Cargando…
Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Normalization and batch correction are critical steps in processing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, which remove technical effects and systematic biases to unmask biological signals of interest. Although a number of computational methods have been developed, there is no guidance for cho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35048125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab565 |
_version_ | 1784669361975328768 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Shih-Kai Zhao, Shilin Shyr, Yu Liu, Qi |
author_facet | Chu, Shih-Kai Zhao, Shilin Shyr, Yu Liu, Qi |
author_sort | Chu, Shih-Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Normalization and batch correction are critical steps in processing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, which remove technical effects and systematic biases to unmask biological signals of interest. Although a number of computational methods have been developed, there is no guidance for choosing appropriate procedures in different scenarios. In this study, we assessed the performance of 28 scRNA-seq noise reduction procedures in 55 scenarios using simulated and real datasets. The scenarios accounted for multiple biological and technical factors that greatly affect the denoising performance, including relative magnitude of batch effects, the extent of cell population imbalance, the complexity of cell group structures, the proportion and the similarity of nonoverlapping cell populations, dropout rates and variable library sizes. We used multiple quantitative metrics and visualization of low-dimensional cell embeddings to evaluate the performance on batch mixing while preserving the original cell group and gene structures. Based on our results, we specified technical or biological factors affecting the performance of each method and recommended proper methods in different scenarios. In addition, we highlighted one challenging scenario where most methods failed and resulted in overcorrection. Our studies not only provided a comprehensive guideline for selecting suitable noise reduction procedures but also pointed out unsolved issues in the field, especially the urgent need of developing metrics for assessing batch correction on imperceptible cell-type mixing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89216322022-03-15 Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data Chu, Shih-Kai Zhao, Shilin Shyr, Yu Liu, Qi Brief Bioinform Review Normalization and batch correction are critical steps in processing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, which remove technical effects and systematic biases to unmask biological signals of interest. Although a number of computational methods have been developed, there is no guidance for choosing appropriate procedures in different scenarios. In this study, we assessed the performance of 28 scRNA-seq noise reduction procedures in 55 scenarios using simulated and real datasets. The scenarios accounted for multiple biological and technical factors that greatly affect the denoising performance, including relative magnitude of batch effects, the extent of cell population imbalance, the complexity of cell group structures, the proportion and the similarity of nonoverlapping cell populations, dropout rates and variable library sizes. We used multiple quantitative metrics and visualization of low-dimensional cell embeddings to evaluate the performance on batch mixing while preserving the original cell group and gene structures. Based on our results, we specified technical or biological factors affecting the performance of each method and recommended proper methods in different scenarios. In addition, we highlighted one challenging scenario where most methods failed and resulted in overcorrection. Our studies not only provided a comprehensive guideline for selecting suitable noise reduction procedures but also pointed out unsolved issues in the field, especially the urgent need of developing metrics for assessing batch correction on imperceptible cell-type mixing. Oxford University Press 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8921632/ /pubmed/35048125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab565 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Chu, Shih-Kai Zhao, Shilin Shyr, Yu Liu, Qi Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title | Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title_full | Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title_short | Comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data |
title_sort | comprehensive evaluation of noise reduction methods for single-cell rna sequencing data |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35048125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chushihkai comprehensiveevaluationofnoisereductionmethodsforsinglecellrnasequencingdata AT zhaoshilin comprehensiveevaluationofnoisereductionmethodsforsinglecellrnasequencingdata AT shyryu comprehensiveevaluationofnoisereductionmethodsforsinglecellrnasequencingdata AT liuqi comprehensiveevaluationofnoisereductionmethodsforsinglecellrnasequencingdata |