Cargando…

Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of MRI in patients with fragmented retained leads (FRLs) through numerical simulation and phantom experiments. METHODS: Electromagnetic and thermal simulations were performed to determine the worst‐case RF heating of 10 patient‐derived FRL models during MRI at 1.5 T a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Bach T., Bhusal, Bhumi, Rahsepar, Amir Ali, Fawcett, Kate, Lin, Stella, Marks, Daniel S., Passman, Rod, Nieto, Donny, Niemzcura, Richard, Golestanirad, Laleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34958685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29116
_version_ 1784669001053372416
author Nguyen, Bach T.
Bhusal, Bhumi
Rahsepar, Amir Ali
Fawcett, Kate
Lin, Stella
Marks, Daniel S.
Passman, Rod
Nieto, Donny
Niemzcura, Richard
Golestanirad, Laleh
author_facet Nguyen, Bach T.
Bhusal, Bhumi
Rahsepar, Amir Ali
Fawcett, Kate
Lin, Stella
Marks, Daniel S.
Passman, Rod
Nieto, Donny
Niemzcura, Richard
Golestanirad, Laleh
author_sort Nguyen, Bach T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of MRI in patients with fragmented retained leads (FRLs) through numerical simulation and phantom experiments. METHODS: Electromagnetic and thermal simulations were performed to determine the worst‐case RF heating of 10 patient‐derived FRL models during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T and at imaging landmarks corresponding to head, chest, and abdomen. RF heating measurements were performed in phantoms implanted with reconstructed FRL models that produced highest heating in numerical simulations. The potential for unintended tissue stimulation was assessed through a conservative estimation of the electric field induced in the tissue due to gradient‐induced voltages developed along the length of FRLs. RESULTS: In simulations under conservative approach, RF exposure at B(1) (+) ≤ 2 µT generated cumulative equivalent minutes (CEM)(43) < 40 at all imaging landmarks at both 1.5 T and 3 T, indicating no thermal damage for acquisition times (TAs) < 10 min. In experiments, the maximum temperature rise when FRLs were positioned at the location of maximum electric field exposure was measured to be 2.4°C at 3 T and 2.1°C at 1.5 T. Electric fields induced in the tissue due to gradient‐induced voltages remained below the threshold for cardiac tissue stimulation in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation and experimental results indicate that patients with FRLs can be scanned safely at both 1.5 T and 3 T with most clinical pulse sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89198052022-10-14 Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads Nguyen, Bach T. Bhusal, Bhumi Rahsepar, Amir Ali Fawcett, Kate Lin, Stella Marks, Daniel S. Passman, Rod Nieto, Donny Niemzcura, Richard Golestanirad, Laleh Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of MRI in patients with fragmented retained leads (FRLs) through numerical simulation and phantom experiments. METHODS: Electromagnetic and thermal simulations were performed to determine the worst‐case RF heating of 10 patient‐derived FRL models during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T and at imaging landmarks corresponding to head, chest, and abdomen. RF heating measurements were performed in phantoms implanted with reconstructed FRL models that produced highest heating in numerical simulations. The potential for unintended tissue stimulation was assessed through a conservative estimation of the electric field induced in the tissue due to gradient‐induced voltages developed along the length of FRLs. RESULTS: In simulations under conservative approach, RF exposure at B(1) (+) ≤ 2 µT generated cumulative equivalent minutes (CEM)(43) < 40 at all imaging landmarks at both 1.5 T and 3 T, indicating no thermal damage for acquisition times (TAs) < 10 min. In experiments, the maximum temperature rise when FRLs were positioned at the location of maximum electric field exposure was measured to be 2.4°C at 3 T and 2.1°C at 1.5 T. Electric fields induced in the tissue due to gradient‐induced voltages remained below the threshold for cardiac tissue stimulation in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation and experimental results indicate that patients with FRLs can be scanned safely at both 1.5 T and 3 T with most clinical pulse sequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-27 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8919805/ /pubmed/34958685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29116 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
Nguyen, Bach T.
Bhusal, Bhumi
Rahsepar, Amir Ali
Fawcett, Kate
Lin, Stella
Marks, Daniel S.
Passman, Rod
Nieto, Donny
Niemzcura, Richard
Golestanirad, Laleh
Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title_full Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title_fullStr Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title_full_unstemmed Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title_short Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads
title_sort safety of mri in patients with retained cardiac leads
topic Research Articles—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34958685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29116
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenbacht safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT bhusalbhumi safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT rahseparamirali safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT fawcettkate safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT linstella safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT marksdaniels safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT passmanrod safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT nietodonny safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT niemzcurarichard safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads
AT golestaniradlaleh safetyofmriinpatientswithretainedcardiacleads