Cargando…
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to addi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8 |
_version_ | 1784669267538477056 |
---|---|
author | Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. Jänsch, Alexander Hacker, Astrid Weinand, Sina Vogelmann, Tobias |
author_facet | Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. Jänsch, Alexander Hacker, Astrid Weinand, Sina Vogelmann, Tobias |
author_sort | Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20–1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64–0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45–1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08–2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17–1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low. CONCLUSION: Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone—resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89211142022-03-17 Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. Jänsch, Alexander Hacker, Astrid Weinand, Sina Vogelmann, Tobias Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20–1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64–0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45–1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08–2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17–1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low. CONCLUSION: Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone—resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921114/ /pubmed/34694451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. Jänsch, Alexander Hacker, Astrid Weinand, Sina Vogelmann, Tobias Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | digital breast tomosynthesis (dbt) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2d) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (dm) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heywangkobrunnersylviah digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT janschalexander digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hackerastrid digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weinandsina digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vogelmanntobias digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |