Cargando…

Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Screening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadeau, Hugh C. G., Bisson, Courtney, Chen, Xi, Zhao, Yan D., Williams, Marvin, Edwards, Rodney K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04546-w
_version_ 1784668954351894528
author Nadeau, Hugh C. G.
Bisson, Courtney
Chen, Xi
Zhao, Yan D.
Williams, Marvin
Edwards, Rodney K.
author_facet Nadeau, Hugh C. G.
Bisson, Courtney
Chen, Xi
Zhao, Yan D.
Williams, Marvin
Edwards, Rodney K.
author_sort Nadeau, Hugh C. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and the more typically used vaginal-rectal culture for screening for maternal anogenital GBS colonization in the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Eligible English-language studies published until January 2020 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Studies were compiled that assessed for GBS colonization utilizing vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and vaginal-rectal culture during the third trimester of pregnancy. Nonoriginal research articles and studies that did not assess pregnant patients, did not use culture-based screening, or did not compare vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture with vaginal-rectal culture were excluded. The search identified 559 articles with three prospective cohort studies that met inclusion criteria, including 643 participants. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Patient characteristics and associated pain with specimen collection were abstracted. Meta-analyses of both the raw agreement and the Cohen’s kappa statistic were performed. RESULTS: Within the three included studies, the range of GBS detection was 17.6–34.0%, consistent with the anticipated prevalence of GBS colonization reported in earlier publications. For both raw agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient, the test for heterogeneity was not significant, indicating low heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimate of the raw agreement was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95–0.98) and of the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95), indicating (according to the Landis and Koch criteria) an “almost perfect” agreement between the compared clinical tests. In the two studies that assessed procedure-related patient discomfort, vaginal-rectal swabbing caused more discomfort. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal-perineal culture for assessment of maternal GBS colonization is comparable to the more typically utilized vaginal-rectal culture and is associated with less discomfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89195372022-03-16 Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nadeau, Hugh C. G. Bisson, Courtney Chen, Xi Zhao, Yan D. Williams, Marvin Edwards, Rodney K. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Screening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and the more typically used vaginal-rectal culture for screening for maternal anogenital GBS colonization in the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Eligible English-language studies published until January 2020 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Studies were compiled that assessed for GBS colonization utilizing vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and vaginal-rectal culture during the third trimester of pregnancy. Nonoriginal research articles and studies that did not assess pregnant patients, did not use culture-based screening, or did not compare vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture with vaginal-rectal culture were excluded. The search identified 559 articles with three prospective cohort studies that met inclusion criteria, including 643 participants. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Patient characteristics and associated pain with specimen collection were abstracted. Meta-analyses of both the raw agreement and the Cohen’s kappa statistic were performed. RESULTS: Within the three included studies, the range of GBS detection was 17.6–34.0%, consistent with the anticipated prevalence of GBS colonization reported in earlier publications. For both raw agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient, the test for heterogeneity was not significant, indicating low heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimate of the raw agreement was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95–0.98) and of the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95), indicating (according to the Landis and Koch criteria) an “almost perfect” agreement between the compared clinical tests. In the two studies that assessed procedure-related patient discomfort, vaginal-rectal swabbing caused more discomfort. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal-perineal culture for assessment of maternal GBS colonization is comparable to the more typically utilized vaginal-rectal culture and is associated with less discomfort. BioMed Central 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8919537/ /pubmed/35287615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04546-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nadeau, Hugh C. G.
Bisson, Courtney
Chen, Xi
Zhao, Yan D.
Williams, Marvin
Edwards, Rodney K.
Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for group b streptococci (gbs) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04546-w
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeauhughcg vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bissoncourtney vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenxi vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoyand vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamsmarvin vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT edwardsrodneyk vaginalperianalorvaginalperinealcomparedwithvaginalrectalculturebasedscreeningforgroupbstreptococcigbscolonizationduringthethirdtrimesterofpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis