Cargando…

Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30

PURPOSE: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a widely used generic self-report measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for cancer patients. However, no validated voice script for interviewer-led telephone ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piccinin, Claire, Pe, Madeline, Kuliś, Dagmara, Shaw, James W., Wheelwright, Sally J., Bottomley, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02955-6
_version_ 1784669250432008192
author Piccinin, Claire
Pe, Madeline
Kuliś, Dagmara
Shaw, James W.
Wheelwright, Sally J.
Bottomley, Andrew
author_facet Piccinin, Claire
Pe, Madeline
Kuliś, Dagmara
Shaw, James W.
Wheelwright, Sally J.
Bottomley, Andrew
author_sort Piccinin, Claire
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a widely used generic self-report measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for cancer patients. However, no validated voice script for interviewer-led telephone administration was previously available. The aim of this study was to develop a voice script for interviewer administration via telephone. METHODS: Following guidelines from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) PRO Mixed Modes Good Research Practices Task Force, a randomised cross-over equivalence study, including cognitive debriefing, was conducted to assess equivalence between paper and telephone administration modes. Assuming an expected intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.70 and a minimally acceptable level of 0.50, a sample size of 63 was required. RESULTS: Cognitive interviews with five cancer patients found the voice script to be clear and understandable. Due to a protocol deviation in the first wave of testing, only 26 patients were available for analyses. A second wave of recruitment was conducted, adding 37 patients (n = 63; mean age 55.48; 65.1% female). Total ICCs for mode comparison ranged from 0.72 (nausea and vomiting, 95% CI 0.48–0.86) to 0.90 (global health status/QoL, 95% CI 0.80–0.95; pain, 95% CI 0.79–0.95; constipation, 95% CI 0.80–0.95). For paper first administration, all ICCs were above 0.70, except nausea and vomiting (ICC 0.55; 95% CI 0.24–0.76) and financial difficulties (ICC 0.60; 95% CI 0.31–0.79). For phone first administration, all ICCs were above 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The equivalence testing results support the voice script’s validity for administration of the QLQ-C30 via telephone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02955-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89210392022-03-17 Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30 Piccinin, Claire Pe, Madeline Kuliś, Dagmara Shaw, James W. Wheelwright, Sally J. Bottomley, Andrew Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a widely used generic self-report measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for cancer patients. However, no validated voice script for interviewer-led telephone administration was previously available. The aim of this study was to develop a voice script for interviewer administration via telephone. METHODS: Following guidelines from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) PRO Mixed Modes Good Research Practices Task Force, a randomised cross-over equivalence study, including cognitive debriefing, was conducted to assess equivalence between paper and telephone administration modes. Assuming an expected intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.70 and a minimally acceptable level of 0.50, a sample size of 63 was required. RESULTS: Cognitive interviews with five cancer patients found the voice script to be clear and understandable. Due to a protocol deviation in the first wave of testing, only 26 patients were available for analyses. A second wave of recruitment was conducted, adding 37 patients (n = 63; mean age 55.48; 65.1% female). Total ICCs for mode comparison ranged from 0.72 (nausea and vomiting, 95% CI 0.48–0.86) to 0.90 (global health status/QoL, 95% CI 0.80–0.95; pain, 95% CI 0.79–0.95; constipation, 95% CI 0.80–0.95). For paper first administration, all ICCs were above 0.70, except nausea and vomiting (ICC 0.55; 95% CI 0.24–0.76) and financial difficulties (ICC 0.60; 95% CI 0.31–0.79). For phone first administration, all ICCs were above 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The equivalence testing results support the voice script’s validity for administration of the QLQ-C30 via telephone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02955-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921039/ /pubmed/34286416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02955-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Piccinin, Claire
Pe, Madeline
Kuliś, Dagmara
Shaw, James W.
Wheelwright, Sally J.
Bottomley, Andrew
Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title_full Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title_fullStr Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title_full_unstemmed Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title_short Equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the EORTC QLQ-C30
title_sort equivalence testing of a newly developed interviewer-led telephone script for the eortc qlq-c30
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02955-6
work_keys_str_mv AT piccininclaire equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30
AT pemadeline equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30
AT kulisdagmara equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30
AT shawjamesw equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30
AT wheelwrightsallyj equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30
AT bottomleyandrew equivalencetestingofanewlydevelopedinterviewerledtelephonescriptfortheeortcqlqc30