Cargando…
Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review
M-M-R®(II) (M-M-R II) is routinely used in many countries at 12–15 months with a second dose at 4 to 6 years of age. However, the vaccine may need to be administered at other ages due to delays in the immunization schedule or in certain situations such as outbreaks or international travel. A systema...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1933874 |
_version_ | 1784669062312230912 |
---|---|
author | Pawaskar, Manjiri Schmidt, Elvira Marshall, Gary S. Fergie, Jaime Richardson, Elizabeth Saldutti, Louise Parks Li, Se Neumann, Monika Koller, Linnea Kuter, Barbara |
author_facet | Pawaskar, Manjiri Schmidt, Elvira Marshall, Gary S. Fergie, Jaime Richardson, Elizabeth Saldutti, Louise Parks Li, Se Neumann, Monika Koller, Linnea Kuter, Barbara |
author_sort | Pawaskar, Manjiri |
collection | PubMed |
description | M-M-R®(II) (M-M-R II) is routinely used in many countries at 12–15 months with a second dose at 4 to 6 years of age. However, the vaccine may need to be administered at other ages due to delays in the immunization schedule or in certain situations such as outbreaks or international travel. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of M-M-R II among 6- to 11-month-olds and persons ≥7 years of age. A search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in 2019 including Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Only one study reported seroconversion rates after one dose in infants at 9 months of age: 87.4% (measles), 92.3% (mumps), and 91.2% (rubella); no safety data were reported. Seven studies reported immunogenicity and safety data for M-M-R II at ≥7 years of age. Seroconversion rates ranged from 96%-100% (measles), 65%-100% (mumps), and 91%-100% (rubella). Rates of selected adverse events ranged from 5.2%-8.7% for fever (≥38°C or ≥38.1°C), 2%-33.3% for injection site reactions, and 0.4% for measles/rubella-like rash (one study). No efficacy studies were found. This literature review identified RCTs with evidence to support that M-M-R II is immunogenic and well tolerated in individuals ≥7 years of age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89201382022-03-15 Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review Pawaskar, Manjiri Schmidt, Elvira Marshall, Gary S. Fergie, Jaime Richardson, Elizabeth Saldutti, Louise Parks Li, Se Neumann, Monika Koller, Linnea Kuter, Barbara Hum Vaccin Immunother Licensed Vaccines – Short Report M-M-R®(II) (M-M-R II) is routinely used in many countries at 12–15 months with a second dose at 4 to 6 years of age. However, the vaccine may need to be administered at other ages due to delays in the immunization schedule or in certain situations such as outbreaks or international travel. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of M-M-R II among 6- to 11-month-olds and persons ≥7 years of age. A search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in 2019 including Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Only one study reported seroconversion rates after one dose in infants at 9 months of age: 87.4% (measles), 92.3% (mumps), and 91.2% (rubella); no safety data were reported. Seven studies reported immunogenicity and safety data for M-M-R II at ≥7 years of age. Seroconversion rates ranged from 96%-100% (measles), 65%-100% (mumps), and 91%-100% (rubella). Rates of selected adverse events ranged from 5.2%-8.7% for fever (≥38°C or ≥38.1°C), 2%-33.3% for injection site reactions, and 0.4% for measles/rubella-like rash (one study). No efficacy studies were found. This literature review identified RCTs with evidence to support that M-M-R II is immunogenic and well tolerated in individuals ≥7 years of age. Taylor & Francis 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8920138/ /pubmed/34128759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1933874 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Licensed Vaccines – Short Report Pawaskar, Manjiri Schmidt, Elvira Marshall, Gary S. Fergie, Jaime Richardson, Elizabeth Saldutti, Louise Parks Li, Se Neumann, Monika Koller, Linnea Kuter, Barbara Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title | Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title_full | Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title_short | Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
title_sort | use of m-m-r ii outside of the routinely recommended age range – a systematic literature review |
topic | Licensed Vaccines – Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1933874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawaskarmanjiri useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT schmidtelvira useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT marshallgarys useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT fergiejaime useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT richardsonelizabeth useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT salduttilouiseparks useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT lise useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT neumannmonika useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT kollerlinnea useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview AT kuterbarbara useofmmriioutsideoftheroutinelyrecommendedagerangeasystematicliteraturereview |