Cargando…

Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a significant global health threat since January 2020. Policies to reduce human mobility have been recognized to effectively control the spread of COVID-19; although the relationship between mobility, policy implementation, and virus spread remains contentious, with n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uthman, Olalekan A., Adetokunboh, Olatunji O., Wiysonge, Charles Shey, Al-Awlaqi, Sameh, Hanefeld, Johanna, El Bcheraoui, Charbel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.769174
_version_ 1784668323430006784
author Uthman, Olalekan A.
Adetokunboh, Olatunji O.
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Al-Awlaqi, Sameh
Hanefeld, Johanna
El Bcheraoui, Charbel
author_facet Uthman, Olalekan A.
Adetokunboh, Olatunji O.
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Al-Awlaqi, Sameh
Hanefeld, Johanna
El Bcheraoui, Charbel
author_sort Uthman, Olalekan A.
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a significant global health threat since January 2020. Policies to reduce human mobility have been recognized to effectively control the spread of COVID-19; although the relationship between mobility, policy implementation, and virus spread remains contentious, with no clear pattern for how countries classify each other, and determine the destinations to- and from which to restrict travel. In this rapid review, we identified country classification schemes for high-risk COVID-19 areas and associated policies which mirrored the dynamic situation in 2020, with the aim of identifying any patterns that could indicate the effectiveness of such policies. We searched academic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. We also consulted web pages of the relevant government institutions in all countries. This rapid review's searches were conducted between October 2020 and December 2021. Web scraping of policy documents yielded additional 43 country reports on high-risk area classification schemes. In 43 countries from which relevant reports were identified, six issued domestic classification schemes. International classification schemes were issued by the remaining 38 countries, and these mainly used case incidence per 100,000 inhabitants as key indicator. The case incidence cut-off also varied across the countries, ranging from 20 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the past 7 days to more than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the past 28 days. The criteria used for defining high-risk areas varied across countries, including case count, positivity rate, composite risk scores, community transmission and satisfactory laboratory testing. Countries either used case incidence in the past 7, 14 or 28 days. The resulting policies included restrictions on internal movement and international travel. The quarantine policies can be summarized into three categories: (1) 14 days self-isolation, (2) 10 days self-isolation and (3) 14 days compulsory isolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8916531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89165312022-03-12 Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review Uthman, Olalekan A. Adetokunboh, Olatunji O. Wiysonge, Charles Shey Al-Awlaqi, Sameh Hanefeld, Johanna El Bcheraoui, Charbel Front Public Health Public Health The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a significant global health threat since January 2020. Policies to reduce human mobility have been recognized to effectively control the spread of COVID-19; although the relationship between mobility, policy implementation, and virus spread remains contentious, with no clear pattern for how countries classify each other, and determine the destinations to- and from which to restrict travel. In this rapid review, we identified country classification schemes for high-risk COVID-19 areas and associated policies which mirrored the dynamic situation in 2020, with the aim of identifying any patterns that could indicate the effectiveness of such policies. We searched academic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. We also consulted web pages of the relevant government institutions in all countries. This rapid review's searches were conducted between October 2020 and December 2021. Web scraping of policy documents yielded additional 43 country reports on high-risk area classification schemes. In 43 countries from which relevant reports were identified, six issued domestic classification schemes. International classification schemes were issued by the remaining 38 countries, and these mainly used case incidence per 100,000 inhabitants as key indicator. The case incidence cut-off also varied across the countries, ranging from 20 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the past 7 days to more than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the past 28 days. The criteria used for defining high-risk areas varied across countries, including case count, positivity rate, composite risk scores, community transmission and satisfactory laboratory testing. Countries either used case incidence in the past 7, 14 or 28 days. The resulting policies included restrictions on internal movement and international travel. The quarantine policies can be summarized into three categories: (1) 14 days self-isolation, (2) 10 days self-isolation and (3) 14 days compulsory isolation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8916531/ /pubmed/35284361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.769174 Text en Copyright © 2022 Uthman, Adetokunboh, Wiysonge, Al-Awlaqi, Hanefeld and El Bcheraoui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Uthman, Olalekan A.
Adetokunboh, Olatunji O.
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Al-Awlaqi, Sameh
Hanefeld, Johanna
El Bcheraoui, Charbel
Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title_full Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title_fullStr Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title_full_unstemmed Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title_short Classification Schemes of COVID-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies: A Rapid Review
title_sort classification schemes of covid-19 high risk areas and resulting policies: a rapid review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.769174
work_keys_str_mv AT uthmanolalekana classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview
AT adetokunboholatunjio classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview
AT wiysongecharlesshey classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview
AT alawlaqisameh classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview
AT hanefeldjohanna classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview
AT elbcheraouicharbel classificationschemesofcovid19highriskareasandresultingpoliciesarapidreview