Cargando…

Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a significant public health problem. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a rich data source to facilitate resolution of medication non-adherence. PatientToc™ is an electronic PRO data collection software originally implemented at primary care practices in C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A., Curran, Geoffrey M., Jaynes, Heather A., Hillman, Lisa A., Sangasubana, Nisaratana, Chewning, Betty A., Kreling, David H., Schommer, Jon C., Murawski, Matthew M., Perkins, Susan M., Snyder, Margie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3
_version_ 1784668894340841472
author Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A.
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Jaynes, Heather A.
Hillman, Lisa A.
Sangasubana, Nisaratana
Chewning, Betty A.
Kreling, David H.
Schommer, Jon C.
Murawski, Matthew M.
Perkins, Susan M.
Snyder, Margie E.
author_facet Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A.
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Jaynes, Heather A.
Hillman, Lisa A.
Sangasubana, Nisaratana
Chewning, Betty A.
Kreling, David H.
Schommer, Jon C.
Murawski, Matthew M.
Perkins, Susan M.
Snyder, Margie E.
author_sort Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a significant public health problem. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a rich data source to facilitate resolution of medication non-adherence. PatientToc™ is an electronic PRO data collection software originally implemented at primary care practices in California, United States (US). Currently, the use of standardized PRO data collection systems in US community pharmacies is limited. Thus, we are conducting a two-phase evaluation of the spread and scale of PatientToc™ to US Midwestern community pharmacies. This report focuses on the first phase of the evaluation. The objective of this phase was to prepare for implementation of PatientToc™ in community pharmacies by conducting a pre-implementation developmental formative evaluation to (1) identify potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations to PatientToc™ implementation and (2) create a draft implementation toolkit. METHODS: Data collection consisted of demographics, observations, audio-recorded contextual inquiries, and semi-structured interviews with staff (e.g., primary care providers, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians) and patients during 1-day site visits to a purposive sample of (1) primary care practices currently using PatientToc™ and (2) community pharmacies in Indiana, Wisconsin, and Minnesota interested in the future use of PatientToc™. Post-visit site observation debriefs were also audio-recorded. Verbatim transcripts of all recordings were coded using deductive/inductive approaches and intra-/inter-site summaries were produced identifying potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. A stakeholder advisory panel engaged in an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) implementation process. This included “member checking” and prioritizing findings, and feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application, implementation strategies, and accompanying toolkit for community pharmacy implementation. RESULTS: Two primary care practices, nine pharmacies, and 89 individuals participated. Eight major themes (four barriers and four facilitators) and 14 recommendations were identified. Throughout the four EBQI sessions, the panel (1) confirmed findings; (2) designated high priority recommendations: (a) explain PatientToc™ and its benefits clearly and simply to patients, (b) ensure patients can complete questionnaires within 10 min, and (c) provide hands-on training/resources for pharmacy teams; and (3) provided feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application and finalized toolkit items for initial community pharmacy implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of electronically captured PROs in community pharmacies is warranted. The implementation strategies systematically developed in this study can serve as a model for implementation of technology-driven health information patient care services, in the understudied context of community pharmacies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89191612022-03-14 Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A. Curran, Geoffrey M. Jaynes, Heather A. Hillman, Lisa A. Sangasubana, Nisaratana Chewning, Betty A. Kreling, David H. Schommer, Jon C. Murawski, Matthew M. Perkins, Susan M. Snyder, Margie E. Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a significant public health problem. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a rich data source to facilitate resolution of medication non-adherence. PatientToc™ is an electronic PRO data collection software originally implemented at primary care practices in California, United States (US). Currently, the use of standardized PRO data collection systems in US community pharmacies is limited. Thus, we are conducting a two-phase evaluation of the spread and scale of PatientToc™ to US Midwestern community pharmacies. This report focuses on the first phase of the evaluation. The objective of this phase was to prepare for implementation of PatientToc™ in community pharmacies by conducting a pre-implementation developmental formative evaluation to (1) identify potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations to PatientToc™ implementation and (2) create a draft implementation toolkit. METHODS: Data collection consisted of demographics, observations, audio-recorded contextual inquiries, and semi-structured interviews with staff (e.g., primary care providers, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians) and patients during 1-day site visits to a purposive sample of (1) primary care practices currently using PatientToc™ and (2) community pharmacies in Indiana, Wisconsin, and Minnesota interested in the future use of PatientToc™. Post-visit site observation debriefs were also audio-recorded. Verbatim transcripts of all recordings were coded using deductive/inductive approaches and intra-/inter-site summaries were produced identifying potential barriers, facilitators, and actionable recommendations mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. A stakeholder advisory panel engaged in an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) implementation process. This included “member checking” and prioritizing findings, and feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application, implementation strategies, and accompanying toolkit for community pharmacy implementation. RESULTS: Two primary care practices, nine pharmacies, and 89 individuals participated. Eight major themes (four barriers and four facilitators) and 14 recommendations were identified. Throughout the four EBQI sessions, the panel (1) confirmed findings; (2) designated high priority recommendations: (a) explain PatientToc™ and its benefits clearly and simply to patients, (b) ensure patients can complete questionnaires within 10 min, and (c) provide hands-on training/resources for pharmacy teams; and (3) provided feedback on the adapted PatientToc™ application and finalized toolkit items for initial community pharmacy implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of electronically captured PROs in community pharmacies is warranted. The implementation strategies systematically developed in this study can serve as a model for implementation of technology-driven health information patient care services, in the understudied context of community pharmacies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3. BioMed Central 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8919161/ /pubmed/35287764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A.
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Jaynes, Heather A.
Hillman, Lisa A.
Sangasubana, Nisaratana
Chewning, Betty A.
Kreling, David H.
Schommer, Jon C.
Murawski, Matthew M.
Perkins, Susan M.
Snyder, Margie E.
Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title_full Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title_short Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
title_sort preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (pro) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3
work_keys_str_mv AT adeoyeolatundeomololaa preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT currangeoffreym preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT jaynesheathera preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT hillmanlisaa preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT sangasubananisaratana preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT chewningbettya preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT krelingdavidh preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT schommerjonc preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT murawskimatthewm preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT perkinssusanm preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy
AT snydermargiee preparingforthespreadofpatientreportedoutcomeprodatacollectionfromprimarycaretocommunitypharmacyamixedmethodsstudy