Cargando…
Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility?
Waste management is notably absent from current discussions about efforts to improve access to diagnostics in low-and middle-income Countries (LMICs). Yet an increase in testing will inevitably lead to an increase in diagnostic waste, especially since many of the diagnostic tests designed for use in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00823-7 |
_version_ | 1784668535757209600 |
---|---|
author | Street, Alice Vernooij, Eva Rogers, Mohamed Hashim |
author_facet | Street, Alice Vernooij, Eva Rogers, Mohamed Hashim |
author_sort | Street, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | Waste management is notably absent from current discussions about efforts to improve access to diagnostics in low-and middle-income Countries (LMICs). Yet an increase in testing will inevitably lead to an increase in diagnostic waste, especially since many of the diagnostic tests designed for use in LMICs are single-use point-of-care tests. Diagnostic waste poses a threat to both human and environmental health. In this commentary we draw on our experience of diagnostic waste management in Sierra Leone and review current evidence on: the volume and impact of diagnostic waste in LMICs, existing health-care waste management capacity in LMICs, established national and international policies for improving health-care waste management, and opportunities for strengthening policy in this area. We argue that questions of safe disposal for diagnostics should not be an afterthought, only posed once questions of access have already been addressed. Moreover, responsibility for safe disposal of diagnostic waste should not fall solely on national health systems by default. Instead, consideration of the end-life of diagnostic products must be fully integrated into the diagnostic access agenda and greater pressure should be placed on manufacturers to take responsibility for the full life-cycle of their products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8917373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89173732022-03-14 Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? Street, Alice Vernooij, Eva Rogers, Mohamed Hashim Global Health Commentary Waste management is notably absent from current discussions about efforts to improve access to diagnostics in low-and middle-income Countries (LMICs). Yet an increase in testing will inevitably lead to an increase in diagnostic waste, especially since many of the diagnostic tests designed for use in LMICs are single-use point-of-care tests. Diagnostic waste poses a threat to both human and environmental health. In this commentary we draw on our experience of diagnostic waste management in Sierra Leone and review current evidence on: the volume and impact of diagnostic waste in LMICs, existing health-care waste management capacity in LMICs, established national and international policies for improving health-care waste management, and opportunities for strengthening policy in this area. We argue that questions of safe disposal for diagnostics should not be an afterthought, only posed once questions of access have already been addressed. Moreover, responsibility for safe disposal of diagnostic waste should not fall solely on national health systems by default. Instead, consideration of the end-life of diagnostic products must be fully integrated into the diagnostic access agenda and greater pressure should be placed on manufacturers to take responsibility for the full life-cycle of their products. BioMed Central 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8917373/ /pubmed/35279191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00823-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Street, Alice Vernooij, Eva Rogers, Mohamed Hashim Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title | Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title_full | Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title_short | Diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
title_sort | diagnostic waste: whose responsibility? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00823-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT streetalice diagnosticwastewhoseresponsibility AT vernooijeva diagnosticwastewhoseresponsibility AT rogersmohamedhashim diagnosticwastewhoseresponsibility |