Cargando…

Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to explore the test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment. We searched through five databases to find studies that examined the test-retest reliability of peak force in the isometric mid-thigh pull exercise. From each include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grgic, Jozo, Scapec, Bela, Mikulic, Pavle, Pedisic, Zeljko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35309521
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106149
_version_ 1784669014219292672
author Grgic, Jozo
Scapec, Bela
Mikulic, Pavle
Pedisic, Zeljko
author_facet Grgic, Jozo
Scapec, Bela
Mikulic, Pavle
Pedisic, Zeljko
author_sort Grgic, Jozo
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review was to explore the test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment. We searched through five databases to find studies that examined the test-retest reliability of peak force in the isometric mid-thigh pull exercise. From each included study, we extracted intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and/or coefficient of variation (CV). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. A total of 16 good-to-excellent quality studies were included in the review. When considering results from all included studies, ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.99 (median ICC = 0.96), where 78% of ICCs were ≥ 0.90, and 98% of ICCs were ≥ 0.75. The range of reported CVs was from 0.7% to 11.1% (median CV = 4.9%), where 58% of CVs were ≤ 5%. Reliability was also good-to-excellent for both relative and absolute peak force and for both bilateral and unilateral isometric mid-thigh pull tests. The majority of studies did not find significant differences between testing sessions. It can be concluded that the isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment has good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment can be used as a reliable test in sports practice and for research purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8919882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89198822022-03-18 Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review Grgic, Jozo Scapec, Bela Mikulic, Pavle Pedisic, Zeljko Biol Sport Review Paper The aim of this systematic review was to explore the test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment. We searched through five databases to find studies that examined the test-retest reliability of peak force in the isometric mid-thigh pull exercise. From each included study, we extracted intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and/or coefficient of variation (CV). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. A total of 16 good-to-excellent quality studies were included in the review. When considering results from all included studies, ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.99 (median ICC = 0.96), where 78% of ICCs were ≥ 0.90, and 98% of ICCs were ≥ 0.75. The range of reported CVs was from 0.7% to 11.1% (median CV = 4.9%), where 58% of CVs were ≤ 5%. Reliability was also good-to-excellent for both relative and absolute peak force and for both bilateral and unilateral isometric mid-thigh pull tests. The majority of studies did not find significant differences between testing sessions. It can be concluded that the isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment has good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment can be used as a reliable test in sports practice and for research purposes. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021-06-01 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8919882/ /pubmed/35309521 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106149 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Grgic, Jozo
Scapec, Bela
Mikulic, Pavle
Pedisic, Zeljko
Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title_full Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title_short Test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
title_sort test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment: a systematic review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35309521
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106149
work_keys_str_mv AT grgicjozo testretestreliabilityofisometricmidthighpullmaximumstrengthassessmentasystematicreview
AT scapecbela testretestreliabilityofisometricmidthighpullmaximumstrengthassessmentasystematicreview
AT mikulicpavle testretestreliabilityofisometricmidthighpullmaximumstrengthassessmentasystematicreview
AT pedisiczeljko testretestreliabilityofisometricmidthighpullmaximumstrengthassessmentasystematicreview