Cargando…
Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine
Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124 |
_version_ | 1784669515583324160 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Van der Stede, Yves Alvarez, Julio |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Van der Stede, Yves Alvarez, Julio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR B. hyodysenteriae can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 3 (Categories A, B and C; 1–10%, 10–33% and 10–33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 4 and 5 (Categories D and E, 50–90% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The main animal species to be listed for AMR B. hyodysenteriae according to Article 8 criteria are pigs and some species of birds, such as chickens and ducks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8922405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89224052022-03-21 Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Van der Stede, Yves Alvarez, Julio EFSA J Scientific Opinion Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR B. hyodysenteriae can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 3 (Categories A, B and C; 1–10%, 10–33% and 10–33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 4 and 5 (Categories D and E, 50–90% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The main animal species to be listed for AMR B. hyodysenteriae according to Article 8 criteria are pigs and some species of birds, such as chickens and ducks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8922405/ /pubmed/35317125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Van der Stede, Yves Alvarez, Julio Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title_full | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title_fullStr | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title_short | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
title_sort | assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the animal health law (regulation (eu) no 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT calistripaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT canalielisabetta assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT drewejulianashley assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT garinbastujibruno assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT gortazarchristian assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT herskinmette assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT michelvirginie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT padalinobarbara assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT pasqualipaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT robertshelenclare assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT spoolderhans assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT stahlkarl assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT velardeantonio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT viltroparvo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT wincklerchristoph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT baldinellifrancesca assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT brogliaalessandro assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT kohnlelisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT vanderstedeyves assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT alvarezjulio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine |