Cargando…
Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122 |
_version_ | 1784669405999792128 |
---|---|
author | Atkins, Kaitlyn Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Narasimhan, Manjulaa |
author_facet | Atkins, Kaitlyn Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Narasimhan, Manjulaa |
author_sort | Atkins, Kaitlyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with prescription-only ECPs and measuring ECP uptake, correct use, unintended pregnancy, abortion, sexual practices/behaviour, self-efficacy and side-effects/harms. We also reviewed studies assessing values/preferences and costs of OTC ECPs. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, CINAL, LILACS, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Fertility Regulation and International Consortium for Emergency Contraception through 2 December 2020. RISK OF BIAS: For trials, we used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias; for other studies, we used the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarised data in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile tables, reporting findings by study design and outcome. We qualitatively synthesised values/preferences and cost data. RESULTS: We included 19 studies evaluating effectiveness of OTC ECP, 56 on values/preferences and 3 on costs. All studies except one were from high-income and middle-income settings. Broadly, there were no differences in overall ECP use, pregnancy or sexual behaviour, but an increase in timely ECP use, when comparing OTC or pharmacy ECP to prescription-only ECP groups. Studies showed similar/lower abortion rates in areas with pharmacy availability of ECPs. Users and providers generally supported OTC ECPs; decisions for use were influenced by privacy/confidentiality, convenience, and cost. Three modelling studies found pharmacy-access ECPs would lower health sector costs. CONCLUSION: OTC ECPs are feasible and acceptable. They may increase access to and timely use of effective contraception. Existing evidence suggests OTC ECPs do not substantively change reproductive health outcomes. Future studies should examine OTC ECP’s impacts on user costs, among key subgroups and in low-resource settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89218712022-03-30 Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review Atkins, Kaitlyn Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Narasimhan, Manjulaa BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence around over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) to expand the evidence base on self-care interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO# CRD42021231625). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included publications comparing OTC or pharmacy-access ECP with prescription-only ECPs and measuring ECP uptake, correct use, unintended pregnancy, abortion, sexual practices/behaviour, self-efficacy and side-effects/harms. We also reviewed studies assessing values/preferences and costs of OTC ECPs. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, CINAL, LILACS, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Fertility Regulation and International Consortium for Emergency Contraception through 2 December 2020. RISK OF BIAS: For trials, we used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias; for other studies, we used the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarised data in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile tables, reporting findings by study design and outcome. We qualitatively synthesised values/preferences and cost data. RESULTS: We included 19 studies evaluating effectiveness of OTC ECP, 56 on values/preferences and 3 on costs. All studies except one were from high-income and middle-income settings. Broadly, there were no differences in overall ECP use, pregnancy or sexual behaviour, but an increase in timely ECP use, when comparing OTC or pharmacy ECP to prescription-only ECP groups. Studies showed similar/lower abortion rates in areas with pharmacy availability of ECPs. Users and providers generally supported OTC ECPs; decisions for use were influenced by privacy/confidentiality, convenience, and cost. Three modelling studies found pharmacy-access ECPs would lower health sector costs. CONCLUSION: OTC ECPs are feasible and acceptable. They may increase access to and timely use of effective contraception. Existing evidence suggests OTC ECPs do not substantively change reproductive health outcomes. Future studies should examine OTC ECP’s impacts on user costs, among key subgroups and in low-resource settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8921871/ /pubmed/35288384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Atkins, Kaitlyn Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Narasimhan, Manjulaa Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title | Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title_full | Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title_short | Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
title_sort | over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atkinskaitlyn overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview AT kennedycaitline overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview AT yehpingteresa overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview AT narasimhanmanjulaa overthecounterprovisionofemergencycontraceptivepillsasystematicreview |