Cargando…

An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations

A field experiment, using a paired audit testing design with testers of different racial and language profiles, was conducted to document and evaluate individual encounters in inquiring about COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. states. Testers communicated with state health department and major vaccin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinrich, Carolyn J., Camacho, Sayil, Binsted, Kaitlin, Gale, Shadlan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35364564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114880
_version_ 1784668594045452288
author Heinrich, Carolyn J.
Camacho, Sayil
Binsted, Kaitlin
Gale, Shadlan
author_facet Heinrich, Carolyn J.
Camacho, Sayil
Binsted, Kaitlin
Gale, Shadlan
author_sort Heinrich, Carolyn J.
collection PubMed
description A field experiment, using a paired audit testing design with testers of different racial and language profiles, was conducted to document and evaluate individual encounters in inquiring about COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. states. Testers communicated with state health department and major vaccination site staff about obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine and assessed the extent to which evidence-informed communication tactics for encouraging take-up were employed. The audit testers included individuals representing Latinx identities, given research showing they face greater hardships in navigating vaccine infrastructure and place less trust in public immunization efforts. Data were collected in phone and electronic communications between mid-June and mid-August of 2021. Empirical analyses confirmed that states vary considerably in how clearly officials communicate vaccination requirements and procedures, and in what they ask of individuals before providing the opportunity to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The Spanish-speaking tester was more likely to encounter negative or racialized language—primarily implicit in nature—such as calls abruptly ended (vs. attempting to secure language support) and requests for additional identification or personal information before continuing with vaccination registration. Examples of overtly negative or racist encounters included condescending comments about Latinx testers' identification (or perceived undocumented status) and the Spanish-speaking tester's communication in Spanish. Analysis of an index of good practices constructed from the audit data revealed that very few strategies for promoting vaccinations were regularly implemented. In regression analyses, an additional point on the good practices index predicted a 0.133 percentage point increase in the percent of the population receiving the first vaccine dose, suggesting the lack of implementation of these good practices may represent a missed opportunity to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates. We identified exemplars in the communications that the federal government could disseminate to rapidly improve state practices and the accessibility of accurate information on COVID-19 vaccination opportunities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89176472022-03-14 An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations Heinrich, Carolyn J. Camacho, Sayil Binsted, Kaitlin Gale, Shadlan Soc Sci Med Article A field experiment, using a paired audit testing design with testers of different racial and language profiles, was conducted to document and evaluate individual encounters in inquiring about COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. states. Testers communicated with state health department and major vaccination site staff about obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine and assessed the extent to which evidence-informed communication tactics for encouraging take-up were employed. The audit testers included individuals representing Latinx identities, given research showing they face greater hardships in navigating vaccine infrastructure and place less trust in public immunization efforts. Data were collected in phone and electronic communications between mid-June and mid-August of 2021. Empirical analyses confirmed that states vary considerably in how clearly officials communicate vaccination requirements and procedures, and in what they ask of individuals before providing the opportunity to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The Spanish-speaking tester was more likely to encounter negative or racialized language—primarily implicit in nature—such as calls abruptly ended (vs. attempting to secure language support) and requests for additional identification or personal information before continuing with vaccination registration. Examples of overtly negative or racist encounters included condescending comments about Latinx testers' identification (or perceived undocumented status) and the Spanish-speaking tester's communication in Spanish. Analysis of an index of good practices constructed from the audit data revealed that very few strategies for promoting vaccinations were regularly implemented. In regression analyses, an additional point on the good practices index predicted a 0.133 percentage point increase in the percent of the population receiving the first vaccine dose, suggesting the lack of implementation of these good practices may represent a missed opportunity to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates. We identified exemplars in the communications that the federal government could disseminate to rapidly improve state practices and the accessibility of accurate information on COVID-19 vaccination opportunities. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-05 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8917647/ /pubmed/35364564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114880 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Heinrich, Carolyn J.
Camacho, Sayil
Binsted, Kaitlin
Gale, Shadlan
An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title_full An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title_fullStr An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title_full_unstemmed An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title_short An audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting Covid-19 vaccinations
title_sort audit test evaluation of state practices for supporting access to and promoting covid-19 vaccinations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35364564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114880
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichcarolynj anaudittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT camachosayil anaudittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT binstedkaitlin anaudittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT galeshadlan anaudittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT heinrichcarolynj audittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT camachosayil audittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT binstedkaitlin audittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations
AT galeshadlan audittestevaluationofstatepracticesforsupportingaccesstoandpromotingcovid19vaccinations