Cargando…
UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology. METHODS: We develo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4 |
_version_ | 1784669278167891968 |
---|---|
author | Milone, Marco Adamina, Michel Arezzo, Alberto Bejinariu, Nona Boni, Luigi Bouvy, Nicole de Lacy, F Borja Dresen, Raphaëla Ferentinos, Konstantinos Francis, Nader K. Mahaffey, Joe Penna, Marta Theodoropoulos, George Kontouli, Katerina Maria Mavridis, Dimitris Vandvik, Per Olav Antoniou, Stavros A. |
author_facet | Milone, Marco Adamina, Michel Arezzo, Alberto Bejinariu, Nona Boni, Luigi Bouvy, Nicole de Lacy, F Borja Dresen, Raphaëla Ferentinos, Konstantinos Francis, Nader K. Mahaffey, Joe Penna, Marta Theodoropoulos, George Kontouli, Katerina Maria Mavridis, Dimitris Vandvik, Per Olav Antoniou, Stavros A. |
author_sort | Milone, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology. METHODS: We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE, G-I-N, and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of four general surgeons practicing colorectal surgery, a radiologist with expertise in rectal cancer, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, and a patient representative. We conducted a systematic review and the results of evidence synthesis by means of meta-analyses were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus. RESULTS: This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation for the use of TaTME over laparoscopic or robotic TME for low rectal cancer when expertise is available. Furthermore, it details evidence gaps to be addressed by future research and discusses policy considerations. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries, and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the use of TaTME for rectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89211632022-03-17 UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer Milone, Marco Adamina, Michel Arezzo, Alberto Bejinariu, Nona Boni, Luigi Bouvy, Nicole de Lacy, F Borja Dresen, Raphaëla Ferentinos, Konstantinos Francis, Nader K. Mahaffey, Joe Penna, Marta Theodoropoulos, George Kontouli, Katerina Maria Mavridis, Dimitris Vandvik, Per Olav Antoniou, Stavros A. Surg Endosc Guidelines BACKGROUND: Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology. METHODS: We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE, G-I-N, and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of four general surgeons practicing colorectal surgery, a radiologist with expertise in rectal cancer, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, and a patient representative. We conducted a systematic review and the results of evidence synthesis by means of meta-analyses were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus. RESULTS: This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation for the use of TaTME over laparoscopic or robotic TME for low rectal cancer when expertise is available. Furthermore, it details evidence gaps to be addressed by future research and discusses policy considerations. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries, and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the use of TaTME for rectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4. Springer US 2022-02-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8921163/ /pubmed/35212821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Guidelines Milone, Marco Adamina, Michel Arezzo, Alberto Bejinariu, Nona Boni, Luigi Bouvy, Nicole de Lacy, F Borja Dresen, Raphaëla Ferentinos, Konstantinos Francis, Nader K. Mahaffey, Joe Penna, Marta Theodoropoulos, George Kontouli, Katerina Maria Mavridis, Dimitris Vandvik, Per Olav Antoniou, Stavros A. UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title | UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title_full | UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title_short | UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer |
title_sort | ueg and eaes rapid guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, grade assessment and evidence-informed european recommendations on tatme for rectal cancer |
topic | Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milonemarco uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT adaminamichel uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT arezzoalberto uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT bejinariunona uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT boniluigi uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT bouvynicole uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT delacyfborja uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT dresenraphaela uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT ferentinoskonstantinos uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT francisnaderk uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT mahaffeyjoe uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT pennamarta uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT theodoropoulosgeorge uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT kontoulikaterinamaria uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT mavridisdimitris uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT vandvikperolav uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer AT antonioustavrosa uegandeaesrapidguidelinesystematicreviewmetaanalysisgradeassessmentandevidenceinformedeuropeanrecommendationsontatmeforrectalcancer |