Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762 |
_version_ | 1784669085947133952 |
---|---|
author | Curran, Desmond Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater Nelsen, Linda |
author_facet | Curran, Desmond Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater Nelsen, Linda |
author_sort | Curran, Desmond |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration’s publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89202462022-03-15 Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making Curran, Desmond Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater Nelsen, Linda Hum Vaccin Immunother Clinical – Review The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration’s publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary) Taylor & Francis 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8920246/ /pubmed/33606595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762 Text en © 2021 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical – Review Curran, Desmond Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater Nelsen, Linda Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title | Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making |
topic | Clinical – Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT currandesmond patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking AT cabreraeliazarsabater patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking AT nelsenlinda patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking |