Cargando…
Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitanc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911 |
_version_ | 1784669157643517952 |
---|---|
author | Acar-Burkay, Sinem Cristian, Daniela-Carmen |
author_facet | Acar-Burkay, Sinem Cristian, Daniela-Carmen |
author_sort | Acar-Burkay, Sinem |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function—a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning. OBJECTIVE: We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress. METHODS: Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data. RESULTS: Individual differences in executive function predicted participants’ COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89205762022-03-15 Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy Acar-Burkay, Sinem Cristian, Daniela-Carmen Soc Sci Med Article RATIONALE: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function—a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning. OBJECTIVE: We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress. METHODS: Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data. RESULTS: Individual differences in executive function predicted participants’ COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-05 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8920576/ /pubmed/35395612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Acar-Burkay, Sinem Cristian, Daniela-Carmen Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title | Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title_full | Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title_fullStr | Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title_short | Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy |
title_sort | cognitive underpinnings of covid-19 vaccine hesitancy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acarburkaysinem cognitiveunderpinningsofcovid19vaccinehesitancy AT cristiandanielacarmen cognitiveunderpinningsofcovid19vaccinehesitancy |