Cargando…

A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nicotine pouches (NPs) are a relatively new type of oral smokeless tobacco-free nicotine product. Currently, few data are available on the nicotine pharmacokinetics or subjective effects of NP use. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokineti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McEwan, Michael, Azzopardi, David, Gale, Nathan, Camacho, Oscar M., Hardie, George, Fearon, Ian M., Murphy, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9
_version_ 1784668455113326592
author McEwan, Michael
Azzopardi, David
Gale, Nathan
Camacho, Oscar M.
Hardie, George
Fearon, Ian M.
Murphy, James
author_facet McEwan, Michael
Azzopardi, David
Gale, Nathan
Camacho, Oscar M.
Hardie, George
Fearon, Ian M.
Murphy, James
author_sort McEwan, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nicotine pouches (NPs) are a relatively new type of oral smokeless tobacco-free nicotine product. Currently, few data are available on the nicotine pharmacokinetics or subjective effects of NP use. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption into the blood from different NP variants and a combustible cigarette. METHODS: In a randomised, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects were compared among commercially available NPs (five different brands; 6–10 mg nicotine/pouch) and a combustible cigarette. During an 8-day confinement period, 35 healthy adult participants who were current dual users of snus and combustible cigarettes used one study product each day for a defined period following overnight nicotine abstinence. RESULTS: Nicotine maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between 0 and 6 h (AUC(0–6h)) were significantly greater for the Lyft 10 mg NP than for the cigarette (both p < 0.0001), while the other NPs had C(max) and AUC(0–6h) values that were either greater than or similar to those of the cigarette. Plasma nicotine concentration was not associated with the nicotine contents of the NPs. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) was higher for all NPs (60–65 min) than for the cigarette (7 min). Regarding subjective effects, liking and intent to use product again scores were higher for the cigarette than for any NP and were lowest for the NP with the lowest nicotine content. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insight into nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects during NP use, and demonstrates that NPs can provide nicotine in amounts sufficient to replicate cigarette smokers' nicotine uptake following a switch from conventional cigarettes to these potentially less harmful NP products. Further studies are required to ascertain how physical characteristics of NPs other than nicotine content may affect nicotine delivery, pharmacokinetics and subjective responses. ISRCTN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ISRCTN17828518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89170322022-03-17 A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette McEwan, Michael Azzopardi, David Gale, Nathan Camacho, Oscar M. Hardie, George Fearon, Ian M. Murphy, James Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nicotine pouches (NPs) are a relatively new type of oral smokeless tobacco-free nicotine product. Currently, few data are available on the nicotine pharmacokinetics or subjective effects of NP use. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption into the blood from different NP variants and a combustible cigarette. METHODS: In a randomised, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects were compared among commercially available NPs (five different brands; 6–10 mg nicotine/pouch) and a combustible cigarette. During an 8-day confinement period, 35 healthy adult participants who were current dual users of snus and combustible cigarettes used one study product each day for a defined period following overnight nicotine abstinence. RESULTS: Nicotine maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between 0 and 6 h (AUC(0–6h)) were significantly greater for the Lyft 10 mg NP than for the cigarette (both p < 0.0001), while the other NPs had C(max) and AUC(0–6h) values that were either greater than or similar to those of the cigarette. Plasma nicotine concentration was not associated with the nicotine contents of the NPs. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) was higher for all NPs (60–65 min) than for the cigarette (7 min). Regarding subjective effects, liking and intent to use product again scores were higher for the cigarette than for any NP and were lowest for the NP with the lowest nicotine content. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insight into nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects during NP use, and demonstrates that NPs can provide nicotine in amounts sufficient to replicate cigarette smokers' nicotine uptake following a switch from conventional cigarettes to these potentially less harmful NP products. Further studies are required to ascertain how physical characteristics of NPs other than nicotine content may affect nicotine delivery, pharmacokinetics and subjective responses. ISRCTN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ISRCTN17828518. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8917032/ /pubmed/34923602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
McEwan, Michael
Azzopardi, David
Gale, Nathan
Camacho, Oscar M.
Hardie, George
Fearon, Ian M.
Murphy, James
A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title_full A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title_fullStr A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title_full_unstemmed A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title_short A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette
title_sort randomised study to investigate the nicotine pharmacokinetics of oral nicotine pouches and a combustible cigarette
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcewanmichael arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT azzopardidavid arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT galenathan arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT camachooscarm arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT hardiegeorge arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT fearonianm arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT murphyjames arandomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT mcewanmichael randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT azzopardidavid randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT galenathan randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT camachooscarm randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT hardiegeorge randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT fearonianm randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette
AT murphyjames randomisedstudytoinvestigatethenicotinepharmacokineticsoforalnicotinepouchesandacombustiblecigarette