Cargando…

The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity

PURPOSE: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire is the only existing disease-specific instrument for measuring quality of life after pulmonary embolism (PE). It includes six dimensions: frequency of complaints, limitations in activities of daily living, work-related problems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Simone, Meisinger, Christine, Linseisen, Jakob, von Scheidt, Wolfgang, Berghaus, Thomas M., Kirchberger, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03120-3
_version_ 1784668892874932224
author Fischer, Simone
Meisinger, Christine
Linseisen, Jakob
von Scheidt, Wolfgang
Berghaus, Thomas M.
Kirchberger, Inge
author_facet Fischer, Simone
Meisinger, Christine
Linseisen, Jakob
von Scheidt, Wolfgang
Berghaus, Thomas M.
Kirchberger, Inge
author_sort Fischer, Simone
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire is the only existing disease-specific instrument for measuring quality of life after pulmonary embolism (PE). It includes six dimensions: frequency of complaints, limitations in activities of daily living, work-related problems, social limitations, intensity of complaints and emotional complaints. The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties including responsiveness and structural validity of the German version. METHODS: The analysis used data from participants of the LEA cohort study at University Hospital Augsburg. The PEmb-QoL was administered via postal surveys 3, 6 and 12 months post-PE. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Standardized response means (SRM) were calculated for investigating responsiveness. For evaluating the fit of the factor structure, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, we used data from 299 patients 3 months after PE. Cronbach’s alpha (0.87–0.97) and ICC (0.53–0.90) were in an acceptable to good range. SRM scores showed good responsiveness of all dimensions. CFA revealed the four-factor model including one general factor to have a good model fit. CONCLUSION: Despite existing floor effect, most standard criteria of reliability and validity were met and indications for appropriateness of the PEmb-QoL summary score could be found. Apart from some restrictions concerning the factor structure and the dimension of social limitations, our results support the use of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire for evaluating PE-specific quality of life. Future studies should seek replication in different samples to ensure generalizability of the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03120-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89191552022-03-14 The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity Fischer, Simone Meisinger, Christine Linseisen, Jakob von Scheidt, Wolfgang Berghaus, Thomas M. Kirchberger, Inge Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire is the only existing disease-specific instrument for measuring quality of life after pulmonary embolism (PE). It includes six dimensions: frequency of complaints, limitations in activities of daily living, work-related problems, social limitations, intensity of complaints and emotional complaints. The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties including responsiveness and structural validity of the German version. METHODS: The analysis used data from participants of the LEA cohort study at University Hospital Augsburg. The PEmb-QoL was administered via postal surveys 3, 6 and 12 months post-PE. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Standardized response means (SRM) were calculated for investigating responsiveness. For evaluating the fit of the factor structure, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, we used data from 299 patients 3 months after PE. Cronbach’s alpha (0.87–0.97) and ICC (0.53–0.90) were in an acceptable to good range. SRM scores showed good responsiveness of all dimensions. CFA revealed the four-factor model including one general factor to have a good model fit. CONCLUSION: Despite existing floor effect, most standard criteria of reliability and validity were met and indications for appropriateness of the PEmb-QoL summary score could be found. Apart from some restrictions concerning the factor structure and the dimension of social limitations, our results support the use of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire for evaluating PE-specific quality of life. Future studies should seek replication in different samples to ensure generalizability of the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03120-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8919155/ /pubmed/35286537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03120-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Fischer, Simone
Meisinger, Christine
Linseisen, Jakob
von Scheidt, Wolfgang
Berghaus, Thomas M.
Kirchberger, Inge
The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title_full The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title_fullStr The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title_full_unstemmed The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title_short The German version of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
title_sort german version of the pulmonary embolism quality of life (pemb-qol) questionnaire: reliability, responsiveness and structural validity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03120-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fischersimone thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT meisingerchristine thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT linseisenjakob thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT vonscheidtwolfgang thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT berghausthomasm thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT kirchbergeringe thegermanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT fischersimone germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT meisingerchristine germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT linseisenjakob germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT vonscheidtwolfgang germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT berghausthomasm germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity
AT kirchbergeringe germanversionofthepulmonaryembolismqualityoflifepembqolquestionnairereliabilityresponsivenessandstructuralvalidity