Cargando…

Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy

PURPOSE: To assess the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and study the effect of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) on the accuracy of formulas using optic biometry. METHODS: This study was performed on 164 e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambade, Ajay K, Ambade, Rakhee A, Raje, Dhananjay V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937222
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_31_21
_version_ 1784668587349245952
author Ambade, Ajay K
Ambade, Rakhee A
Raje, Dhananjay V
author_facet Ambade, Ajay K
Ambade, Rakhee A
Raje, Dhananjay V
author_sort Ambade, Ajay K
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and study the effect of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) on the accuracy of formulas using optic biometry. METHODS: This study was performed on 164 eyes of 164 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Ocular biometry values were measured using Lenstar-900, and intraocular lens (IOL) power was calculated using the SRK/T, SRK II, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II formulas. We evaluated the extent of bias within each formula for different ocular biometric measurements and explored the relationship between the prediction error and the ocular parameters by using various IOL formulas. RESULTS: The summarization of refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error for each IOL formulation was performed after adjusting the mean refractive error to zero. The deviation in the error values was minimum for SRK/T (0.265) followed by Holladay 2 (0.327) and Barret (0.382). Further, SRK/T had the lowest median (0.15) and mean (0.198) absolute error as compared to other formulations. For the above formulations, 100% of the eyes were in the diopter range of ±1.0. It was observed that the overall distribution of error was closer to zero for SRK/T, followed by Holladay 2 and then Barrett. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found that accuracy was better in SRK/T formula. We achieved a better understanding of how each variable in the formulas is relatively weighed and the influencing factors in the refraction prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89176152022-03-13 Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy Ambade, Ajay K Ambade, Rakhee A Raje, Dhananjay V Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and study the effect of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) on the accuracy of formulas using optic biometry. METHODS: This study was performed on 164 eyes of 164 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Ocular biometry values were measured using Lenstar-900, and intraocular lens (IOL) power was calculated using the SRK/T, SRK II, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II formulas. We evaluated the extent of bias within each formula for different ocular biometric measurements and explored the relationship between the prediction error and the ocular parameters by using various IOL formulas. RESULTS: The summarization of refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error for each IOL formulation was performed after adjusting the mean refractive error to zero. The deviation in the error values was minimum for SRK/T (0.265) followed by Holladay 2 (0.327) and Barret (0.382). Further, SRK/T had the lowest median (0.15) and mean (0.198) absolute error as compared to other formulations. For the above formulations, 100% of the eyes were in the diopter range of ±1.0. It was observed that the overall distribution of error was closer to zero for SRK/T, followed by Holladay 2 and then Barrett. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found that accuracy was better in SRK/T formula. We achieved a better understanding of how each variable in the formulas is relatively weighed and the influencing factors in the refraction prediction. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-01 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8917615/ /pubmed/34937222 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_31_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ambade, Ajay K
Ambade, Rakhee A
Raje, Dhananjay V
Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title_full Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title_fullStr Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title_short Refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
title_sort refractive prediction by various intraocular lens formulas using optical biometry and effect of ocular parameters on their accuracy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937222
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_31_21
work_keys_str_mv AT ambadeajayk refractivepredictionbyvariousintraocularlensformulasusingopticalbiometryandeffectofocularparametersontheiraccuracy
AT ambaderakheea refractivepredictionbyvariousintraocularlensformulasusingopticalbiometryandeffectofocularparametersontheiraccuracy
AT rajedhananjayv refractivepredictionbyvariousintraocularlensformulasusingopticalbiometryandeffectofocularparametersontheiraccuracy