Cargando…

The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting

INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodyer, Elliot, Mah, Jasmine C., Rangan, Apoorva, Chitalu, Petronella, Andrew, Melissa K., Searle, Samuel D., Davis, Daniel, Tsui, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200
_version_ 1784668510765449216
author Goodyer, Elliot
Mah, Jasmine C.
Rangan, Apoorva
Chitalu, Petronella
Andrew, Melissa K.
Searle, Samuel D.
Davis, Daniel
Tsui, Alex
author_facet Goodyer, Elliot
Mah, Jasmine C.
Rangan, Apoorva
Chitalu, Petronella
Andrew, Melissa K.
Searle, Samuel D.
Davis, Daniel
Tsui, Alex
author_sort Goodyer, Elliot
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people, comparing a population sample and patients managed by a speciality acute frailty service. METHODS: We used the Delirium and Population Health Informatics Cohort, a population sample of 1510 individuals aged ≥70 years from the London Borough of Camden and 1750 acute frailty patients. SEP was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Linear and Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to assess SEP on frailty, readmission, and mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In the population sample, SEP was significantly associated with frailty and mortality with successive increases in rate of death for each IMD quintile (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.49, P < 0.005). Increasing SEP, age, and admission status among hospitalized individuals were associated with greater frailty. For individuals seen by the speciality frailty service, SEP was not associated with frailty, mortality, or readmission. DISCUSSION: When older people experience acute illness severe enough to require secondary care, particularly specialist services, this overcomes any prior advantages conferred by a higher SEP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89172652022-03-14 The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting Goodyer, Elliot Mah, Jasmine C. Rangan, Apoorva Chitalu, Petronella Andrew, Melissa K. Searle, Samuel D. Davis, Daniel Tsui, Alex Aging Med (Milton) Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Frailty and socioeconomic position (SEP) are well‐established determinants of health. However, we know less about the contributions of frailty and SEP in older adults, especially in acute settings. We set out to answer how frailty and SEP might influence health outcomes in older people, comparing a population sample and patients managed by a speciality acute frailty service. METHODS: We used the Delirium and Population Health Informatics Cohort, a population sample of 1510 individuals aged ≥70 years from the London Borough of Camden and 1750 acute frailty patients. SEP was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Linear and Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to assess SEP on frailty, readmission, and mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In the population sample, SEP was significantly associated with frailty and mortality with successive increases in rate of death for each IMD quintile (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.49, P < 0.005). Increasing SEP, age, and admission status among hospitalized individuals were associated with greater frailty. For individuals seen by the speciality frailty service, SEP was not associated with frailty, mortality, or readmission. DISCUSSION: When older people experience acute illness severe enough to require secondary care, particularly specialist services, this overcomes any prior advantages conferred by a higher SEP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8917265/ /pubmed/35291504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Aging Medicine published by Beijing Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Goodyer, Elliot
Mah, Jasmine C.
Rangan, Apoorva
Chitalu, Petronella
Andrew, Melissa K.
Searle, Samuel D.
Davis, Daniel
Tsui, Alex
The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title_full The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title_fullStr The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title_full_unstemmed The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title_short The relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
title_sort relative impact of socioeconomic position and frailty varies by population setting
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12200
work_keys_str_mv AT goodyerelliot therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT mahjasminec therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT ranganapoorva therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT chitalupetronella therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT andrewmelissak therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT searlesamueld therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT davisdaniel therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT tsuialex therelativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT goodyerelliot relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT mahjasminec relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT ranganapoorva relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT chitalupetronella relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT andrewmelissak relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT searlesamueld relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT davisdaniel relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting
AT tsuialex relativeimpactofsocioeconomicpositionandfrailtyvariesbypopulationsetting