Cargando…
Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety profile of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) in healthy adults (18–60 years) and elderly (>61 years) participants. METHOD: This phase III study was conducted from March 2018 to April 2018 across 12 sites in Ind...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1885278 |
_version_ | 1784669067351687168 |
---|---|
author | Basu, Indraneel Agarwal, Manish Shah, Viral Shukla, Vijay Naik, Sunil Supe, Pravin Dinkar Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Giriraja, Kanakapura Vrushabaiah Pinjar, Peersab Mishra, Pradeep Kumar Joshi, Shishir Vijayakumar, Ranjit van de Witte, Serge |
author_facet | Basu, Indraneel Agarwal, Manish Shah, Viral Shukla, Vijay Naik, Sunil Supe, Pravin Dinkar Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Giriraja, Kanakapura Vrushabaiah Pinjar, Peersab Mishra, Pradeep Kumar Joshi, Shishir Vijayakumar, Ranjit van de Witte, Serge |
author_sort | Basu, Indraneel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety profile of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) in healthy adults (18–60 years) and elderly (>61 years) participants. METHOD: This phase III study was conducted from March 2018 to April 2018 across 12 sites in India. In this randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled study, 480 participants were randomized to receive a single dose of test vaccine (subunit, inactivated influenza vaccine; Influvac® Tetra, Abbott) (n = 240) or reference vaccine (split virion, inactivated influenza vaccine; VaxiFlu-4, Zydus Cadilla Healthcare) (n = 240). The primary objective was to describe and compare the immunogenicity of each vaccination group based on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean fold increase (GMFI) against four vaccine strains in two age groups. Safety and reactogenicity were also compared for the vaccines in both the age groups. RESULTS: The pre- and post-vaccination HI titers for both the vaccines were comparable. The GMFI varied from 4.3 – 22.7 in the test and 3.7–21.6 in the reference vaccine group. The seroprotection rates were >90% for the A-strains and ranged between >43% and <60% for B-strains for both the vaccines. Seroconversion rates varied between 41.4% and 78.8%. Overall, the reported adverse events (AEs) for both the vaccines were <1% and comparable. Reported local and systemic reactions were comparable. CONCLUSION: Influvac® Tetra elicited an adequate immune response with a favorable safety profile which was comparable with the reference vaccine. (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/02/012222) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89201612022-03-15 Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study Basu, Indraneel Agarwal, Manish Shah, Viral Shukla, Vijay Naik, Sunil Supe, Pravin Dinkar Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Giriraja, Kanakapura Vrushabaiah Pinjar, Peersab Mishra, Pradeep Kumar Joshi, Shishir Vijayakumar, Ranjit van de Witte, Serge Hum Vaccin Immunother Influenza – Research Paper BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety profile of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) in healthy adults (18–60 years) and elderly (>61 years) participants. METHOD: This phase III study was conducted from March 2018 to April 2018 across 12 sites in India. In this randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled study, 480 participants were randomized to receive a single dose of test vaccine (subunit, inactivated influenza vaccine; Influvac® Tetra, Abbott) (n = 240) or reference vaccine (split virion, inactivated influenza vaccine; VaxiFlu-4, Zydus Cadilla Healthcare) (n = 240). The primary objective was to describe and compare the immunogenicity of each vaccination group based on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean fold increase (GMFI) against four vaccine strains in two age groups. Safety and reactogenicity were also compared for the vaccines in both the age groups. RESULTS: The pre- and post-vaccination HI titers for both the vaccines were comparable. The GMFI varied from 4.3 – 22.7 in the test and 3.7–21.6 in the reference vaccine group. The seroprotection rates were >90% for the A-strains and ranged between >43% and <60% for B-strains for both the vaccines. Seroconversion rates varied between 41.4% and 78.8%. Overall, the reported adverse events (AEs) for both the vaccines were <1% and comparable. Reported local and systemic reactions were comparable. CONCLUSION: Influvac® Tetra elicited an adequate immune response with a favorable safety profile which was comparable with the reference vaccine. (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/02/012222) Taylor & Francis 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8920161/ /pubmed/33957854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1885278 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Influenza – Research Paper Basu, Indraneel Agarwal, Manish Shah, Viral Shukla, Vijay Naik, Sunil Supe, Pravin Dinkar Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Giriraja, Kanakapura Vrushabaiah Pinjar, Peersab Mishra, Pradeep Kumar Joshi, Shishir Vijayakumar, Ranjit van de Witte, Serge Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title | Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title_full | Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title_fullStr | Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title_short | Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
title_sort | immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in india - a phase iii, active-controlled, randomized clinical study |
topic | Influenza – Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1885278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT basuindraneel immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT agarwalmanish immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT shahviral immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT shuklavijay immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT naiksunil immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT supepravindinkar immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT srivastavamanojkumar immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT girirajakanakapuravrushabaiah immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT pinjarpeersab immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT mishrapradeepkumar immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT joshishishir immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT vijayakumarranjit immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy AT vandewitteserge immunogenicityandsafetyoftwoquadrivalentinfluenzavaccinesinhealthyadultandelderlyparticipantsinindiaaphaseiiiactivecontrolledrandomizedclinicalstudy |