Cargando…

Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates

Background and study aims  Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keswani, Rajesh N., Wood, Mariah, Benson, Mark, Gawron, Andrew J., Kahi, Charles, Kaltenbach, Tonya, Yadlapati, Rena, Gregory, Dyanna, Duloy, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574
_version_ 1784669159948288000
author Keswani, Rajesh N.
Wood, Mariah
Benson, Mark
Gawron, Andrew J.
Kahi, Charles
Kaltenbach, Tonya
Yadlapati, Rena
Gregory, Dyanna
Duloy, Anna
author_facet Keswani, Rajesh N.
Wood, Mariah
Benson, Mark
Gawron, Andrew J.
Kahi, Charles
Kaltenbach, Tonya
Yadlapati, Rena
Gregory, Dyanna
Duloy, Anna
author_sort Keswani, Rajesh N.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods  We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results  Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P  = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P  = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P  < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P  = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P  = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions  CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8920595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89205952022-03-15 Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates Keswani, Rajesh N. Wood, Mariah Benson, Mark Gawron, Andrew J. Kahi, Charles Kaltenbach, Tonya Yadlapati, Rena Gregory, Dyanna Duloy, Anna Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods  We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results  Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P  = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P  = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P  < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P  = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P  = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions  CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8920595/ /pubmed/35295238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Keswani, Rajesh N.
Wood, Mariah
Benson, Mark
Gawron, Andrew J.
Kahi, Charles
Kaltenbach, Tonya
Yadlapati, Rena
Gregory, Dyanna
Duloy, Anna
Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title_full Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title_fullStr Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title_full_unstemmed Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title_short Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
title_sort individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574
work_keys_str_mv AT keswanirajeshn individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT woodmariah individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT bensonmark individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT gawronandrewj individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT kahicharles individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT kaltenbachtonya individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT yadlapatirena individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT gregorydyanna individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates
AT duloyanna individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates