Cargando…

Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the 1‐year persistence to methotrexate (MTX) initiated as the first ever conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug in new‐onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the marginal gains and robustness of the results by in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Park, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11352
_version_ 1784668328407597056
author Park, Elizabeth
author_facet Park, Elizabeth
author_sort Park, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the 1‐year persistence to methotrexate (MTX) initiated as the first ever conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug in new‐onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the marginal gains and robustness of the results by increasing the number and nature of covariates and by using data‐driven, instead of hypothesis‐based, methods to predict this persistence. METHODS: Through the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register, linked to other data sources, we identified a cohort of 5475 patients with new‐onset RA in 2006‐2016 who were starting MTX monotherapy as their first disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug. Data on phenotype at diagnosis and demographics were combined with increasingly detailed data on medical disease history and medication use in four increasingly complex data sets (48‐4162 covariates). We performed manual model building using logistic regression. We also performed five different machine learning (ML) methods and combined the ML results into an ensemble model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and made calibration plots. We trained on 90% of the data, and tested the models on a holdout data set. RESULTS: Of the 5475 patients, 3834 (70%) remained on MTX monotherapy 1 year after treatment start. Clinical RA disease activity and baseline characteristics were most strongly associated with the outcome. The best manual model had an AUROC of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60‐0.71). For the ML methods, Lasso regression performed best (AUROC = 0.67; 95% CI 0.62‐0.71). CONCLUSION: Approximately two thirds of patients with early RA who start MTX remain on this therapy 1 year later. Predicting this persistence remains a challenge, whether using hypothesis‐based or ML models, and may yet require additional types of data. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/acr2.11266 Westerlind H, Maciejewski M, Frisell T, Jelinsky SA, Ziemek D, Askling J. What is the persistence to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and does machine learning outperform hypothesis‐based approaches to its prediction? ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:457‐463.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8916553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89165532022-03-18 Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?" Park, Elizabeth ACR Open Rheumatol Journal Club OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the 1‐year persistence to methotrexate (MTX) initiated as the first ever conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug in new‐onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the marginal gains and robustness of the results by increasing the number and nature of covariates and by using data‐driven, instead of hypothesis‐based, methods to predict this persistence. METHODS: Through the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register, linked to other data sources, we identified a cohort of 5475 patients with new‐onset RA in 2006‐2016 who were starting MTX monotherapy as their first disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug. Data on phenotype at diagnosis and demographics were combined with increasingly detailed data on medical disease history and medication use in four increasingly complex data sets (48‐4162 covariates). We performed manual model building using logistic regression. We also performed five different machine learning (ML) methods and combined the ML results into an ensemble model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and made calibration plots. We trained on 90% of the data, and tested the models on a holdout data set. RESULTS: Of the 5475 patients, 3834 (70%) remained on MTX monotherapy 1 year after treatment start. Clinical RA disease activity and baseline characteristics were most strongly associated with the outcome. The best manual model had an AUROC of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60‐0.71). For the ML methods, Lasso regression performed best (AUROC = 0.67; 95% CI 0.62‐0.71). CONCLUSION: Approximately two thirds of patients with early RA who start MTX remain on this therapy 1 year later. Predicting this persistence remains a challenge, whether using hypothesis‐based or ML models, and may yet require additional types of data. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/acr2.11266 Westerlind H, Maciejewski M, Frisell T, Jelinsky SA, Ziemek D, Askling J. What is the persistence to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and does machine learning outperform hypothesis‐based approaches to its prediction? ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:457‐463. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8916553/ /pubmed/34854263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11352 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Journal Club
Park, Elizabeth
Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title_full Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title_fullStr Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title_full_unstemmed Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title_short Journal Club Review of "What Is the Persistence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Does Machine Learning Outperform Hypothesis‐Based Approaches to Its Prediction?"
title_sort journal club review of "what is the persistence to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and does machine learning outperform hypothesis‐based approaches to its prediction?"
topic Journal Club
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11352
work_keys_str_mv AT parkelizabeth journalclubreviewofwhatisthepersistencetomethotrexateinrheumatoidarthritisanddoesmachinelearningoutperformhypothesisbasedapproachestoitsprediction