Cargando…
Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567 |
_version_ | 1784669524423868416 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Fan Li, Xin Wang, Qi Luo, Yingjuan Wang, Xin Huang, Xiuhua Zhang, Jiajia Peng, Jieru Wang, Qin Fan, Li Li, Wen Huo, Junrong Liu, Tianjiao Li, Yalan Lin, Yonghong Yang, Xiao |
author_facet | Lai, Fan Li, Xin Wang, Qi Luo, Yingjuan Wang, Xin Huang, Xiuhua Zhang, Jiajia Peng, Jieru Wang, Qin Fan, Li Li, Wen Huo, Junrong Liu, Tianjiao Li, Yalan Lin, Yonghong Yang, Xiao |
author_sort | Lai, Fan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have shown that NCIT readings fluctuate widely depending on ambient temperatures and the body surface site screened. The aim of this study was to establish cut-off points for normal temperatures of different body sites (neck, forehead, temples, and wrist) and investigate the accuracy of NCITs at various ambient temperatures to improve the standardization and accuracy of fever screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective investigation was conducted among 904 participants in the outpatient and emergency departments of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Body temperature was measured using NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of body temperature detection at the four body surface sites. Data on participant characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Among the four surface sites, the neck temperature detection group had the highest accuracy. When the neck temperature was 37.35°C as the optimum fever diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity was 0.866. The optimum fever diagnostic thresholds for forehead, temporal, and wrist temperature were 36.65°C, 36.65°C, and 36.75°C, respectively. Moreover, triple neck temperature detection had the highest sensitivity, up to 0.998, whereas the sensitivity of triple wrist temperature detections was 0.949. Notably, the accuracy of NCITs significantly reduced when the temperature was lower than 18°C. CONCLUSION: Neck temperature had the highest accuracy among the four NCIT temperature measurement sites, with an optimum fever diagnostic threshold of 37.35°C. Considering the findings reported in our study, we recommend triple neck temperature detection with NCITs as the fever screening standard for COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8922455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89224552022-03-16 Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 Lai, Fan Li, Xin Wang, Qi Luo, Yingjuan Wang, Xin Huang, Xiuhua Zhang, Jiajia Peng, Jieru Wang, Qin Fan, Li Li, Wen Huo, Junrong Liu, Tianjiao Li, Yalan Lin, Yonghong Yang, Xiao Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have shown that NCIT readings fluctuate widely depending on ambient temperatures and the body surface site screened. The aim of this study was to establish cut-off points for normal temperatures of different body sites (neck, forehead, temples, and wrist) and investigate the accuracy of NCITs at various ambient temperatures to improve the standardization and accuracy of fever screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective investigation was conducted among 904 participants in the outpatient and emergency departments of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Body temperature was measured using NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of body temperature detection at the four body surface sites. Data on participant characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Among the four surface sites, the neck temperature detection group had the highest accuracy. When the neck temperature was 37.35°C as the optimum fever diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity was 0.866. The optimum fever diagnostic thresholds for forehead, temporal, and wrist temperature were 36.65°C, 36.65°C, and 36.75°C, respectively. Moreover, triple neck temperature detection had the highest sensitivity, up to 0.998, whereas the sensitivity of triple wrist temperature detections was 0.949. Notably, the accuracy of NCITs significantly reduced when the temperature was lower than 18°C. CONCLUSION: Neck temperature had the highest accuracy among the four NCIT temperature measurement sites, with an optimum fever diagnostic threshold of 37.35°C. Considering the findings reported in our study, we recommend triple neck temperature detection with NCITs as the fever screening standard for COVID-19. Dove 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8922455/ /pubmed/35300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567 Text en © 2022 Lai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lai, Fan Li, Xin Wang, Qi Luo, Yingjuan Wang, Xin Huang, Xiuhua Zhang, Jiajia Peng, Jieru Wang, Qin Fan, Li Li, Wen Huo, Junrong Liu, Tianjiao Li, Yalan Lin, Yonghong Yang, Xiao Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title | Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title_full | Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title_short | Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 |
title_sort | reliability of non-contact infrared thermometers for fever screening under covid-19 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laifan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT lixin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT wangqi reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT luoyingjuan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT wangxin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT huangxiuhua reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT zhangjiajia reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT pengjieru reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT wangqin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT fanli reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT liwen reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT huojunrong reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT liutianjiao reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT liyalan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT linyonghong reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 AT yangxiao reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19 |