Cargando…

The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been previously reported that inflow occlusion does not affect postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, for patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma(rHCC), the effect of hepatic inflow occlusion and the number of occlusion times on the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Feng, Huang, Zhiyuan, Ndhlovu, Elijah, Zhang, Mingyu, Chen, Xiaoping, Zhang, Bixiang, Zhu, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01537-8
_version_ 1784668960457752576
author Xia, Feng
Huang, Zhiyuan
Ndhlovu, Elijah
Zhang, Mingyu
Chen, Xiaoping
Zhang, Bixiang
Zhu, Peng
author_facet Xia, Feng
Huang, Zhiyuan
Ndhlovu, Elijah
Zhang, Mingyu
Chen, Xiaoping
Zhang, Bixiang
Zhu, Peng
author_sort Xia, Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been previously reported that inflow occlusion does not affect postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, for patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma(rHCC), the effect of hepatic inflow occlusion and the number of occlusion times on the prognosis is unknown. METHODS: 203 patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this study. They were first divided into the non-hepatic inflow occlusion (non-HIO) group and the hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) group. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Patients in the HIO group were further divided into one-time HIO and two times HIO groups. KM method was also used to compare the two groups. Finally, independent risk factors affecting RFS and OS were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULT: In the non-HIO group, 1-,3- and 5-year OS rates were 67.0%, 41.0%, and 22.0%respectively, and RFS rates were 45.0%, 31.0%, and 20.0% respectively; In the one-HIO group, the 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 55.1%, 32.1%, and 19.2% respectively, and RFS rates were 33.3%, 16.7%, and 7.7% respectively; In the two-HIO group, 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 24.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively, and RFS rates were 8.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively. By Cox regression analysis, HIO was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in rHCC patients. CONCLUSION: One time hepatic inflow occlusion did not affect postoperative OS, but negatively affected the RFS of rHCC patients; two times hepatic inflow occlusion negatively affected the postoperative OS and RFS in patients with rHCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89195682022-03-16 The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy Xia, Feng Huang, Zhiyuan Ndhlovu, Elijah Zhang, Mingyu Chen, Xiaoping Zhang, Bixiang Zhu, Peng BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been previously reported that inflow occlusion does not affect postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, for patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma(rHCC), the effect of hepatic inflow occlusion and the number of occlusion times on the prognosis is unknown. METHODS: 203 patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this study. They were first divided into the non-hepatic inflow occlusion (non-HIO) group and the hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) group. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Patients in the HIO group were further divided into one-time HIO and two times HIO groups. KM method was also used to compare the two groups. Finally, independent risk factors affecting RFS and OS were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULT: In the non-HIO group, 1-,3- and 5-year OS rates were 67.0%, 41.0%, and 22.0%respectively, and RFS rates were 45.0%, 31.0%, and 20.0% respectively; In the one-HIO group, the 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 55.1%, 32.1%, and 19.2% respectively, and RFS rates were 33.3%, 16.7%, and 7.7% respectively; In the two-HIO group, 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 24.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively, and RFS rates were 8.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively. By Cox regression analysis, HIO was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in rHCC patients. CONCLUSION: One time hepatic inflow occlusion did not affect postoperative OS, but negatively affected the RFS of rHCC patients; two times hepatic inflow occlusion negatively affected the postoperative OS and RFS in patients with rHCC. BioMed Central 2022-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8919568/ /pubmed/35282826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01537-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xia, Feng
Huang, Zhiyuan
Ndhlovu, Elijah
Zhang, Mingyu
Chen, Xiaoping
Zhang, Bixiang
Zhu, Peng
The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title_full The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title_fullStr The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title_short The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
title_sort effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01537-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xiafeng theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT huangzhiyuan theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT ndhlovuelijah theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhangmingyu theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT chenxiaoping theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhangbixiang theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhupeng theeffectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT xiafeng effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT huangzhiyuan effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT ndhlovuelijah effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhangmingyu effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT chenxiaoping effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhangbixiang effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy
AT zhupeng effectofthenumberofhepaticinflowocclusiontimesontheprognosisofrupturedhepatocellularcarcinomapatientsafterhepatectomy