Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making

The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curran, Desmond, Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater, Nelsen, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762
_version_ 1784669085947133952
author Curran, Desmond
Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater
Nelsen, Linda
author_facet Curran, Desmond
Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater
Nelsen, Linda
author_sort Curran, Desmond
collection PubMed
description The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration’s publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8920246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89202462022-03-15 Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making Curran, Desmond Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater Nelsen, Linda Hum Vaccin Immunother Clinical – Review The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration’s publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary) Taylor & Francis 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8920246/ /pubmed/33606595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762 Text en © 2021 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical – Review
Curran, Desmond
Cabrera, Eliazar Sabater
Nelsen, Linda
Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title_full Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title_short Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
title_sort patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making
topic Clinical – Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1875762
work_keys_str_mv AT currandesmond patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking
AT cabreraeliazarsabater patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking
AT nelsenlinda patientreportedoutcomesinvaccinesresearchrelevancefordecisionmaking