Cargando…

Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries

Insight in differences in patient outcomes between endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers can help to improve stroke care. We assessed between-center variation in functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with EVT. We analyzed to what extent this variation may be ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Paula M., van Overhagen, Katrine, Vinklárek, Jan, Roozenbeek, Bob, van der Worp, H. Bart, Majoie, Charles B., Bar, Michal, Černík, David, Herzig, Roman, Jurák, Lubomir, Ostrý, Svatopluk, Mikulik, Robert, Lingsma, Hester F., Dippel, Diederik W.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008180
_version_ 1784669040576299008
author Janssen, Paula M.
van Overhagen, Katrine
Vinklárek, Jan
Roozenbeek, Bob
van der Worp, H. Bart
Majoie, Charles B.
Bar, Michal
Černík, David
Herzig, Roman
Jurák, Lubomir
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Mikulik, Robert
Lingsma, Hester F.
Dippel, Diederik W.J.
author_facet Janssen, Paula M.
van Overhagen, Katrine
Vinklárek, Jan
Roozenbeek, Bob
van der Worp, H. Bart
Majoie, Charles B.
Bar, Michal
Černík, David
Herzig, Roman
Jurák, Lubomir
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Mikulik, Robert
Lingsma, Hester F.
Dippel, Diederik W.J.
author_sort Janssen, Paula M.
collection PubMed
description Insight in differences in patient outcomes between endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers can help to improve stroke care. We assessed between-center variation in functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with EVT. We analyzed to what extent this variation may be explained by modifiable center characteristics. METHODS: We used nationwide registry data of patients with stroke treated with EVT in the Netherlands and in the Czech Republic. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days as an indicator of disability. We used multilevel ordinal logistic regression to quantify the between-center variation in outcomes and the impact of patient and center characteristics. Between-center variation was expressed as the relative difference in odds of a more favorable modified Rankin Scale score between a relatively better performing center (75th percentile) and a relatively worse performing center (25th percentile). RESULTS: We included a total of 4518 patients treated in 33 centers. Adjusted for patient characteristics, the odds of a more favorable outcome in a center at the 75th percentile of the outcome distribution were 1.46 times higher (95% CI, 1.31–1.70) than the odds in a center at the 25th percentile. Adjustment for center characteristics, including the median time between stroke onset and reperfusion per center, decreased this relative difference in odds to 1.30 (95% CI, 1.18–1.50, P=0.01). This translates into an absolute difference in likelihood of good functional outcome of 8% after adjustment for patient characteristics and to 5% after further adjustment for modifiable center characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable between-center variation in patient outcomes after EVT for acute ischemic stroke could be largely explained by center-specific characteristics, such as time to reperfusion. Improvement of these parameters may likely result in a decrease in center-specific differences, and an overall improvement in outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8920023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89200232022-03-18 Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries Janssen, Paula M. van Overhagen, Katrine Vinklárek, Jan Roozenbeek, Bob van der Worp, H. Bart Majoie, Charles B. Bar, Michal Černík, David Herzig, Roman Jurák, Lubomir Ostrý, Svatopluk Mikulik, Robert Lingsma, Hester F. Dippel, Diederik W.J. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Original Articles Insight in differences in patient outcomes between endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers can help to improve stroke care. We assessed between-center variation in functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with EVT. We analyzed to what extent this variation may be explained by modifiable center characteristics. METHODS: We used nationwide registry data of patients with stroke treated with EVT in the Netherlands and in the Czech Republic. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days as an indicator of disability. We used multilevel ordinal logistic regression to quantify the between-center variation in outcomes and the impact of patient and center characteristics. Between-center variation was expressed as the relative difference in odds of a more favorable modified Rankin Scale score between a relatively better performing center (75th percentile) and a relatively worse performing center (25th percentile). RESULTS: We included a total of 4518 patients treated in 33 centers. Adjusted for patient characteristics, the odds of a more favorable outcome in a center at the 75th percentile of the outcome distribution were 1.46 times higher (95% CI, 1.31–1.70) than the odds in a center at the 25th percentile. Adjustment for center characteristics, including the median time between stroke onset and reperfusion per center, decreased this relative difference in odds to 1.30 (95% CI, 1.18–1.50, P=0.01). This translates into an absolute difference in likelihood of good functional outcome of 8% after adjustment for patient characteristics and to 5% after further adjustment for modifiable center characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable between-center variation in patient outcomes after EVT for acute ischemic stroke could be largely explained by center-specific characteristics, such as time to reperfusion. Improvement of these parameters may likely result in a decrease in center-specific differences, and an overall improvement in outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8920023/ /pubmed/35094522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008180 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Janssen, Paula M.
van Overhagen, Katrine
Vinklárek, Jan
Roozenbeek, Bob
van der Worp, H. Bart
Majoie, Charles B.
Bar, Michal
Černík, David
Herzig, Roman
Jurák, Lubomir
Ostrý, Svatopluk
Mikulik, Robert
Lingsma, Hester F.
Dippel, Diederik W.J.
Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title_full Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title_fullStr Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title_full_unstemmed Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title_short Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
title_sort between-center variation in outcome after endovascular treatment of acute stroke: analysis of two nationwide registries
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008180
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenpaulam betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT vanoverhagenkatrine betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT vinklarekjan betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT roozenbeekbob betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT vanderworphbart betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT majoiecharlesb betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT barmichal betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT cernikdavid betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT herzigroman betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT juraklubomir betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT ostrysvatopluk betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT mikulikrobert betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT lingsmahesterf betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries
AT dippeldiederikwj betweencentervariationinoutcomeafterendovasculartreatmentofacutestrokeanalysisoftwonationwideregistries