Cargando…

Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: The efficiency of capecitabine has been proven in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) with residue invasive tumor (non-pCR) after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, for those unselected eTNBC patients without screening from NACT (i.e., newly diagnosed eTNBC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Feng, Bian, Lei, Wen, Jiahuai, Yu, Ping, Li, Na, Xie, Xiaoming, Wang, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09326-5
_version_ 1784668599898603520
author Ye, Feng
Bian, Lei
Wen, Jiahuai
Yu, Ping
Li, Na
Xie, Xiaoming
Wang, Xi
author_facet Ye, Feng
Bian, Lei
Wen, Jiahuai
Yu, Ping
Li, Na
Xie, Xiaoming
Wang, Xi
author_sort Ye, Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficiency of capecitabine has been proven in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) with residue invasive tumor (non-pCR) after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, for those unselected eTNBC patients without screening from NACT (i.e., newly diagnosed eTNBC patients undergoing breast surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy), the value of capecitabine has still remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether additional capecitabine in eTNBC patients could improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Seven RCTs (USO 01062, FinXX, GEICAM/2003, CREATE-X, CIBOMA/2004, CBCSG-010 and SYSUCC-001) were identified in online databases until December 2020 and included in the meta-analysis. We extracted the survival data including disease/relapse-free survival (DFS/RFS) and overall survival (OS), and utilized the STATA software to calculate the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). RESULTS: A total of 3329 eTNBC patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis, with 1640 receiving standard neo−/adjuvant chemo-regimes alone, and the other 1689 receiving an additional capecitabine use, respectively. Both DFS and OS were significantly improved with the addition of capecitabine, and the benefits remained consistent in those unselected eTNBC patients without screening from NACT. Subgroup analysis further proved that this improvement in DFS was significant in both nodal negative and positive patients. Similar benefits are also found across menopausal status (both pre- and post-menopause). Regarding toxicity, the hand-foot syndrome and neutropenia are the most common capecitabine related adverse events, and are mostly tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates for the first time that adding capecitabine to standard chemo-regimens could improve both DFS and OS in unselected eTNBC patients, and this benefit remains consistent regardless of nodal status and menopausal status, which may lead eTNBC therapy into a new era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8917675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89176752022-03-21 Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ye, Feng Bian, Lei Wen, Jiahuai Yu, Ping Li, Na Xie, Xiaoming Wang, Xi BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The efficiency of capecitabine has been proven in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) with residue invasive tumor (non-pCR) after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, for those unselected eTNBC patients without screening from NACT (i.e., newly diagnosed eTNBC patients undergoing breast surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy), the value of capecitabine has still remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether additional capecitabine in eTNBC patients could improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Seven RCTs (USO 01062, FinXX, GEICAM/2003, CREATE-X, CIBOMA/2004, CBCSG-010 and SYSUCC-001) were identified in online databases until December 2020 and included in the meta-analysis. We extracted the survival data including disease/relapse-free survival (DFS/RFS) and overall survival (OS), and utilized the STATA software to calculate the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). RESULTS: A total of 3329 eTNBC patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis, with 1640 receiving standard neo−/adjuvant chemo-regimes alone, and the other 1689 receiving an additional capecitabine use, respectively. Both DFS and OS were significantly improved with the addition of capecitabine, and the benefits remained consistent in those unselected eTNBC patients without screening from NACT. Subgroup analysis further proved that this improvement in DFS was significant in both nodal negative and positive patients. Similar benefits are also found across menopausal status (both pre- and post-menopause). Regarding toxicity, the hand-foot syndrome and neutropenia are the most common capecitabine related adverse events, and are mostly tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates for the first time that adding capecitabine to standard chemo-regimens could improve both DFS and OS in unselected eTNBC patients, and this benefit remains consistent regardless of nodal status and menopausal status, which may lead eTNBC therapy into a new era. BioMed Central 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8917675/ /pubmed/35279130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09326-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ye, Feng
Bian, Lei
Wen, Jiahuai
Yu, Ping
Li, Na
Xie, Xiaoming
Wang, Xi
Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8917675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35279130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09326-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yefeng additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bianlei additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wenjiahuai additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuping additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lina additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiexiaoming additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangxi additionalcapecitabineuseinearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsreceivingstandardchemotherapyaneweraametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials