Cargando…

Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement

The studies for astigmatism prediction error at different diameters using optical biometry are scant. We investigated patients who underwent cataract surgery with monofocal, nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) from 2017 through 2019 in a medical center. Patients with prior refractive surgeries, corneal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Yin-Hsi, Pu, Christy, Lin, Ken-Kuo, Lee, Jiahn-Shing, Hou, Chiun-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08253-6
_version_ 1784668467983548416
author Chang, Yin-Hsi
Pu, Christy
Lin, Ken-Kuo
Lee, Jiahn-Shing
Hou, Chiun-Ho
author_facet Chang, Yin-Hsi
Pu, Christy
Lin, Ken-Kuo
Lee, Jiahn-Shing
Hou, Chiun-Ho
author_sort Chang, Yin-Hsi
collection PubMed
description The studies for astigmatism prediction error at different diameters using optical biometry are scant. We investigated patients who underwent cataract surgery with monofocal, nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) from 2017 through 2019 in a medical center. Patients with prior refractive surgeries, corneal opacity, or surgical complications were excluded. Corneal astigmatism (CA) was measured using AL-Scan at 2.4- and 3.3-mm diameter zones and calculated using the Barrett toric calculator preoperatively and postoperatively. The mean absolute error and centroid prediction error for the two zones were computed using double-angle plots. In total, 101 eyes of 76 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 68.7 ± 9.3 years and mean preoperative CA power was 0.7 ± 0.5 D. The overall centroid prediction error a 3.3 mm (0.09 ± 0.58 D@25) was significantly lower than that at 2.4 mm (0.09 ± 0.68 D@87) on the X-axis (P = 0.003). The 3.3-mm measurement also had a lower centroid prediction error than the 2.4-mm did for eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) and oblique astigmatism (P = 0.024; 0.002 on X-axis, respectively). The 3.3-mm measurement provided a more accurate CA estimation than the 2.4-mm did, particularly for ATR astigmatism. Diameter zone and astigmatism type should be considered crucial to precise astigmatism calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89171192022-03-14 Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement Chang, Yin-Hsi Pu, Christy Lin, Ken-Kuo Lee, Jiahn-Shing Hou, Chiun-Ho Sci Rep Article The studies for astigmatism prediction error at different diameters using optical biometry are scant. We investigated patients who underwent cataract surgery with monofocal, nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) from 2017 through 2019 in a medical center. Patients with prior refractive surgeries, corneal opacity, or surgical complications were excluded. Corneal astigmatism (CA) was measured using AL-Scan at 2.4- and 3.3-mm diameter zones and calculated using the Barrett toric calculator preoperatively and postoperatively. The mean absolute error and centroid prediction error for the two zones were computed using double-angle plots. In total, 101 eyes of 76 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 68.7 ± 9.3 years and mean preoperative CA power was 0.7 ± 0.5 D. The overall centroid prediction error a 3.3 mm (0.09 ± 0.58 D@25) was significantly lower than that at 2.4 mm (0.09 ± 0.68 D@87) on the X-axis (P = 0.003). The 3.3-mm measurement also had a lower centroid prediction error than the 2.4-mm did for eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) and oblique astigmatism (P = 0.024; 0.002 on X-axis, respectively). The 3.3-mm measurement provided a more accurate CA estimation than the 2.4-mm did, particularly for ATR astigmatism. Diameter zone and astigmatism type should be considered crucial to precise astigmatism calculation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8917119/ /pubmed/35277574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08253-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chang, Yin-Hsi
Pu, Christy
Lin, Ken-Kuo
Lee, Jiahn-Shing
Hou, Chiun-Ho
Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title_full Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title_fullStr Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title_short Prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
title_sort prediction of residual astigmatism in cataract surgery at different diameter zones using optical biometry measurement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08253-6
work_keys_str_mv AT changyinhsi predictionofresidualastigmatismincataractsurgeryatdifferentdiameterzonesusingopticalbiometrymeasurement
AT puchristy predictionofresidualastigmatismincataractsurgeryatdifferentdiameterzonesusingopticalbiometrymeasurement
AT linkenkuo predictionofresidualastigmatismincataractsurgeryatdifferentdiameterzonesusingopticalbiometrymeasurement
AT leejiahnshing predictionofresidualastigmatismincataractsurgeryatdifferentdiameterzonesusingopticalbiometrymeasurement
AT houchiunho predictionofresidualastigmatismincataractsurgeryatdifferentdiameterzonesusingopticalbiometrymeasurement