Cargando…

A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derigs, Fabian, Doryumu, Samuel, Tollens, Fabian, Nörenberg, Dominik, Neuberger, Manuel, von Hardenberg, Jost, Michel, Maurice Stephan, Ritter, Manuel, Westhoff, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3
_version_ 1784669274546110464
author Derigs, Fabian
Doryumu, Samuel
Tollens, Fabian
Nörenberg, Dominik
Neuberger, Manuel
von Hardenberg, Jost
Michel, Maurice Stephan
Ritter, Manuel
Westhoff, Niklas
author_facet Derigs, Fabian
Doryumu, Samuel
Tollens, Fabian
Nörenberg, Dominik
Neuberger, Manuel
von Hardenberg, Jost
Michel, Maurice Stephan
Ritter, Manuel
Westhoff, Niklas
author_sort Derigs, Fabian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by targeting the same MRI-lesions by different urologists. METHODS: In this prospective study, 142 patients eligible for analysis underwent software-based FB. TB of all lesions (n = 172) were carried out by two different urologists per patient (n = 31 urologists). We analyzed the number of mismatches [overall prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and non-significant PCa (nsPCa)] between both performed TB per patient. In addition we evaluated factors contributing to inter-operator variability by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In 11.6% of all MRI-lesions (10.6% of all patients) there was a mismatch between TB1 and TB2 in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa detection. Regarding csPCa, patient-based mismatch occurred in 14.8% (n = 21). Overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of TB1 and TB2 did not differ significantly on a per-patient and per-lesion level. Analyses revealed a smaller lesion size as predictive for mismatches (OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.02–41.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility and precision of targeting particularly small lesions is still limited although using software-based FB. Further improvements in image-fusion, segmentation, needle-guidance, and automatization are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89211472022-03-17 A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies Derigs, Fabian Doryumu, Samuel Tollens, Fabian Nörenberg, Dominik Neuberger, Manuel von Hardenberg, Jost Michel, Maurice Stephan Ritter, Manuel Westhoff, Niklas World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by targeting the same MRI-lesions by different urologists. METHODS: In this prospective study, 142 patients eligible for analysis underwent software-based FB. TB of all lesions (n = 172) were carried out by two different urologists per patient (n = 31 urologists). We analyzed the number of mismatches [overall prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and non-significant PCa (nsPCa)] between both performed TB per patient. In addition we evaluated factors contributing to inter-operator variability by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In 11.6% of all MRI-lesions (10.6% of all patients) there was a mismatch between TB1 and TB2 in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa detection. Regarding csPCa, patient-based mismatch occurred in 14.8% (n = 21). Overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of TB1 and TB2 did not differ significantly on a per-patient and per-lesion level. Analyses revealed a smaller lesion size as predictive for mismatches (OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.02–41.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility and precision of targeting particularly small lesions is still limited although using software-based FB. Further improvements in image-fusion, segmentation, needle-guidance, and automatization are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921147/ /pubmed/34825944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Derigs, Fabian
Doryumu, Samuel
Tollens, Fabian
Nörenberg, Dominik
Neuberger, Manuel
von Hardenberg, Jost
Michel, Maurice Stephan
Ritter, Manuel
Westhoff, Niklas
A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title_full A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title_fullStr A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title_short A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
title_sort prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based mri/trus-fusion targeted prostate biopsies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3
work_keys_str_mv AT derigsfabian aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT doryumusamuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT tollensfabian aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT norenbergdominik aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT neubergermanuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT vonhardenbergjost aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT michelmauricestephan aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT rittermanuel aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT westhoffniklas aprospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT derigsfabian prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT doryumusamuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT tollensfabian prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT norenbergdominik prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT neubergermanuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT vonhardenbergjost prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT michelmauricestephan prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT rittermanuel prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies
AT westhoffniklas prospectivestudyoninteroperatorvariabilityinsemiroboticsoftwarebasedmritrusfusiontargetedprostatebiopsies