Cargando…

Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atkins, Kaitlyn, Kennedy, Caitlin E, Yeh, Ping Teresa, Narasimhan, Manjulaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122
_version_ 1784669405999792128
author Atkins, Kaitlyn
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
author_facet Atkins, Kaitlyn
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
author_sort Atkins, Kaitlyn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with prescription-only ECPs and measuring ECP uptake, correct use, unintended pregnancy, abortion, sexual practices/behaviour, self-efficacy and side-effects/harms. We also reviewed studies assessing values/preferences and costs of OTC ECPs. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, CINAL, LILACS, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Fertility Regulation and International Consortium for Emergency Contraception through 2 December 2020. RISK OF BIAS: For trials, we used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias; for other studies, we used the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarised data in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile tables, reporting findings by study design and outcome. We qualitatively synthesised values/preferences and cost data. RESULTS: We included 19 studies evaluating effectiveness of OTC ECP, 56 on values/preferences and 3 on costs. All studies except one were from high-income and middle-income settings. Broadly, there were no differences in overall ECP use, pregnancy or sexual behaviour, but an increase in timely ECP use, when comparing OTC or pharmacy ECP to prescription-only ECP groups. Studies showed similar/lower abortion rates in areas with pharmacy availability of ECPs. Users and providers generally supported OTC ECPs; decisions for use were influenced by privacy/confidentiality, convenience, and cost. Three modelling studies found pharmacy-access ECPs would lower health sector costs. CONCLUSION: OTC ECPs are feasible and acceptable. They may increase access to and timely use of effective contraception. Existing evidence suggests OTC ECPs do not substantively change reproductive health outcomes. Future studies should examine OTC ECP’s impacts on user costs, among key subgroups and in low-resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8921871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89218712022-03-30 Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review Atkins, Kaitlyn Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Narasimhan, Manjulaa BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with prescription-only ECPs and measuring ECP uptake, correct use, unintended pregnancy, abortion, sexual practices/behaviour, self-efficacy and side-effects/harms. We also reviewed studies assessing values/preferences and costs of OTC ECPs. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, CINAL, LILACS, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Fertility Regulation and International Consortium for Emergency Contraception through 2 December 2020. RISK OF BIAS: For trials, we used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias; for other studies, we used the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarised data in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile tables, reporting findings by study design and outcome. We qualitatively synthesised values/preferences and cost data. RESULTS: We included 19 studies evaluating effectiveness of OTC ECP, 56 on values/preferences and 3 on costs. All studies except one were from high-income and middle-income settings. Broadly, there were no differences in overall ECP use, pregnancy or sexual behaviour, but an increase in timely ECP use, when comparing OTC or pharmacy ECP to prescription-only ECP groups. Studies showed similar/lower abortion rates in areas with pharmacy availability of ECPs. Users and providers generally supported OTC ECPs; decisions for use were influenced by privacy/confidentiality, convenience, and cost. Three modelling studies found pharmacy-access ECPs would lower health sector costs. CONCLUSION: OTC ECPs are feasible and acceptable. They may increase access to and timely use of effective contraception. Existing evidence suggests OTC ECPs do not substantively change reproductive health outcomes. Future studies should examine OTC ECP’s impacts on user costs, among key subgroups and in low-resource settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8921871/ /pubmed/35288384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Atkins, Kaitlyn
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title_full Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title_fullStr Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title_short Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
title_sort over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122
work_keys_str_mv AT atkinskaitlyn overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview
AT kennedycaitline overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview
AT yehpingteresa overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview
AT narasimhanmanjulaa overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview