Cargando…

Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region

The purpose of this study was to assess skin elasticity, the reduction in the number and the depth of wrinkles and changes in the other skin defects (bags under the eyes, dark circles under the eyes, skin hyperpigmentation in the ageing eye area following the use of non-ablative fractional laser, bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kołodziejczak, Anna, Rotsztejn, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33988812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03329-7
_version_ 1784668667532804096
author Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
author_facet Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
author_sort Kołodziejczak, Anna
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess skin elasticity, the reduction in the number and the depth of wrinkles and changes in the other skin defects (bags under the eyes, dark circles under the eyes, skin hyperpigmentation in the ageing eye area following the use of non-ablative fractional laser, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light). Moreover, the study was also comparison which device brought better results than the others. This study included 71 patients (66 women, 5 men), aged 33–63 years (the average age was 45.81 years) with skin phototypes II and III. Twenty-four patients received five treatment sessions with a 1410-nm non-ablative fractional laser in 2-week intervals, 23 patients received five treatment sessions with a bipolar radiofrequency in 1-week intervals and 24 patients received five treatment sessions with an intense pulsed light in 2-week intervals. The treatment was applied on the skin in the eye area. The Cutometer (Courage + Khazaka electronic) reference test was used as an objective method for the assessment of skin elasticity. A questionnaire was used to compare baseline state with changes that occurred after the series of treatment sessions. The results of cutometric measurements of R2, R6 and R7 parameters and the results of questionnaires indicated that non-ablative fractional laser therapy, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light improved skin elasticity. Of the three treatments, the most significant percentage improvement in the R6 parameter was demonstrated by non-ablative fractional laser therapy which gave better final results than the other methods (p < 0.0001). No other statistically significant relationships were found between RF and IPL. In the (subjective) opinion of study participants (questionnaire), all used methods resulted in the reduction of the amount and the depth of wrinkles. However, they did not observe significant impact of individual treatment method on the signs of skin ageing, including discolorations within eye area, bags (fatty hernia), dark circles (vascular/pigmentary) and oedema (predisposition to water retention). Non-ablative fractional laser therapy, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light improved skin elasticity and the reduction of wrinkles. The most significant improvement of elasticity was demonstrated by laser therapy. It seems necessary to expand the group with the effect of individual treatments against bags and dark circles under the eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8918123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89181232022-03-17 Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region Kołodziejczak, Anna Rotsztejn, Helena Lasers Med Sci Original Article The purpose of this study was to assess skin elasticity, the reduction in the number and the depth of wrinkles and changes in the other skin defects (bags under the eyes, dark circles under the eyes, skin hyperpigmentation in the ageing eye area following the use of non-ablative fractional laser, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light). Moreover, the study was also comparison which device brought better results than the others. This study included 71 patients (66 women, 5 men), aged 33–63 years (the average age was 45.81 years) with skin phototypes II and III. Twenty-four patients received five treatment sessions with a 1410-nm non-ablative fractional laser in 2-week intervals, 23 patients received five treatment sessions with a bipolar radiofrequency in 1-week intervals and 24 patients received five treatment sessions with an intense pulsed light in 2-week intervals. The treatment was applied on the skin in the eye area. The Cutometer (Courage + Khazaka electronic) reference test was used as an objective method for the assessment of skin elasticity. A questionnaire was used to compare baseline state with changes that occurred after the series of treatment sessions. The results of cutometric measurements of R2, R6 and R7 parameters and the results of questionnaires indicated that non-ablative fractional laser therapy, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light improved skin elasticity. Of the three treatments, the most significant percentage improvement in the R6 parameter was demonstrated by non-ablative fractional laser therapy which gave better final results than the other methods (p < 0.0001). No other statistically significant relationships were found between RF and IPL. In the (subjective) opinion of study participants (questionnaire), all used methods resulted in the reduction of the amount and the depth of wrinkles. However, they did not observe significant impact of individual treatment method on the signs of skin ageing, including discolorations within eye area, bags (fatty hernia), dark circles (vascular/pigmentary) and oedema (predisposition to water retention). Non-ablative fractional laser therapy, bipolar radiofrequency and intense pulsed light improved skin elasticity and the reduction of wrinkles. The most significant improvement of elasticity was demonstrated by laser therapy. It seems necessary to expand the group with the effect of individual treatments against bags and dark circles under the eyes. Springer London 2021-05-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8918123/ /pubmed/33988812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03329-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kołodziejczak, Anna
Rotsztejn, Helena
Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title_full Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title_fullStr Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title_short Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region
title_sort efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and ipl rejuvenation of periorbital region
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33988812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03329-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kołodziejczakanna efficacyoffractionallaserradiofrequencyandiplrejuvenationofperiorbitalregion
AT rotsztejnhelena efficacyoffractionallaserradiofrequencyandiplrejuvenationofperiorbitalregion