Cargando…
Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574 |
_version_ | 1784669159948288000 |
---|---|
author | Keswani, Rajesh N. Wood, Mariah Benson, Mark Gawron, Andrew J. Kahi, Charles Kaltenbach, Tonya Yadlapati, Rena Gregory, Dyanna Duloy, Anna |
author_facet | Keswani, Rajesh N. Wood, Mariah Benson, Mark Gawron, Andrew J. Kahi, Charles Kaltenbach, Tonya Yadlapati, Rena Gregory, Dyanna Duloy, Anna |
author_sort | Keswani, Rajesh N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8920595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89205952022-03-15 Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates Keswani, Rajesh N. Wood, Mariah Benson, Mark Gawron, Andrew J. Kahi, Charles Kaltenbach, Tonya Yadlapati, Rena Gregory, Dyanna Duloy, Anna Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8920595/ /pubmed/35295238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Keswani, Rajesh N. Wood, Mariah Benson, Mark Gawron, Andrew J. Kahi, Charles Kaltenbach, Tonya Yadlapati, Rena Gregory, Dyanna Duloy, Anna Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title | Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title_full | Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title_fullStr | Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title_full_unstemmed | Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title_short | Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
title_sort | individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8920595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keswanirajeshn individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT woodmariah individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT bensonmark individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT gawronandrewj individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT kahicharles individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT kaltenbachtonya individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT yadlapatirena individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT gregorydyanna individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates AT duloyanna individualizedfeedbackoncolonoscopyskillsimprovesgroupcolonoscopyqualityinproviderswithloweradenomadetectionrates |