Cargando…

Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy

RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acar-Burkay, Sinem, Cristian, Daniela-Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911
_version_ 1784669157643517952
author Acar-Burkay, Sinem
Cristian, Daniela-Carmen
author_facet Acar-Burkay, Sinem
Cristian, Daniela-Carmen
author_sort Acar-Burkay, Sinem
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function—a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning. OBJECTIVE: We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress. METHODS: Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data. RESULTS: Individual differences in executive function predicted participants’ COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8920576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89205762022-03-15 Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy Acar-Burkay, Sinem Cristian, Daniela-Carmen Soc Sci Med Article RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function—a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning. OBJECTIVE: We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress. METHODS: Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data. RESULTS: Individual differences in executive function predicted participants’ COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-05 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8920576/ /pubmed/35395612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Acar-Burkay, Sinem
Cristian, Daniela-Carmen
Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title_full Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title_fullStr Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title_short Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
title_sort cognitive underpinnings of covid-19 vaccine hesitancy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911
work_keys_str_mv AT acarburkaysinem cognitiveunderpinningsofcovid19vaccinehesitancy
AT cristiandanielacarmen cognitiveunderpinningsofcovid19vaccinehesitancy