Cargando…

The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a common procedure in intensive care units (ICUs). Although it is thought to be safe and easily performed at the bedside, PDT usually requires endotracheal guidance, such as bronchoscopy. Here, we assessed the clinical outcomes and safety o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ji Eun, Lee, Dong Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172525
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00906
_version_ 1784668791084417024
author Kim, Ji Eun
Lee, Dong Hyun
author_facet Kim, Ji Eun
Lee, Dong Hyun
author_sort Kim, Ji Eun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a common procedure in intensive care units (ICUs). Although it is thought to be safe and easily performed at the bedside, PDT usually requires endotracheal guidance, such as bronchoscopy. Here, we assessed the clinical outcomes and safety of PDT conducted without endotracheal guidance. METHODS: In the ICU and coronary ICU at a tertiary hospital, PDT was routinely performed without endotracheal guidance by a single medical intensivist using the Griggs technique PDT kit (Portex Percutaneous Tracheostomy Kit). We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent PDT without endotracheal guidance. RESULTS: From January 1 to December 31, 2018, 78 patients underwent PDT without endotracheal guidance in the ICU and coronary ICU. The mean age of these subjects was 71.9±11.5 years, and 29 (37.2%) were female. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 25.9±5.8. Fifty patients (64.1%) were on mechanical ventilation during PDT. Failure of the initial PDT attempt occurred in four patients (5.1%). In two of them, PDT was aborted and converted to surgical tracheostomy; in the other two patients, PDT was reattempted after endotracheal reintubation, with success. Minor bleeding at the tracheostomy site requiring gauze changes was observed in five patients (6.4%). There were no airway problems requiring therapeutic interventions or procedure-related sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: PDT without endotracheal guidance can be considered safe and feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8918715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89187152022-03-21 The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit Kim, Ji Eun Lee, Dong Hyun Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a common procedure in intensive care units (ICUs). Although it is thought to be safe and easily performed at the bedside, PDT usually requires endotracheal guidance, such as bronchoscopy. Here, we assessed the clinical outcomes and safety of PDT conducted without endotracheal guidance. METHODS: In the ICU and coronary ICU at a tertiary hospital, PDT was routinely performed without endotracheal guidance by a single medical intensivist using the Griggs technique PDT kit (Portex Percutaneous Tracheostomy Kit). We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent PDT without endotracheal guidance. RESULTS: From January 1 to December 31, 2018, 78 patients underwent PDT without endotracheal guidance in the ICU and coronary ICU. The mean age of these subjects was 71.9±11.5 years, and 29 (37.2%) were female. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 25.9±5.8. Fifty patients (64.1%) were on mechanical ventilation during PDT. Failure of the initial PDT attempt occurred in four patients (5.1%). In two of them, PDT was aborted and converted to surgical tracheostomy; in the other two patients, PDT was reattempted after endotracheal reintubation, with success. Minor bleeding at the tracheostomy site requiring gauze changes was observed in five patients (6.4%). There were no airway problems requiring therapeutic interventions or procedure-related sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: PDT without endotracheal guidance can be considered safe and feasible. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2022-02 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8918715/ /pubmed/35172525 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00906 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Ji Eun
Lee, Dong Hyun
The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title_full The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title_fullStr The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title_short The feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
title_sort feasibility and safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy without endotracheal guidance in the intensive care unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172525
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00906
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjieun thefeasibilityandsafetyofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomywithoutendotrachealguidanceintheintensivecareunit
AT leedonghyun thefeasibilityandsafetyofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomywithoutendotrachealguidanceintheintensivecareunit
AT kimjieun feasibilityandsafetyofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomywithoutendotrachealguidanceintheintensivecareunit
AT leedonghyun feasibilityandsafetyofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomywithoutendotrachealguidanceintheintensivecareunit