Cargando…
Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
The periocular region is challenging for cosmetic laser surgeons. Surgery and laser resurfacing have traditionally been used to correct periorbital lines and wrinkles. Although effective, the associated downtime with these methods has made many people reluctant to decide for such treatments. More re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03362-6 |
_version_ | 1784668668014100480 |
---|---|
author | Badawi, Ashraf Sobeih, Tarek Jasmina, Vesel |
author_facet | Badawi, Ashraf Sobeih, Tarek Jasmina, Vesel |
author_sort | Badawi, Ashraf |
collection | PubMed |
description | The periocular region is challenging for cosmetic laser surgeons. Surgery and laser resurfacing have traditionally been used to correct periorbital lines and wrinkles. Although effective, the associated downtime with these methods has made many people reluctant to decide for such treatments. More recently, the non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser is being used to improve the structure and function and hence the appearance of skin in the periorbital region. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser for non-ablative treatment of periorbital static wrinkles and skin laxity. This is a prospective analysis of 30 patients treated for periorbital rejuvenation using three sessions of non-ablative long-pulse Er:YAG laser over a 3-month period. All patients were assessed according to Fitzpatrick’s classification of periorbital wrinkles to class I, II, or III and were treated with 2940 nm Er:YAG laser using a fluence of 3.75 J/cm(2), a repetition rate of 1.7–2 Hz, and with the SMOOTH™ pulse mode (250 ms). The treatment sessions were performed on each patient, 4 weeks apart. Patient improvement was assessed before each laser session as well as at 12 months after the final treatment. Blind photographic evaluations were performed by three independent physicians using unlabeled before and after photos arranged in non-chronological order. Reviewers were asked to determine the before and after photos. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire measuring satisfaction 4 weeks after each session, and to report any adverse reactions. There was statistically and clinically significant improvement in the Fitzpatrick classification of the periorbital wrinkles. Blinded evaluators correctly identified the before and after photos in all cases. All patients reported mild edema and erythema, which persisted for 1 to 2 days, and superficial peeling of the skin for 4 to 6 days after each laser treatment. No long-term adverse effects were reported. The non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser seems to be a safe and effective treatment for periocular rejuvenation with minimal and tolerable adverse reaction. The improvement attained from the laser sessions was persisting after 1 year denoting the long-term efficacy of the procedure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10103-021-03362-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8918125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89181252022-03-17 Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser Badawi, Ashraf Sobeih, Tarek Jasmina, Vesel Lasers Med Sci Original Article The periocular region is challenging for cosmetic laser surgeons. Surgery and laser resurfacing have traditionally been used to correct periorbital lines and wrinkles. Although effective, the associated downtime with these methods has made many people reluctant to decide for such treatments. More recently, the non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser is being used to improve the structure and function and hence the appearance of skin in the periorbital region. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser for non-ablative treatment of periorbital static wrinkles and skin laxity. This is a prospective analysis of 30 patients treated for periorbital rejuvenation using three sessions of non-ablative long-pulse Er:YAG laser over a 3-month period. All patients were assessed according to Fitzpatrick’s classification of periorbital wrinkles to class I, II, or III and were treated with 2940 nm Er:YAG laser using a fluence of 3.75 J/cm(2), a repetition rate of 1.7–2 Hz, and with the SMOOTH™ pulse mode (250 ms). The treatment sessions were performed on each patient, 4 weeks apart. Patient improvement was assessed before each laser session as well as at 12 months after the final treatment. Blind photographic evaluations were performed by three independent physicians using unlabeled before and after photos arranged in non-chronological order. Reviewers were asked to determine the before and after photos. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire measuring satisfaction 4 weeks after each session, and to report any adverse reactions. There was statistically and clinically significant improvement in the Fitzpatrick classification of the periorbital wrinkles. Blinded evaluators correctly identified the before and after photos in all cases. All patients reported mild edema and erythema, which persisted for 1 to 2 days, and superficial peeling of the skin for 4 to 6 days after each laser treatment. No long-term adverse effects were reported. The non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser seems to be a safe and effective treatment for periocular rejuvenation with minimal and tolerable adverse reaction. The improvement attained from the laser sessions was persisting after 1 year denoting the long-term efficacy of the procedure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10103-021-03362-6. Springer London 2021-06-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8918125/ /pubmed/34146192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03362-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Badawi, Ashraf Sobeih, Tarek Jasmina, Vesel Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser |
title | Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
|
title_full | Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
|
title_fullStr | Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
|
title_full_unstemmed | Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
|
title_short | Periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm Er:YAG laser
|
title_sort | periocular rejuvenation using a unique non-ablative long-pulse 2940 nm er:yag laser |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03362-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badawiashraf periocularrejuvenationusingauniquenonablativelongpulse2940nmeryaglaser AT sobeihtarek periocularrejuvenationusingauniquenonablativelongpulse2940nmeryaglaser AT jasminavesel periocularrejuvenationusingauniquenonablativelongpulse2940nmeryaglaser |