Cargando…

Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions

OBJECTIVE: This study examined motor unit (MU) firing rates during a prolonged isometric contraction of the vastus lateralis (VL) for females and males. METHODS: Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were recorded from the VL for eleven females and twelve males during a 45-second isometric trapez...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimmick, Hannah L., Trevino, Michael A., Miller, Jonathan D., Parra, Mandy E., Sterczala, Adam J., Herda, Trent J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35234156
_version_ 1784668977313611776
author Dimmick, Hannah L.
Trevino, Michael A.
Miller, Jonathan D.
Parra, Mandy E.
Sterczala, Adam J.
Herda, Trent J.
author_facet Dimmick, Hannah L.
Trevino, Michael A.
Miller, Jonathan D.
Parra, Mandy E.
Sterczala, Adam J.
Herda, Trent J.
author_sort Dimmick, Hannah L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study examined motor unit (MU) firing rates during a prolonged isometric contraction of the vastus lateralis (VL) for females and males. METHODS: Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were recorded from the VL for eleven females and twelve males during a 45-second isometric trapezoid muscle actions at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For each MU, mean firing rate (MFR) was calculated for the initial and final 10-second epochs of the steady torque segment and regressed against recruitment threshold (RT, expressed as %MVC), as well as time at recruitment (T(REC), seconds). MFR was also averaged for each subject. RESULTS: Significant differences existed across epochs for the y-intercepts (P=0.009) of the MFR vs. T(REC) relationship, as well as the grouped MFR analysis (P<0.001); no differences were observed between epochs for the MFR vs. RT relationship. Significant differences existed between sexes for the grouped MFR analysis (P=0.049), but no differences were observed for the MFR vs. T(REC) or MFR vs. RT relationships. CONCLUSION: Analysis method may impact interpretation of firing rate behavior; increases in MU firing rates across a prolonged isometric contraction were observed in the MFR vs. T(REC) relationship and the grouped MFR analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89196532022-04-14 Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions Dimmick, Hannah L. Trevino, Michael A. Miller, Jonathan D. Parra, Mandy E. Sterczala, Adam J. Herda, Trent J. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study examined motor unit (MU) firing rates during a prolonged isometric contraction of the vastus lateralis (VL) for females and males. METHODS: Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were recorded from the VL for eleven females and twelve males during a 45-second isometric trapezoid muscle actions at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For each MU, mean firing rate (MFR) was calculated for the initial and final 10-second epochs of the steady torque segment and regressed against recruitment threshold (RT, expressed as %MVC), as well as time at recruitment (T(REC), seconds). MFR was also averaged for each subject. RESULTS: Significant differences existed across epochs for the y-intercepts (P=0.009) of the MFR vs. T(REC) relationship, as well as the grouped MFR analysis (P<0.001); no differences were observed between epochs for the MFR vs. RT relationship. Significant differences existed between sexes for the grouped MFR analysis (P=0.049), but no differences were observed for the MFR vs. T(REC) or MFR vs. RT relationships. CONCLUSION: Analysis method may impact interpretation of firing rate behavior; increases in MU firing rates across a prolonged isometric contraction were observed in the MFR vs. T(REC) relationship and the grouped MFR analysis. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8919653/ /pubmed/35234156 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dimmick, Hannah L.
Trevino, Michael A.
Miller, Jonathan D.
Parra, Mandy E.
Sterczala, Adam J.
Herda, Trent J.
Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title_full Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title_fullStr Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title_full_unstemmed Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title_short Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
title_sort method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35234156
work_keys_str_mv AT dimmickhannahl methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions
AT trevinomichaela methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions
AT millerjonathand methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions
AT parramandye methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions
AT sterczalaadamj methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions
AT herdatrentj methodofanalysisinfluencesinterpretationsofsexrelateddifferencesinfiringratesduringprolongedsubmaximalisometriccontractions