Cargando…
Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis
BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest reduced humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have variable immunomodulatory effects, and limited data are available for all DMTs. We aimed to determine the impact of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103737 |
_version_ | 1784668399477981184 |
---|---|
author | Satyanarayan, Sammita Safi, Neha Sorets, Tali Filomena, Susan Zhang, Yinan Klineova, Sylvia Fabian, Michelle Horng, Sam Tankou, Stephanie Miller, Aaron Krieger, Stephen Lublin, Fred Sumowski, James Katz Sand, Ilana |
author_facet | Satyanarayan, Sammita Safi, Neha Sorets, Tali Filomena, Susan Zhang, Yinan Klineova, Sylvia Fabian, Michelle Horng, Sam Tankou, Stephanie Miller, Aaron Krieger, Stephen Lublin, Fred Sumowski, James Katz Sand, Ilana |
author_sort | Satyanarayan, Sammita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest reduced humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have variable immunomodulatory effects, and limited data are available for all DMTs. We aimed to determine the impact of DMTs on antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination among MS patients. METHODS: Patients with documented COVID-19 vaccination dates and anti-spike antibody results post-vaccination were identified between March-August 2021. Clinical data were retrospectively abstracted from chart review. Deidentified data were analyzed to evaluate antibody response, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify clinical and demographic predictors of antibody response. Data analysis was completed with SAS Studio, v3.8. RESULTS: A total of 353 individuals had documented COVID-19 vaccine and antibody test dates (58% Pfizer, 38% Moderna, and 4% Johnson & Johnson). Of these 353 patients, 72% developed antibodies, with a mean antibody test interval of 53 days (median 46) post final vaccine dose. 100% of those on no DMT (n = 34), injectables (n = 20), teriflunomide (n = 10), natalizumab (n = 71), and 97.8% of those on fumarates (n = 46/47) had a positive antibody result. One patient on cladribine (n = 1) had a negative antibody result. Of those on sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) modulators, 72.4% (n = 21/29) had a positive antibody result. Of those on anti-CD20 therapies, 37.6% (n = 53/141) had a positive antibody result. Multivariate modeling of the total cohort showed anti-CD20 therapy was significantly associated with lower odds of positive antibody response (OR = 0.024, 95% CI 0.01;0.05, p < 0.0001). Among S1P modulators, increased duration of therapy, and not lymphopenia, may be associated with lower odds of positive antibody response. Multivariate modeling of anti-CD20 therapies showed therapy duration < 1 year (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.896;22.898 p < .0001) and prior COVID-19 infection (OR = 3.95, 95% CI 1.137;13.726, p = .03) were significantly associated with higher odds of a positive antibody response. In patients with recent B-cell data, mean B-cell count was higher in antibody-positive individuals compared to antibody-negative (32.9 vs. 3.9 cells, p = .0056). CONCLUSION: MS DMTs had variable impact on antibody response with mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines. All patients on no DMT, interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, and nearly all on fumarates had positive antibody responses post-vaccine. S1P modulators and anti-CD20 therapies attenuated antibody response post-vaccine. For patients on anti-CD20 therapies, shorter duration of therapy and prior COVID-19 infection predicted positive antibody response. Further studies are needed to determine clinical significance of antibody testing, development of cellular mediated immunity, and benefits of booster vaccinations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8916835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89168352022-03-14 Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis Satyanarayan, Sammita Safi, Neha Sorets, Tali Filomena, Susan Zhang, Yinan Klineova, Sylvia Fabian, Michelle Horng, Sam Tankou, Stephanie Miller, Aaron Krieger, Stephen Lublin, Fred Sumowski, James Katz Sand, Ilana Mult Scler Relat Disord Article BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest reduced humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have variable immunomodulatory effects, and limited data are available for all DMTs. We aimed to determine the impact of DMTs on antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination among MS patients. METHODS: Patients with documented COVID-19 vaccination dates and anti-spike antibody results post-vaccination were identified between March-August 2021. Clinical data were retrospectively abstracted from chart review. Deidentified data were analyzed to evaluate antibody response, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify clinical and demographic predictors of antibody response. Data analysis was completed with SAS Studio, v3.8. RESULTS: A total of 353 individuals had documented COVID-19 vaccine and antibody test dates (58% Pfizer, 38% Moderna, and 4% Johnson & Johnson). Of these 353 patients, 72% developed antibodies, with a mean antibody test interval of 53 days (median 46) post final vaccine dose. 100% of those on no DMT (n = 34), injectables (n = 20), teriflunomide (n = 10), natalizumab (n = 71), and 97.8% of those on fumarates (n = 46/47) had a positive antibody result. One patient on cladribine (n = 1) had a negative antibody result. Of those on sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) modulators, 72.4% (n = 21/29) had a positive antibody result. Of those on anti-CD20 therapies, 37.6% (n = 53/141) had a positive antibody result. Multivariate modeling of the total cohort showed anti-CD20 therapy was significantly associated with lower odds of positive antibody response (OR = 0.024, 95% CI 0.01;0.05, p < 0.0001). Among S1P modulators, increased duration of therapy, and not lymphopenia, may be associated with lower odds of positive antibody response. Multivariate modeling of anti-CD20 therapies showed therapy duration < 1 year (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.896;22.898 p < .0001) and prior COVID-19 infection (OR = 3.95, 95% CI 1.137;13.726, p = .03) were significantly associated with higher odds of a positive antibody response. In patients with recent B-cell data, mean B-cell count was higher in antibody-positive individuals compared to antibody-negative (32.9 vs. 3.9 cells, p = .0056). CONCLUSION: MS DMTs had variable impact on antibody response with mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines. All patients on no DMT, interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, and nearly all on fumarates had positive antibody responses post-vaccine. S1P modulators and anti-CD20 therapies attenuated antibody response post-vaccine. For patients on anti-CD20 therapies, shorter duration of therapy and prior COVID-19 infection predicted positive antibody response. Further studies are needed to determine clinical significance of antibody testing, development of cellular mediated immunity, and benefits of booster vaccinations. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-06 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8916835/ /pubmed/35533419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103737 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Satyanarayan, Sammita Safi, Neha Sorets, Tali Filomena, Susan Zhang, Yinan Klineova, Sylvia Fabian, Michelle Horng, Sam Tankou, Stephanie Miller, Aaron Krieger, Stephen Lublin, Fred Sumowski, James Katz Sand, Ilana Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title | Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title_full | Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title_short | Differential antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | differential antibody response to covid-19 vaccines across immunomodulatory therapies for multiple sclerosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT satyanarayansammita differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT safineha differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT soretstali differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT filomenasusan differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT zhangyinan differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT klineovasylvia differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT fabianmichelle differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT horngsam differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT tankoustephanie differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT milleraaron differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT kriegerstephen differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT lublinfred differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT sumowskijames differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis AT katzsandilana differentialantibodyresponsetocovid19vaccinesacrossimmunomodulatorytherapiesformultiplesclerosis |