Cargando…
A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts
The high failure rate (46%) of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is well-documented. There is limited research examining the effect of forces/pulls on PIVC complications. New breakaway connectors called force-activated separation devices (FASD) separate when a damaging force is placed on a PI...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000455 |
_version_ | 1784669038381629440 |
---|---|
author | Panza, Gregory A. Steere, Lee Steinberg, Adam C. |
author_facet | Panza, Gregory A. Steere, Lee Steinberg, Adam C. |
author_sort | Panza, Gregory A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The high failure rate (46%) of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is well-documented. There is limited research examining the effect of forces/pulls on PIVC complications. New breakaway connectors called force-activated separation devices (FASD) separate when a damaging force is placed on a PIVC. In a randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned 1:1 to a control group receiving PIVC standard of care (SOC) or SOC with FASD added to the catheter. The primary outcome was total mechanical complications requiring a PIVC restart. Secondary outcomes were delay in therapy, PIVC restarts, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared in an intention-to-treat analysis (N = 302) and per-protocol analysis (N = 287). There were less total mechanical complications in FASD compared with SOC (22 vs 41, respectively; P < .01). The treatment group was a predictor of total delay in therapy (minutes), indicating a greater estimated total delay in therapy in SOC than FASD (B = 69.53; 95% CI, 28.32–110.73; P = .001). There were more adverse events in SOC (127) than FASD (76; P = .001). Results were consistent in the per-protocol analysis. Use of a FASD showed a reduction in total mechanical complications. These results support use of the FASD as a safer and time-saving alternative to current SOC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89200132022-03-18 A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts Panza, Gregory A. Steere, Lee Steinberg, Adam C. J Infus Nurs Features The high failure rate (46%) of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is well-documented. There is limited research examining the effect of forces/pulls on PIVC complications. New breakaway connectors called force-activated separation devices (FASD) separate when a damaging force is placed on a PIVC. In a randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned 1:1 to a control group receiving PIVC standard of care (SOC) or SOC with FASD added to the catheter. The primary outcome was total mechanical complications requiring a PIVC restart. Secondary outcomes were delay in therapy, PIVC restarts, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared in an intention-to-treat analysis (N = 302) and per-protocol analysis (N = 287). There were less total mechanical complications in FASD compared with SOC (22 vs 41, respectively; P < .01). The treatment group was a predictor of total delay in therapy (minutes), indicating a greater estimated total delay in therapy in SOC than FASD (B = 69.53; 95% CI, 28.32–110.73; P = .001). There were more adverse events in SOC (127) than FASD (76; P = .001). Results were consistent in the per-protocol analysis. Use of a FASD showed a reduction in total mechanical complications. These results support use of the FASD as a safer and time-saving alternative to current SOC. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022-03 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8920013/ /pubmed/35272303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000455 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Infusion Nurses Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Features Panza, Gregory A. Steere, Lee Steinberg, Adam C. A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title | A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title_full | A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title_fullStr | A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title_short | A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts |
title_sort | new force-activated separation device for the prevention of peripheral intravenous restarts |
topic | Features |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panzagregorya anewforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts AT steerelee anewforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts AT steinbergadamc anewforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts AT panzagregorya newforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts AT steerelee newforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts AT steinbergadamc newforceactivatedseparationdeviceforthepreventionofperipheralintravenousrestarts |