficacy of the weighted-BSS(T/k) in comparison with ICA (infomax), we evaluated the methods in 12 healthy adults. Auditory stimuli were presented at a constant rate of 2 Hz. Frequency MMRs at a sensor level were obtained from the bilateral temporal lobes with the subtraction approach at 96–276 ms (the MMR time range), defined based on spatio-temporal cluster permutation analysis. In the application of the weighted-BSS(T/k), the deviant responses were given a constant weight using a rectangular window on the MMR time range. The ERF elicited by the weighted deviant responses demonstrated one or a few dominant components representing the MMR that fitted well with that of the sensor space analysis using the conventional subtraction approach. In contrast, infomax or weighted-infomax revealed many minor or pseudo components as constituents of the MMR. Our single-trial, contrast-free approach may assist in using the MMR in basic and clinical research, and it opens a new and potentially useful way to analyze event-related MEG/EEG data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8916481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89164812022-03-12 Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study Matsubara, Teppei Stufflebeam, Steven Khan, Sheraz Ahveninen, Jyrki Hämäläinen, Matti Goto, Yoshinobu Maekawa, Toshihiko Tobimatsu, Shozo Kishida, Kuniharu Front Neurol Neurology The mismatch response (MMR) is thought to be a neurophysiological measure of novel auditory detection that could serve as a translational biomarker of various neurological diseases. When recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG), the MMR is traditionally extracted by subtracting the event-related potential/field (ERP/ERF) elicited in response to “deviant” sounds that occur randomly within a train of repetitive “standard” sounds. However, there are several problems with such a subtraction, which include increased noise and the neural adaptation problem. On the basis of the original theory underlying MMR (i.e., the memory-comparison process), the MMR should be present only in deviant epochs. Therefore, we proposed a novel method called weighted-BSS(T/k), which uses only the deviant response to derive the MMR. Deviant concatenation and weight assignment are the primary procedures of weighted-BSS(T/k), which maximize the benefits of time-delayed correlation. We hypothesized that this novel weighted-BSS(T/k) method highlights responses related to the detection of the deviant stimulus and is more sensitive than independent component analysis (ICA). To test this hypothesis and the validity and efficacy of the weighted-BSS(T/k) in comparison with ICA (infomax), we evaluated the methods in 12 healthy adults. Auditory stimuli were presented at a constant rate of 2 Hz. Frequency MMRs at a sensor level were obtained from the bilateral temporal lobes with the subtraction approach at 96–276 ms (the MMR time range), defined based on spatio-temporal cluster permutation analysis. In the application of the weighted-BSS(T/k), the deviant responses were given a constant weight using a rectangular window on the MMR time range. The ERF elicited by the weighted deviant responses demonstrated one or a few dominant components representing the MMR that fitted well with that of the sensor space analysis using the conventional subtraction approach. In contrast, infomax or weighted-infomax revealed many minor or pseudo components as constituents of the MMR. Our single-trial, contrast-free approach may assist in using the MMR in basic and clinical research, and it opens a new and potentially useful way to analyze event-related MEG/EEG data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8916481/ /pubmed/35280282 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.762497 Text en Copyright © 2022 Matsubara, Stufflebeam, Khan, Ahveninen, Hämäläinen, Goto, Maekawa, Tobimatsu and Kishida. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Matsubara, Teppei
Stufflebeam, Steven
Khan, Sheraz
Ahveninen, Jyrki
Hämäläinen, Matti
Goto, Yoshinobu
Maekawa, Toshihiko
Tobimatsu, Shozo
Kishida, Kuniharu
Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title_full Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title_fullStr Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title_full_unstemmed Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title_short Weighted Blind Source Separation Can Decompose the Frequency Mismatch Response by Deviant Concatenation: An MEG Study
title_sort weighted blind source separation can decompose the frequency mismatch response by deviant concatenation: an meg study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.762497
work_keys_str_mv AT matsubarateppei weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT stufflebeamsteven weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT khansheraz weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT ahveninenjyrki weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT hamalainenmatti weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT gotoyoshinobu weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT maekawatoshihiko weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT tobimatsushozo weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy
AT kishidakuniharu weightedblindsourceseparationcandecomposethefrequencymismatchresponsebydeviantconcatenationanmegstudy