Cargando…

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to addi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H., Jänsch, Alexander, Hacker, Astrid, Weinand, Sina, Vogelmann, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8
_version_ 1784669267538477056
author Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.
Jänsch, Alexander
Hacker, Astrid
Weinand, Sina
Vogelmann, Tobias
author_facet Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.
Jänsch, Alexander
Hacker, Astrid
Weinand, Sina
Vogelmann, Tobias
author_sort Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20–1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64–0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45–1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08–2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17–1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low. CONCLUSION: Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone—resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89211142022-03-17 Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H. Jänsch, Alexander Hacker, Astrid Weinand, Sina Vogelmann, Tobias Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20–1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64–0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45–1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08–2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17–1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low. CONCLUSION: Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone—resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921114/ /pubmed/34694451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast
Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.
Jänsch, Alexander
Hacker, Astrid
Weinand, Sina
Vogelmann, Tobias
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort digital breast tomosynthesis (dbt) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2d) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (dm) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8
work_keys_str_mv AT heywangkobrunnersylviah digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT janschalexander digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hackerastrid digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weinandsina digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vogelmanntobias digitalbreasttomosynthesisdbtplussynthesisedtwodimensionalmammographys2dinbreastcancerscreeningisassociatedwithhighercancerdetectionandlowerrecallscomparedtodigitalmammographydmaloneresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis