Cargando…
The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200 |
_version_ | 1784668510765449216 |
---|---|
author | Goodyer, Elliot Mah, Jasmine C. Rangan, Apoorva Chitalu, Petronella Andrew, Melissa K. Searle, Samuel D. Davis, Daniel Tsui, Alex |
author_facet | Goodyer, Elliot Mah, Jasmine C. Rangan, Apoorva Chitalu, Petronella Andrew, Melissa K. Searle, Samuel D. Davis, Daniel Tsui, Alex |
author_sort | Goodyer, Elliot |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people, comparing a population sample and patients managed by a speciality acute frailty service. METHODS: We used the Delirium and Population Health Informatics Cohort, a population sample of 1510 individuals aged ≥70 years from the London Borough of Camden and 1750 acute frailty patients. SEP was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Linear and Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to assess SEP on frailty, readmission, and mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In the population sample, SEP was significantly associated with frailty and mortality with successive increases in rate of death for each IMD quintile (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.49, P < 0.005). Increasing SEP, age, and admission status among hospitalized individuals were associated with greater frailty. For individuals seen by the speciality frailty service, SEP was not associated with frailty, mortality, or readmission. DISCUSSION: When older people experience acute illness severe enough to require secondary care, particularly specialist services, this overcomes any prior advantages conferred by a higher SEP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8917265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89172652022-03-14 The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting Goodyer, Elliot Mah, Jasmine C. Rangan, Apoorva Chitalu, Petronella Andrew, Melissa K. Searle, Samuel D. Davis, Daniel Tsui, Alex Aging Med (Milton) Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people, comparing a population sample and patients managed by a speciality acute frailty service. METHODS: We used the Delirium and Population Health Informatics Cohort, a population sample of 1510 individuals aged ≥70 years from the London Borough of Camden and 1750 acute frailty patients. SEP was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Linear and Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to assess SEP on frailty, readmission, and mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In the population sample, SEP was significantly associated with frailty and mortality with successive increases in rate of death for each IMD quintile (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.49, P < 0.005). Increasing SEP, age, and admission status among hospitalized individuals were associated with greater frailty. For individuals seen by the speciality frailty service, SEP was not associated with frailty, mortality, or readmission. DISCUSSION: When older people experience acute illness severe enough to require secondary care, particularly specialist services, this overcomes any prior advantages conferred by a higher SEP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8917265/ /pubmed/35291504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Aging Medicine published by Beijing Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Goodyer, Elliot Mah, Jasmine C. Rangan, Apoorva Chitalu, Petronella Andrew, Melissa K. Searle, Samuel D. Davis, Daniel Tsui, Alex The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title | The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title_full | The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title_fullStr | The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title_full_unstemmed | The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title_short | The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
title_sort | relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodyerelliot therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT mahjasminec therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT ranganapoorva therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT chitalupetronella therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT andrewmelissak therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT searlesamueld therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT davisdaniel therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT tsuialex therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT goodyerelliot relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT mahjasminec relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT ranganapoorva relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT chitalupetronella relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT andrewmelissak relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT searlesamueld relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT davisdaniel relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting AT tsuialex relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting |