Cargando…
A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by target...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3 |
_version_ | 1784669274546110464 |
---|---|
author | Derigs, Fabian Doryumu, Samuel Tollens, Fabian Nörenberg, Dominik Neuberger, Manuel von Hardenberg, Jost Michel, Maurice Stephan Ritter, Manuel Westhoff, Niklas |
author_facet | Derigs, Fabian Doryumu, Samuel Tollens, Fabian Nörenberg, Dominik Neuberger, Manuel von Hardenberg, Jost Michel, Maurice Stephan Ritter, Manuel Westhoff, Niklas |
author_sort | Derigs, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by targeting the same MRI-lesions by different urologists. METHODS: In this prospective study, 142 patients eligible for analysis underwent software-based FB. TB of all lesions (n = 172) were carried out by two different urologists per patient (n = 31 urologists). We analyzed the number of mismatches [overall prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and non-significant PCa (nsPCa)] between both performed TB per patient. In addition we evaluated factors contributing to inter-operator variability by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In 11.6% of all MRI-lesions (10.6% of all patients) there was a mismatch between TB1 and TB2 in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa detection. Regarding csPCa, patient-based mismatch occurred in 14.8% (n = 21). Overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of TB1 and TB2 did not differ significantly on a per-patient and per-lesion level. Analyses revealed a smaller lesion size as predictive for mismatches (OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.02–41.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility and precision of targeting particularly small lesions is still limited although using software-based FB. Further improvements in image-fusion, segmentation, needle-guidance, and automatization are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89211472022-03-17 A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies Derigs, Fabian Doryumu, Samuel Tollens, Fabian Nörenberg, Dominik Neuberger, Manuel von Hardenberg, Jost Michel, Maurice Stephan Ritter, Manuel Westhoff, Niklas World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by targeting the same MRI-lesions by different urologists. METHODS: In this prospective study, 142 patients eligible for analysis underwent software-based FB. TB of all lesions (n = 172) were carried out by two different urologists per patient (n = 31 urologists). We analyzed the number of mismatches [overall prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and non-significant PCa (nsPCa)] between both performed TB per patient. In addition we evaluated factors contributing to inter-operator variability by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In 11.6% of all MRI-lesions (10.6% of all patients) there was a mismatch between TB1 and TB2 in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa detection. Regarding csPCa, patient-based mismatch occurred in 14.8% (n = 21). Overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of TB1 and TB2 did not differ significantly on a per-patient and per-lesion level. Analyses revealed a smaller lesion size as predictive for mismatches (OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.02–41.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility and precision of targeting particularly small lesions is still limited although using software-based FB. Further improvements in image-fusion, segmentation, needle-guidance, and automatization are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921147/ /pubmed/34825944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Derigs, Fabian Doryumu, Samuel Tollens, Fabian Nörenberg, Dominik Neuberger, Manuel von Hardenberg, Jost Michel, Maurice Stephan Ritter, Manuel Westhoff, Niklas A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title | A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title_full | A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title_fullStr | A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title_short | A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
title_sort | prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based mri/trus-fusion targeted prostate biopsies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derigsfabian aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT doryumusamuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT tollensfabian aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT norenbergdominik aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT neubergermanuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT vonhardenbergjost aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT michelmauricestephan aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT rittermanuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT westhoffniklas aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT derigsfabian prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT doryumusamuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT tollensfabian prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT norenbergdominik prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT neubergermanuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT vonhardenbergjost prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT michelmauricestephan prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT rittermanuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies AT westhoffniklas prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies |