Cargando…

Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients

OBJECTIVE: The extent of regional lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) has remained a controversy and a matter of considerable debate for a long time. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features to investigate the predictive factors for No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xiao, Zheng, Yanan, Feng, Runhua, Zhu, Zhenggang, Yan, Min, Li, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.810509
_version_ 1784668950014984192
author Yang, Xiao
Zheng, Yanan
Feng, Runhua
Zhu, Zhenggang
Yan, Min
Li, Chen
author_facet Yang, Xiao
Zheng, Yanan
Feng, Runhua
Zhu, Zhenggang
Yan, Min
Li, Chen
author_sort Yang, Xiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The extent of regional lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) has remained a controversy and a matter of considerable debate for a long time. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features to investigate the predictive factors for No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node metastases (LNMs) and evaluate the feasibility of performing proximal gastrectomy (PG) with preservation of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph nodes for these patients. METHOD: Patients who had undergone total gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 395 eligible patients in our study, 34 patients (8.61%) had No. 5 and No. 6 LNM. The degree of differentiation, Borrmann classification, vascular or perineural invasion, tumor diameter, depth of invasion, and other perigastric LNM were associated with No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor diameter ≥4 cm, No. 4 LNM positive, and No. 7, No. 8, No. 9 LNM positive were independent risk factors of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM was not observed in the 105 patients who were staged from T1 to T3 and were found to be without independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: The metastatic rate of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node of the proximal gastric adenocarcinoma was closely associated with the diameter of the tumor and other perigastric LNMs. It is feasible to preserve No. 5 and No. 6 lymph nodes with PG for the T1–T3 patients with lower risk of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89195122022-03-15 Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients Yang, Xiao Zheng, Yanan Feng, Runhua Zhu, Zhenggang Yan, Min Li, Chen Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The extent of regional lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) has remained a controversy and a matter of considerable debate for a long time. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features to investigate the predictive factors for No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node metastases (LNMs) and evaluate the feasibility of performing proximal gastrectomy (PG) with preservation of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph nodes for these patients. METHOD: Patients who had undergone total gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 395 eligible patients in our study, 34 patients (8.61%) had No. 5 and No. 6 LNM. The degree of differentiation, Borrmann classification, vascular or perineural invasion, tumor diameter, depth of invasion, and other perigastric LNM were associated with No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor diameter ≥4 cm, No. 4 LNM positive, and No. 7, No. 8, No. 9 LNM positive were independent risk factors of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM was not observed in the 105 patients who were staged from T1 to T3 and were found to be without independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: The metastatic rate of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node of the proximal gastric adenocarcinoma was closely associated with the diameter of the tumor and other perigastric LNMs. It is feasible to preserve No. 5 and No. 6 lymph nodes with PG for the T1–T3 patients with lower risk of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8919512/ /pubmed/35296021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.810509 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Zheng, Feng, Zhu, Yan and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Yang, Xiao
Zheng, Yanan
Feng, Runhua
Zhu, Zhenggang
Yan, Min
Li, Chen
Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title_full Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title_fullStr Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title_short Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients
title_sort feasibility of preserving no. 5 and no. 6 lymph nodes in gastrectomy of proximal gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 395 patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.810509
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxiao feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients
AT zhengyanan feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients
AT fengrunhua feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients
AT zhuzhenggang feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients
AT yanmin feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients
AT lichen feasibilityofpreservingno5andno6lymphnodesingastrectomyofproximalgastricadenocarcinomaaretrospectiveanalysisof395patients