Cargando…
Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic
BACKGROUND: We explored the learning effectiveness of three virtual simulation tools used in the Coronavirus Disease pandemic environment. SAMPLE: Study participants consisted of students from two nursing classes, a junior and a senior class. METHOD: A mixed-methods approach compared three tools’ pe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.03.003 |
_version_ | 1784668999539228672 |
---|---|
author | Schiavenato, Martin Edwards, Susan Tiedt, Jane Owens, Joan |
author_facet | Schiavenato, Martin Edwards, Susan Tiedt, Jane Owens, Joan |
author_sort | Schiavenato, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We explored the learning effectiveness of three virtual simulation tools used in the Coronavirus Disease pandemic environment. SAMPLE: Study participants consisted of students from two nursing classes, a junior and a senior class. METHOD: A mixed-methods approach compared three tools’ performance across five learning domains. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance compared mean ratings for learning domains. Open-ended questions were included for qualitative evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty-six respondents rated the Resource Simulation Center (RSC), based on the observation of videos of students undergoing simulation exercises, as superior to the other two. There were no differences between the other two tools. Qualitative findings echoed preference by students for “RSC”. CONCLUSION: “RSC” was preferred over a commercial product based on computer generated graphics, and a free-online product based on clinical scenarios acted out in short videos. Differences in debriefing practices may have influenced the results, thereby emphasizing the role of debriefing with virtual simulation tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8919797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89197972022-03-14 Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic Schiavenato, Martin Edwards, Susan Tiedt, Jane Owens, Joan Clin Simul Nurs Short Communication BACKGROUND: We explored the learning effectiveness of three virtual simulation tools used in the Coronavirus Disease pandemic environment. SAMPLE: Study participants consisted of students from two nursing classes, a junior and a senior class. METHOD: A mixed-methods approach compared three tools’ performance across five learning domains. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance compared mean ratings for learning domains. Open-ended questions were included for qualitative evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty-six respondents rated the Resource Simulation Center (RSC), based on the observation of videos of students undergoing simulation exercises, as superior to the other two. There were no differences between the other two tools. Qualitative findings echoed preference by students for “RSC”. CONCLUSION: “RSC” was preferred over a commercial product based on computer generated graphics, and a free-online product based on clinical scenarios acted out in short videos. Differences in debriefing practices may have influenced the results, thereby emphasizing the role of debriefing with virtual simulation tools. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8919797/ /pubmed/35308179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.03.003 Text en © 2022 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Schiavenato, Martin Edwards, Susan Tiedt, Jane Owens, Joan Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title | Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title_full | Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title_short | Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Three Virtual Simulation Tools With Nursing Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic |
title_sort | comparing the learning effectiveness of three virtual simulation tools with nursing students during the coronavirus disease (covid-19) pandemic |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiavenatomartin comparingthelearningeffectivenessofthreevirtualsimulationtoolswithnursingstudentsduringthecoronavirusdiseasecovid19pandemic AT edwardssusan comparingthelearningeffectivenessofthreevirtualsimulationtoolswithnursingstudentsduringthecoronavirusdiseasecovid19pandemic AT tiedtjane comparingthelearningeffectivenessofthreevirtualsimulationtoolswithnursingstudentsduringthecoronavirusdiseasecovid19pandemic AT owensjoan comparingthelearningeffectivenessofthreevirtualsimulationtoolswithnursingstudentsduringthecoronavirusdiseasecovid19pandemic |