Cargando…

Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

In pair bonding animals, coordinated behavior between partners is required for the pair to accomplish shared goals such as raising young. Despite this, experimental designs rarely assess the behavior of both partners within a bonded pair. Thus, we lack an understanding of the interdependent behavior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brusman, Liza E., Protter, David S. W., Fultz, Allison C., Paulson, Maya U., Chapel, Gabriel D., Elges, Isaiah O., Cameron, Ryan T., Beery, Annaliese K., Donaldson, Zoe R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12786
_version_ 1784668460313214976
author Brusman, Liza E.
Protter, David S. W.
Fultz, Allison C.
Paulson, Maya U.
Chapel, Gabriel D.
Elges, Isaiah O.
Cameron, Ryan T.
Beery, Annaliese K.
Donaldson, Zoe R.
author_facet Brusman, Liza E.
Protter, David S. W.
Fultz, Allison C.
Paulson, Maya U.
Chapel, Gabriel D.
Elges, Isaiah O.
Cameron, Ryan T.
Beery, Annaliese K.
Donaldson, Zoe R.
author_sort Brusman, Liza E.
collection PubMed
description In pair bonding animals, coordinated behavior between partners is required for the pair to accomplish shared goals such as raising young. Despite this, experimental designs rarely assess the behavior of both partners within a bonded pair. Thus, we lack an understanding of the interdependent behavioral dynamics between partners that likely facilitate relationship success. To identify intra‐pair behavioral correlates of pair bonding, we used socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and tested both partners using social choice and non‐choice tests at short‐ and long‐term pairing timepoints. Females developed a preference for their partner more rapidly than males, with preference driven by different behaviors in each sex. Further, as bonds matured, intra‐pair behavioral sex differences and organized behavior emerged—females consistently huddled more with their partner than males did regardless of overall intra‐pair affiliation levels. When animals were allowed to freely interact with a partner or a novel vole in sequential free interaction tests, pairs spent more time interacting together than either animal did with a novel vole, consistent with partner preference in the more commonly employed choice test. Total pair interaction in freely moving voles was correlated with female, but not male, behavior. Via a social operant paradigm, we found that pair‐bonded females, but not males, are more motivated to access and huddle with their partner than a novel vole. Together, our data indicate that as pair bonds mature, sex differences and organized behavior emerge within pairs, and that these intra‐pair behavioral changes are likely organized and driven by the female animal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89170862022-03-12 Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Brusman, Liza E. Protter, David S. W. Fultz, Allison C. Paulson, Maya U. Chapel, Gabriel D. Elges, Isaiah O. Cameron, Ryan T. Beery, Annaliese K. Donaldson, Zoe R. Genes Brain Behav Original Articles In pair bonding animals, coordinated behavior between partners is required for the pair to accomplish shared goals such as raising young. Despite this, experimental designs rarely assess the behavior of both partners within a bonded pair. Thus, we lack an understanding of the interdependent behavioral dynamics between partners that likely facilitate relationship success. To identify intra‐pair behavioral correlates of pair bonding, we used socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and tested both partners using social choice and non‐choice tests at short‐ and long‐term pairing timepoints. Females developed a preference for their partner more rapidly than males, with preference driven by different behaviors in each sex. Further, as bonds matured, intra‐pair behavioral sex differences and organized behavior emerged—females consistently huddled more with their partner than males did regardless of overall intra‐pair affiliation levels. When animals were allowed to freely interact with a partner or a novel vole in sequential free interaction tests, pairs spent more time interacting together than either animal did with a novel vole, consistent with partner preference in the more commonly employed choice test. Total pair interaction in freely moving voles was correlated with female, but not male, behavior. Via a social operant paradigm, we found that pair‐bonded females, but not males, are more motivated to access and huddle with their partner than a novel vole. Together, our data indicate that as pair bonds mature, sex differences and organized behavior emerge within pairs, and that these intra‐pair behavioral changes are likely organized and driven by the female animal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8917086/ /pubmed/35044090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12786 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior published by International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brusman, Liza E.
Protter, David S. W.
Fultz, Allison C.
Paulson, Maya U.
Chapel, Gabriel D.
Elges, Isaiah O.
Cameron, Ryan T.
Beery, Annaliese K.
Donaldson, Zoe R.
Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title_full Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title_fullStr Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title_full_unstemmed Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title_short Emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
title_sort emergent intra‐pair sex differences and organized behavior in pair bonded prairie voles (microtus ochrogaster)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12786
work_keys_str_mv AT brusmanlizae emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT protterdavidsw emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT fultzallisonc emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT paulsonmayau emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT chapelgabrield emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT elgesisaiaho emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT cameronryant emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT beeryannaliesek emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster
AT donaldsonzoer emergentintrapairsexdifferencesandorganizedbehaviorinpairbondedprairievolesmicrotusochrogaster