Cargando…

Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis

PURPOSE: High recurrence rate of chalaziosis and serious side effects of repeated surgical excision may help increase awareness of recurrent and refractory chalaziosis as a serious disorder affecting many aspects of life. This present study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intense...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yirui, Huang, Xiaodan, Lin, Lin, Di, Mengshu, Chen, Ruida, Dong, Jilian, Jin, Xiuming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35299836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.839908
_version_ 1784669390080311296
author Zhu, Yirui
Huang, Xiaodan
Lin, Lin
Di, Mengshu
Chen, Ruida
Dong, Jilian
Jin, Xiuming
author_facet Zhu, Yirui
Huang, Xiaodan
Lin, Lin
Di, Mengshu
Chen, Ruida
Dong, Jilian
Jin, Xiuming
author_sort Zhu, Yirui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: High recurrence rate of chalaziosis and serious side effects of repeated surgical excision may help increase awareness of recurrent and refractory chalaziosis as a serious disorder affecting many aspects of life. This present study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intense pulse light (IPL) therapy and meibomian gland expression (MGX) in cases of recurrent chalaziosis after excision surgery. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive recurrent chalaziosis cases (35 patients) treated with IPL-MGX were enrolled. All patients initially underwent excision with curettage. One week after lesion excision, IPL-MGX were performed at least 3 times. Another set of age- and sex-matched consecutive cases of recurrent chalaziosis, who received excision with curettage, but went without IPL-MGX treatment, were collected to calculate recurrence rate. Treatment efficacy and safety were measured before IPL-MGX treatment and 1 month after the final treatment. RESULTS: The majority of patients received 4 sessions of IPL-MGX therapy (20 patients; 57.1%) or 3 sessions of IPL-MGX therapy (10 patients; 28.6%), resulting in a lower recurrence rate of 11.4% compared to that of recurrent chalaziosis without IPL-MGX cases (45.6%, P < 0.001). The NIBUT was significantly prolonged from 3.9 ± 1.8 to 5.1 ± 1.7 s at 4 weeks after the final treatment (P = 0.001). Similarly, mean TMH score improved and was statistically significant when compared with baseline (0.17 ± 0.07 vs. 0.21± 0.09; P = 0.008). Furthermore, meibum quality and expressibility scores significantly improved at 4 weeks following the final treatment (both P < 0.001). Other variables, such as intraocular pressure and visual acuity, remained unaffected following treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of IPL treatment and MGX offers a low risk and effective option in decreasing the recurrence rate of recurrent chalaziosis by improving meibomian gland function. IPL-MGX may be considered for first-line treatment in recurrent or refractory cases post excision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89217642022-03-16 Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis Zhu, Yirui Huang, Xiaodan Lin, Lin Di, Mengshu Chen, Ruida Dong, Jilian Jin, Xiuming Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: High recurrence rate of chalaziosis and serious side effects of repeated surgical excision may help increase awareness of recurrent and refractory chalaziosis as a serious disorder affecting many aspects of life. This present study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intense pulse light (IPL) therapy and meibomian gland expression (MGX) in cases of recurrent chalaziosis after excision surgery. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive recurrent chalaziosis cases (35 patients) treated with IPL-MGX were enrolled. All patients initially underwent excision with curettage. One week after lesion excision, IPL-MGX were performed at least 3 times. Another set of age- and sex-matched consecutive cases of recurrent chalaziosis, who received excision with curettage, but went without IPL-MGX treatment, were collected to calculate recurrence rate. Treatment efficacy and safety were measured before IPL-MGX treatment and 1 month after the final treatment. RESULTS: The majority of patients received 4 sessions of IPL-MGX therapy (20 patients; 57.1%) or 3 sessions of IPL-MGX therapy (10 patients; 28.6%), resulting in a lower recurrence rate of 11.4% compared to that of recurrent chalaziosis without IPL-MGX cases (45.6%, P < 0.001). The NIBUT was significantly prolonged from 3.9 ± 1.8 to 5.1 ± 1.7 s at 4 weeks after the final treatment (P = 0.001). Similarly, mean TMH score improved and was statistically significant when compared with baseline (0.17 ± 0.07 vs. 0.21± 0.09; P = 0.008). Furthermore, meibum quality and expressibility scores significantly improved at 4 weeks following the final treatment (both P < 0.001). Other variables, such as intraocular pressure and visual acuity, remained unaffected following treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of IPL treatment and MGX offers a low risk and effective option in decreasing the recurrence rate of recurrent chalaziosis by improving meibomian gland function. IPL-MGX may be considered for first-line treatment in recurrent or refractory cases post excision. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8921764/ /pubmed/35299836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.839908 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Huang, Lin, Di, Chen, Dong and Jin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zhu, Yirui
Huang, Xiaodan
Lin, Lin
Di, Mengshu
Chen, Ruida
Dong, Jilian
Jin, Xiuming
Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title_full Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title_short Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalaziosis
title_sort efficacy of intense pulsed light in the treatment of recurrent chalaziosis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35299836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.839908
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyirui efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT huangxiaodan efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT linlin efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT dimengshu efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT chenruida efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT dongjilian efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis
AT jinxiuming efficacyofintensepulsedlightinthetreatmentofrecurrentchalaziosis