Cargando…
Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods
In the arthropod model species Drosophila melanogaster, a dipteran fly, segmentation of the anterior–posterior body axis is under control of a hierarchic gene cascade. Segmental boundaries that form morphological grooves are established posteriorly within the segmental expression domain of the segme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35038005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-022-00684-5 |
_version_ | 1784668670378639360 |
---|---|
author | Janssen, Ralf Turetzek, Natascha Pechmann, Matthias |
author_facet | Janssen, Ralf Turetzek, Natascha Pechmann, Matthias |
author_sort | Janssen, Ralf |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the arthropod model species Drosophila melanogaster, a dipteran fly, segmentation of the anterior–posterior body axis is under control of a hierarchic gene cascade. Segmental boundaries that form morphological grooves are established posteriorly within the segmental expression domain of the segment-polarity gene (SPG) engrailed (en). More important for the development of the fly, however, are the parasegmental boundaries that are established at the interface of en expressing cells and anteriorly adjacent wingless (wg) expressing cells. In Drosophila, both segmental and transient parasegmental grooves form. The latter are positioned anterior to the expression of en. Although the function of the SPGs in establishing and maintaining segmental and parasegmental boundaries is highly conserved among arthropods, parasegmental grooves have only been reported for Drosophila, and a spider (Cupiennius salei). Here, we present new data on en expression, and re-evaluate published data, from four distantly related spiders, including Cupiennius, and a distantly related chelicerate, the harvestman Phalangium opilio. Gene expression analysis of en genes in these animals does not corroborate the presence of parasegmental grooves. Consequently, our data question the general presence of parasegmental grooves in arthropods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00427-022-00684-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8918137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89181372022-03-17 Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods Janssen, Ralf Turetzek, Natascha Pechmann, Matthias Dev Genes Evol Short Communication In the arthropod model species Drosophila melanogaster, a dipteran fly, segmentation of the anterior–posterior body axis is under control of a hierarchic gene cascade. Segmental boundaries that form morphological grooves are established posteriorly within the segmental expression domain of the segment-polarity gene (SPG) engrailed (en). More important for the development of the fly, however, are the parasegmental boundaries that are established at the interface of en expressing cells and anteriorly adjacent wingless (wg) expressing cells. In Drosophila, both segmental and transient parasegmental grooves form. The latter are positioned anterior to the expression of en. Although the function of the SPGs in establishing and maintaining segmental and parasegmental boundaries is highly conserved among arthropods, parasegmental grooves have only been reported for Drosophila, and a spider (Cupiennius salei). Here, we present new data on en expression, and re-evaluate published data, from four distantly related spiders, including Cupiennius, and a distantly related chelicerate, the harvestman Phalangium opilio. Gene expression analysis of en genes in these animals does not corroborate the presence of parasegmental grooves. Consequently, our data question the general presence of parasegmental grooves in arthropods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00427-022-00684-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8918137/ /pubmed/35038005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-022-00684-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Janssen, Ralf Turetzek, Natascha Pechmann, Matthias Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title | Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title_full | Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title_fullStr | Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title_short | Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
title_sort | lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35038005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-022-00684-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenralf lackofevidenceforconservedparasegmentalgroovesinarthropods AT turetzeknatascha lackofevidenceforconservedparasegmentalgroovesinarthropods AT pechmannmatthias lackofevidenceforconservedparasegmentalgroovesinarthropods |