Cargando…

The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study

BACKGROUND: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can cause an over- or underestimation of tissue activity concentration due to limitations in spatial resolution compared to the structures under study. This is commonly referred to as partial volume effect (PVE). Ideally, the PVE should...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grings, Andreas, Jobic, Camille, Kuwert, Torsten, Ritt, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00446-2
_version_ 1784669317942476800
author Grings, Andreas
Jobic, Camille
Kuwert, Torsten
Ritt, Philipp
author_facet Grings, Andreas
Jobic, Camille
Kuwert, Torsten
Ritt, Philipp
author_sort Grings, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can cause an over- or underestimation of tissue activity concentration due to limitations in spatial resolution compared to the structures under study. This is commonly referred to as partial volume effect (PVE). Ideally, the PVE should be controlled for and corrected. One such correction method involves determining recovery coefficients (RC) from phantom measurements. In the literature, several studies applying simplified geometries are available. In this study, we aimed to determine kidney PVE for realistic kidney geometries. Furthermore, we proposed a new surrogate metric for predicting the extent of PVE in kidneys. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on patients’ CT data, we manufactured fillable phantoms using a 3D-printer. Nine cortex-only and ten whole-parenchyma phantoms were obtained, and one ellipsoidal phantom for comparison. To measure PVE, we placed the phantoms in a torso phantom and filled them with a specified activity concentration. The phantoms’ RCs were determined from fully quantitative SPECT/CT acquisitions at three different target-to-background ratios (TBRs). Additionally, the surface area-to-volume (SA:V) ratio was determined for all phantoms and correlated with RCs. RESULTS: For SPECT reconstructions with 36 iterations, average RC ± one standard deviation at a 10-to-1 TBR was 76.3 ± 1.5% and 48.4 ± 8.3% for whole-parenchyma and cortex-only phantoms, respectively. The RC for the ellipsoidal phantom was 85.4%. The RC for whole-parenchyma was significantly higher than for cortex-only phantoms (p < 0.01). The RC variance was significantly higher for cortex-only phantoms (p < 0.01). A highly significant correlation of the SA:V ratio and RC was found for all phantoms. (R(2) of linear regression was between 0.96 and 0.98.) CONCLUSION: Changes in the specific shape of the kidneys cause large changes in PVE magnitude. Therefore, RCs derived from more simple phantoms are most likely insufficient to correct the PVE in patient images. Furthermore, one should account for the fact that intra-renal activity distribution significantly influences the extent of PVE. Additionally, we found that the SA:V ratio excellently models kidney RCs; potentially, this approach could also be applied to other geometries and represents an alternative to full imaging process simulations to determine the extent of PVE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89213622022-03-25 The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study Grings, Andreas Jobic, Camille Kuwert, Torsten Ritt, Philipp EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can cause an over- or underestimation of tissue activity concentration due to limitations in spatial resolution compared to the structures under study. This is commonly referred to as partial volume effect (PVE). Ideally, the PVE should be controlled for and corrected. One such correction method involves determining recovery coefficients (RC) from phantom measurements. In the literature, several studies applying simplified geometries are available. In this study, we aimed to determine kidney PVE for realistic kidney geometries. Furthermore, we proposed a new surrogate metric for predicting the extent of PVE in kidneys. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on patients’ CT data, we manufactured fillable phantoms using a 3D-printer. Nine cortex-only and ten whole-parenchyma phantoms were obtained, and one ellipsoidal phantom for comparison. To measure PVE, we placed the phantoms in a torso phantom and filled them with a specified activity concentration. The phantoms’ RCs were determined from fully quantitative SPECT/CT acquisitions at three different target-to-background ratios (TBRs). Additionally, the surface area-to-volume (SA:V) ratio was determined for all phantoms and correlated with RCs. RESULTS: For SPECT reconstructions with 36 iterations, average RC ± one standard deviation at a 10-to-1 TBR was 76.3 ± 1.5% and 48.4 ± 8.3% for whole-parenchyma and cortex-only phantoms, respectively. The RC for the ellipsoidal phantom was 85.4%. The RC for whole-parenchyma was significantly higher than for cortex-only phantoms (p < 0.01). The RC variance was significantly higher for cortex-only phantoms (p < 0.01). A highly significant correlation of the SA:V ratio and RC was found for all phantoms. (R(2) of linear regression was between 0.96 and 0.98.) CONCLUSION: Changes in the specific shape of the kidneys cause large changes in PVE magnitude. Therefore, RCs derived from more simple phantoms are most likely insufficient to correct the PVE in patient images. Furthermore, one should account for the fact that intra-renal activity distribution significantly influences the extent of PVE. Additionally, we found that the SA:V ratio excellently models kidney RCs; potentially, this approach could also be applied to other geometries and represents an alternative to full imaging process simulations to determine the extent of PVE. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8921362/ /pubmed/35286500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00446-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Grings, Andreas
Jobic, Camille
Kuwert, Torsten
Ritt, Philipp
The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title_full The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title_fullStr The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title_short The magnitude of the partial volume effect in SPECT imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
title_sort magnitude of the partial volume effect in spect imaging of the kidneys: a phantom study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00446-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gringsandreas themagnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT jobiccamille themagnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT kuwerttorsten themagnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT rittphilipp themagnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT gringsandreas magnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT jobiccamille magnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT kuwerttorsten magnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy
AT rittphilipp magnitudeofthepartialvolumeeffectinspectimagingofthekidneysaphantomstudy