Cargando…
Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, countries have adopted various degrees of restrictive measures on people to reduce COVID-19 transmission. These measures have had significant social and economic costs. In the absence of therapeutics, and low vaccination coverage, strategie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2 |
_version_ | 1784668526250819584 |
---|---|
author | Misra, Madhavi Joshi, Harsha Sarwal, Rakesh Rao, Krishna D. |
author_facet | Misra, Madhavi Joshi, Harsha Sarwal, Rakesh Rao, Krishna D. |
author_sort | Misra, Madhavi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, countries have adopted various degrees of restrictive measures on people to reduce COVID-19 transmission. These measures have had significant social and economic costs. In the absence of therapeutics, and low vaccination coverage, strategies for a safe exit plan from a lockdown are required to mitigate the transmission and simultaneously re-open societies. Most countries have outlined or have implemented lockdown exit plans. The objective of this scoping review is to (a) identify and map the different strategies for exit from lockdowns, (b) document the effects of these exit strategies, and (c) discuss features of successful exit strategies based on the evidence. METHODS: A five-step approach was used in this scoping review: (a) identifying the research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria; (b) searching the literature using keywords within PubMed and WHO databases; (c) study selection; (d) data extraction; (e) collating results and qualitative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: Of the 406 unique studies found, 107 were kept for full-text review. Studies suggest the post-peak period as optimal timing for an exit, supplemented by other triggers such as sufficient health system capacity, and increased testing rate. A controlled and step-wise exit plan which is flexible and guided by information from surveillance systems is optimal. Studies recommend continued use of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as physical distancing, use of facemasks, and hygiene measures, in different combinations when exiting from a lockdown, even after optimal vaccination coverage has been attained. CONCLUSION: Reviewed studies have suggested adopting a multi-pronged strategy consisting of different approaches depending on the context. Among the different exit strategies reviewed (phase-wise exit, hard exit, and constant cyclic patterns of lockdown), phase-wise exit appears to be the optimal exit strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8917328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89173282022-03-14 Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review Misra, Madhavi Joshi, Harsha Sarwal, Rakesh Rao, Krishna D. BMC Public Health Research INTRODUCTION: In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, countries have adopted various degrees of restrictive measures on people to reduce COVID-19 transmission. These measures have had significant social and economic costs. In the absence of therapeutics, and low vaccination coverage, strategies for a safe exit plan from a lockdown are required to mitigate the transmission and simultaneously re-open societies. Most countries have outlined or have implemented lockdown exit plans. The objective of this scoping review is to (a) identify and map the different strategies for exit from lockdowns, (b) document the effects of these exit strategies, and (c) discuss features of successful exit strategies based on the evidence. METHODS: A five-step approach was used in this scoping review: (a) identifying the research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria; (b) searching the literature using keywords within PubMed and WHO databases; (c) study selection; (d) data extraction; (e) collating results and qualitative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: Of the 406 unique studies found, 107 were kept for full-text review. Studies suggest the post-peak period as optimal timing for an exit, supplemented by other triggers such as sufficient health system capacity, and increased testing rate. A controlled and step-wise exit plan which is flexible and guided by information from surveillance systems is optimal. Studies recommend continued use of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as physical distancing, use of facemasks, and hygiene measures, in different combinations when exiting from a lockdown, even after optimal vaccination coverage has been attained. CONCLUSION: Reviewed studies have suggested adopting a multi-pronged strategy consisting of different approaches depending on the context. Among the different exit strategies reviewed (phase-wise exit, hard exit, and constant cyclic patterns of lockdown), phase-wise exit appears to be the optimal exit strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8917328/ /pubmed/35279102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Misra, Madhavi Joshi, Harsha Sarwal, Rakesh Rao, Krishna D. Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title | Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title_full | Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title_short | Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review |
title_sort | exit strategies from lockdowns due to covid-19: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12845-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT misramadhavi exitstrategiesfromlockdownsduetocovid19ascopingreview AT joshiharsha exitstrategiesfromlockdownsduetocovid19ascopingreview AT sarwalrakesh exitstrategiesfromlockdownsduetocovid19ascopingreview AT raokrishnad exitstrategiesfromlockdownsduetocovid19ascopingreview |