Cargando…

Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most prevalent cardiovascular disease. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the development of acute and chronic complications. New approaches aimed at improving the prognosis of patients with PE are largely dependent on reliable animal models. Mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karpov, Andrei A., Vaulina, Dariya D., Smirnov, Sergey S., Moiseeva, Olga M., Galagudza, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09014
_version_ 1784668906094329856
author Karpov, Andrei A.
Vaulina, Dariya D.
Smirnov, Sergey S.
Moiseeva, Olga M.
Galagudza, Michael M.
author_facet Karpov, Andrei A.
Vaulina, Dariya D.
Smirnov, Sergey S.
Moiseeva, Olga M.
Galagudza, Michael M.
author_sort Karpov, Andrei A.
collection PubMed
description Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most prevalent cardiovascular disease. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the development of acute and chronic complications. New approaches aimed at improving the prognosis of patients with PE are largely dependent on reliable animal models. Mice, rats, hamsters, and rabbits, are currently most commonly used for PE modeling because of their ethical acceptability and economic feasibility. This article provides an overview of the main approaches to PE modeling, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Special attention is paid to experimental endpoints, including morphological, functional, and molecular endpoints. All approaches to PE modeling can be broadly divided into three main groups: 1) induction of thromboembolism, either by thrombus formation in vivo or by injection of in vitro prepared blood clots; 2) introduction of particles of non-thrombotic origin; and 3) surgical procedures. The choice of a specific model and animal species is determined based on the objectives of the study. Rodent models of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), which is the most devastating complication of PE, are also described. CTEPH models are especially challenging because of insufficient knowledge about the pathogenesis and high fibrinolytic activity of rodent plasma. The CTEPH model should demonstrate a persistent increase in pulmonary artery pressure and stable reduction of the vascular bed due to recurrent embolism. Based on the analysis of available evidence, one might conclude that currently, there is no single optimal method for modeling PE and CTEPH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89192242022-03-15 Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Karpov, Andrei A. Vaulina, Dariya D. Smirnov, Sergey S. Moiseeva, Olga M. Galagudza, Michael M. Heliyon Review Article Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most prevalent cardiovascular disease. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the development of acute and chronic complications. New approaches aimed at improving the prognosis of patients with PE are largely dependent on reliable animal models. Mice, rats, hamsters, and rabbits, are currently most commonly used for PE modeling because of their ethical acceptability and economic feasibility. This article provides an overview of the main approaches to PE modeling, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Special attention is paid to experimental endpoints, including morphological, functional, and molecular endpoints. All approaches to PE modeling can be broadly divided into three main groups: 1) induction of thromboembolism, either by thrombus formation in vivo or by injection of in vitro prepared blood clots; 2) introduction of particles of non-thrombotic origin; and 3) surgical procedures. The choice of a specific model and animal species is determined based on the objectives of the study. Rodent models of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), which is the most devastating complication of PE, are also described. CTEPH models are especially challenging because of insufficient knowledge about the pathogenesis and high fibrinolytic activity of rodent plasma. The CTEPH model should demonstrate a persistent increase in pulmonary artery pressure and stable reduction of the vascular bed due to recurrent embolism. Based on the analysis of available evidence, one might conclude that currently, there is no single optimal method for modeling PE and CTEPH. Elsevier 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8919224/ /pubmed/35295664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09014 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Karpov, Andrei A.
Vaulina, Dariya D.
Smirnov, Sergey S.
Moiseeva, Olga M.
Galagudza, Michael M.
Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title_full Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title_fullStr Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title_short Rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
title_sort rodent models of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09014
work_keys_str_mv AT karpovandreia rodentmodelsofpulmonaryembolismandchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertension
AT vaulinadariyad rodentmodelsofpulmonaryembolismandchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertension
AT smirnovsergeys rodentmodelsofpulmonaryembolismandchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertension
AT moiseevaolgam rodentmodelsofpulmonaryembolismandchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertension
AT galagudzamichaelm rodentmodelsofpulmonaryembolismandchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertension