Cargando…

Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial

INTRODUCTION: Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with immediate ACL reconstruction. More...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smeets, Annemie, Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Feryal, Bogaerts, Stijn, De Groef, An, Berger, Pieter, Kaux, Jean-François, Daniel, Christophe, Croisier, Jean-Louis, Delvaux, François, Laenen, Annouschka, Staes, Filip, Peers, Koen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055349
_version_ 1784668941007716352
author Smeets, Annemie
Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Feryal
Bogaerts, Stijn
De Groef, An
Berger, Pieter
Kaux, Jean-François
Daniel, Christophe
Croisier, Jean-Louis
Delvaux, François
Laenen, Annouschka
Staes, Filip
Peers, Koen
author_facet Smeets, Annemie
Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Feryal
Bogaerts, Stijn
De Groef, An
Berger, Pieter
Kaux, Jean-François
Daniel, Christophe
Croisier, Jean-Louis
Delvaux, François
Laenen, Annouschka
Staes, Filip
Peers, Koen
author_sort Smeets, Annemie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to in the first place verify these results, and second to assess whether patient-specific parameters determine whether a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other. However, before running a full RCT, it seems necessary to perform a pilot study that assesses the feasibility of recruiting patients with ACL for such a RCT. This is because recruitment may be challenging as many patients have strong treatment beliefs. Therefore, this pilot study will assess whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to participant recruitment, adherence to the allocated treatment arm and protocol feasibility. These pilot findings will help deciding about progressing to a future full RCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from two Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomised to either conservative treatment or surgical treatment. Patients will be followed-up at 3, 6 and 12 months postrandomisation. Recruitment feasibility will be evaluated by calculating the recruitment rate 4 months after the two sites have been initiated. Clear criteria for progression to a full trial are defined. Adherence to the protocol will be assessed by calculating the proportion of patients who complete the assessments. Furthermore the proportion of patients who cross-over between treatment arms during the follow-up period will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committees: Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven (S62004) and Comité d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège (2020212). Results will be made available to caregivers, researchers and funder. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04408690) on 29 May 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89194382022-03-25 Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial Smeets, Annemie Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Feryal Bogaerts, Stijn De Groef, An Berger, Pieter Kaux, Jean-François Daniel, Christophe Croisier, Jean-Louis Delvaux, François Laenen, Annouschka Staes, Filip Peers, Koen BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine INTRODUCTION: Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to in the first place verify these results, and second to assess whether patient-specific parameters determine whether a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other. However, before running a full RCT, it seems necessary to perform a pilot study that assesses the feasibility of recruiting patients with ACL for such a RCT. This is because recruitment may be challenging as many patients have strong treatment beliefs. Therefore, this pilot study will assess whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to participant recruitment, adherence to the allocated treatment arm and protocol feasibility. These pilot findings will help deciding about progressing to a future full RCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from two Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomised to either conservative treatment or surgical treatment. Patients will be followed-up at 3, 6 and 12 months postrandomisation. Recruitment feasibility will be evaluated by calculating the recruitment rate 4 months after the two sites have been initiated. Clear criteria for progression to a full trial are defined. Adherence to the protocol will be assessed by calculating the proportion of patients who complete the assessments. Furthermore the proportion of patients who cross-over between treatment arms during the follow-up period will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committees: Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven (S62004) and Comité d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège (2020212). Results will be made available to caregivers, researchers and funder. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04408690) on 29 May 2020. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8919438/ /pubmed/35277406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055349 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Smeets, Annemie
Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz, Feryal
Bogaerts, Stijn
De Groef, An
Berger, Pieter
Kaux, Jean-François
Daniel, Christophe
Croisier, Jean-Louis
Delvaux, François
Laenen, Annouschka
Staes, Filip
Peers, Koen
Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title_full Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title_fullStr Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title_short Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial
title_sort pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares immediate versus optional delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injury: ioda pilot trial
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055349
work_keys_str_mv AT smeetsannemie pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT ghafelzadehahwazferyal pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT bogaertsstijn pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT degroefan pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT bergerpieter pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT kauxjeanfrancois pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT danielchristophe pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT croisierjeanlouis pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT delvauxfrancois pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT laenenannouschka pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT staesfilip pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial
AT peerskoen pilotstudytoinvestigatethefeasibilityofconductingarandomisedcontrolledtrialthatcomparesimmediateversusoptionaldelayedsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofacuteanteriorcruciateligamentinjuryiodapilottrial