Cargando…
Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) often occurs subsequently to a primary cancer arising from a different site. However, little is known regarding the survival experience of EC as a second primary (ECSP) malignancy, specifically in relation to the original primary site and prior treatment. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35098701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4554 |
_version_ | 1784669412056367104 |
---|---|
author | Medina, Heidy N. Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. Penedo, Frank J. Pinheiro, Paulo S. |
author_facet | Medina, Heidy N. Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. Penedo, Frank J. Pinheiro, Paulo S. |
author_sort | Medina, Heidy N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) often occurs subsequently to a primary cancer arising from a different site. However, little is known regarding the survival experience of EC as a second primary (ECSP) malignancy, specifically in relation to the original primary site and prior treatment. METHODS: Using Florida's cancer registry, all EC cases (first, second, or higher‐order) diagnosed from 2005–2016 were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox Regression were used in a cause‐specific survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2879 clinically independent ECSPs and 42,714 first primary ECs were analyzed. The most common first primary sites for ECSPs were breast cancer (BC) (n = 1422) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 359). Five‐year cause‐specific survival was 84.0% (95% CI: 83.6–84.3) for first primary ECs and 81.8% (95% CI: 80.0–83.4) for ECSPs. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, histology, and stage at diagnosis, ECSPs had a lower risk of EC mortality than first primary ECs (hazard ratios [HR] 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). ECSPs with a first primary CRC had a higher risk of EC‐specific death (HR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04–2.06) compared to ECSPs that followed BC in multivariable analysis. Finally, women who had chemotherapy for ECSP and preceding BC did not have a higher risk of death (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.49–1.31) compared to those who only received chemotherapy for first primary EC. CONCLUSIONS: ECSPs present a complex clinical profile. ECSP survival is superior to that of first primary EC. However, ECSPs following CRC may constitute a population of interest for their worse prognosis. Chemotherapy for a previous BC does not seem to impact the effectiveness of chemotherapy for ECs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8921898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89218982022-03-21 Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy Medina, Heidy N. Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. Penedo, Frank J. Pinheiro, Paulo S. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) often occurs subsequently to a primary cancer arising from a different site. However, little is known regarding the survival experience of EC as a second primary (ECSP) malignancy, specifically in relation to the original primary site and prior treatment. METHODS: Using Florida's cancer registry, all EC cases (first, second, or higher‐order) diagnosed from 2005–2016 were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox Regression were used in a cause‐specific survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2879 clinically independent ECSPs and 42,714 first primary ECs were analyzed. The most common first primary sites for ECSPs were breast cancer (BC) (n = 1422) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 359). Five‐year cause‐specific survival was 84.0% (95% CI: 83.6–84.3) for first primary ECs and 81.8% (95% CI: 80.0–83.4) for ECSPs. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, histology, and stage at diagnosis, ECSPs had a lower risk of EC mortality than first primary ECs (hazard ratios [HR] 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). ECSPs with a first primary CRC had a higher risk of EC‐specific death (HR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04–2.06) compared to ECSPs that followed BC in multivariable analysis. Finally, women who had chemotherapy for ECSP and preceding BC did not have a higher risk of death (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.49–1.31) compared to those who only received chemotherapy for first primary EC. CONCLUSIONS: ECSPs present a complex clinical profile. ECSP survival is superior to that of first primary EC. However, ECSPs following CRC may constitute a population of interest for their worse prognosis. Chemotherapy for a previous BC does not seem to impact the effectiveness of chemotherapy for ECs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8921898/ /pubmed/35098701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Medina, Heidy N. Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. Penedo, Frank J. Pinheiro, Paulo S. Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title | Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title_full | Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title_fullStr | Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title_short | Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
title_sort | survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35098701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT medinaheidyn survivalforendometrialcancerasasecondprimarymalignancy AT schlumbrechtmatthewp survivalforendometrialcancerasasecondprimarymalignancy AT penedofrankj survivalforendometrialcancerasasecondprimarymalignancy AT pinheiropaulos survivalforendometrialcancerasasecondprimarymalignancy |