Cargando…
Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric
BACKGROUND: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized by trainees across various specialties and can rapidly assess the cardiac status of unstable patients. However, the quality of trainee performed cardiac examinations has been reported only in controlled studies. In this st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100993 |
_version_ | 1784668903925874688 |
---|---|
author | Prenner, Stuart B Ambrose, Marietta Gopal, Dipika J Manthey, Sina Spears, Jenna Sussman, Allison Baston, Cameron |
author_facet | Prenner, Stuart B Ambrose, Marietta Gopal, Dipika J Manthey, Sina Spears, Jenna Sussman, Allison Baston, Cameron |
author_sort | Prenner, Stuart B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized by trainees across various specialties and can rapidly assess the cardiac status of unstable patients. However, the quality of trainee performed cardiac examinations has been reported only in controlled studies. In this study we aimed to assess the quality of all cardiac POCUS performed by internal medicine trainees at a major academic medical center over a three-year period. METHODS: 256 studies were included and were graded by experts blinded to postgraduate year (PGY) using a previously validated scoring metric. RESULTS: We found significant improvement in overall quality of resident performed cardiac POCUS from PGY 1 to 3 (10.8, 10.2, 13.2, p = 0.012). Assessment of left ventricular function was possible in 82% of studies and increased from PGY 1 to PGY 3 (77%, 76%, 88%, p = 0.025). Similar trends were seen in the assessment of the pericardial space (67%, 71%, 84%, p = 0.012). Images sufficient for right ventricular and volume status assessment were less commonly found (65%, 60%, 75% and 60%, 49%, 57%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a real world experience of the level of diagnostic accuracy that can be expected from IM trainees with minimal hands-on supervision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8919212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89192122022-03-15 Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric Prenner, Stuart B Ambrose, Marietta Gopal, Dipika J Manthey, Sina Spears, Jenna Sussman, Allison Baston, Cameron Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized by trainees across various specialties and can rapidly assess the cardiac status of unstable patients. However, the quality of trainee performed cardiac examinations has been reported only in controlled studies. In this study we aimed to assess the quality of all cardiac POCUS performed by internal medicine trainees at a major academic medical center over a three-year period. METHODS: 256 studies were included and were graded by experts blinded to postgraduate year (PGY) using a previously validated scoring metric. RESULTS: We found significant improvement in overall quality of resident performed cardiac POCUS from PGY 1 to 3 (10.8, 10.2, 13.2, p = 0.012). Assessment of left ventricular function was possible in 82% of studies and increased from PGY 1 to PGY 3 (77%, 76%, 88%, p = 0.025). Similar trends were seen in the assessment of the pericardial space (67%, 71%, 84%, p = 0.012). Images sufficient for right ventricular and volume status assessment were less commonly found (65%, 60%, 75% and 60%, 49%, 57%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a real world experience of the level of diagnostic accuracy that can be expected from IM trainees with minimal hands-on supervision. Elsevier 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8919212/ /pubmed/35295903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100993 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Prenner, Stuart B Ambrose, Marietta Gopal, Dipika J Manthey, Sina Spears, Jenna Sussman, Allison Baston, Cameron Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title | Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title_full | Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title_fullStr | Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title_full_unstemmed | Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title_short | Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
title_sort | pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prennerstuartb pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT ambrosemarietta pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT gopaldipikaj pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT mantheysina pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT spearsjenna pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT sussmanallison pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric AT bastoncameron pragmaticassessmentofresidentperformedcardiacpointofcareultrasoundusingavalidatedscoringmetric |