Cargando…

Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly efficacious procedure used most commonly for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Despite the high value of incorporating FMT into practice, there remain concerns about its safety. To the best of our knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rapoport, Eliot A., Baig, Muhammad, Puli, Srinivas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35479587
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0695
_version_ 1784669490543329280
author Rapoport, Eliot A.
Baig, Muhammad
Puli, Srinivas R.
author_facet Rapoport, Eliot A.
Baig, Muhammad
Puli, Srinivas R.
author_sort Rapoport, Eliot A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly efficacious procedure used most commonly for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Despite the high value of incorporating FMT into practice, there remain concerns about its safety. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been an updated meta-analysis reporting pooled rates of adverse events in FMT for CDI. METHODS: A search for studies of FMT in patients with CDI was performed with the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to FMT evaluated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included SAEs unrelated to FMT and minor adverse events associated with FMT. A pooled analysis was then performed. RESULTS: Initial search identified 378 reference articles. Data were extracted from the 61 of these studies that met the inclusion criteria, comprising 5099 patients. Pooled analysis showed that SAEs related to FMT developed in less than 1% of patients. The pooled rate of SAEs not related to FMT was higher at 2.9%. The pooled rate of minor adverse events also showed infrequent self-limited gastrointestinal and systemic discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports FMT as a safe option for treating recurrent CDI. Future randomized trials are needed to improve our current understanding of FMT safety and further examine the improvements in the quality of life of patients treated with FMT compared to standard therapy of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8922263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89222632022-04-26 Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rapoport, Eliot A. Baig, Muhammad Puli, Srinivas R. Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly efficacious procedure used most commonly for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Despite the high value of incorporating FMT into practice, there remain concerns about its safety. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been an updated meta-analysis reporting pooled rates of adverse events in FMT for CDI. METHODS: A search for studies of FMT in patients with CDI was performed with the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to FMT evaluated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included SAEs unrelated to FMT and minor adverse events associated with FMT. A pooled analysis was then performed. RESULTS: Initial search identified 378 reference articles. Data were extracted from the 61 of these studies that met the inclusion criteria, comprising 5099 patients. Pooled analysis showed that SAEs related to FMT developed in less than 1% of patients. The pooled rate of SAEs not related to FMT was higher at 2.9%. The pooled rate of minor adverse events also showed infrequent self-limited gastrointestinal and systemic discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports FMT as a safe option for treating recurrent CDI. Future randomized trials are needed to improve our current understanding of FMT safety and further examine the improvements in the quality of life of patients treated with FMT compared to standard therapy of antibiotics. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2022 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8922263/ /pubmed/35479587 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0695 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rapoport, Eliot A.
Baig, Muhammad
Puli, Srinivas R.
Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort adverse events in fecal microbiota transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35479587
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0695
work_keys_str_mv AT rapoporteliota adverseeventsinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baigmuhammad adverseeventsinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pulisrinivasr adverseeventsinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis