Cargando…

Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19

PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Fan, Li, Xin, Wang, Qi, Luo, Yingjuan, Wang, Xin, Huang, Xiuhua, Zhang, Jiajia, Peng, Jieru, Wang, Qin, Fan, Li, Li, Wen, Huo, Junrong, Liu, Tianjiao, Li, Yalan, Lin, Yonghong, Yang, Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567
_version_ 1784669524423868416
author Lai, Fan
Li, Xin
Wang, Qi
Luo, Yingjuan
Wang, Xin
Huang, Xiuhua
Zhang, Jiajia
Peng, Jieru
Wang, Qin
Fan, Li
Li, Wen
Huo, Junrong
Liu, Tianjiao
Li, Yalan
Lin, Yonghong
Yang, Xiao
author_facet Lai, Fan
Li, Xin
Wang, Qi
Luo, Yingjuan
Wang, Xin
Huang, Xiuhua
Zhang, Jiajia
Peng, Jieru
Wang, Qin
Fan, Li
Li, Wen
Huo, Junrong
Liu, Tianjiao
Li, Yalan
Lin, Yonghong
Yang, Xiao
author_sort Lai, Fan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have shown that NCIT readings fluctuate widely depending on ambient temperatures and the body surface site screened. The aim of this study was to establish cut-off points for normal temperatures of different body sites (neck, forehead, temples, and wrist) and investigate the accuracy of NCITs at various ambient temperatures to improve the standardization and accuracy of fever screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective investigation was conducted among 904 participants in the outpatient and emergency departments of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Body temperature was measured using NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of body temperature detection at the four body surface sites. Data on participant characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Among the four surface sites, the neck temperature detection group had the highest accuracy. When the neck temperature was 37.35°C as the optimum fever diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity was 0.866. The optimum fever diagnostic thresholds for forehead, temporal, and wrist temperature were 36.65°C, 36.65°C, and 36.75°C, respectively. Moreover, triple neck temperature detection had the highest sensitivity, up to 0.998, whereas the sensitivity of triple wrist temperature detections was 0.949. Notably, the accuracy of NCITs significantly reduced when the temperature was lower than 18°C. CONCLUSION: Neck temperature had the highest accuracy among the four NCIT temperature measurement sites, with an optimum fever diagnostic threshold of 37.35°C. Considering the findings reported in our study, we recommend triple neck temperature detection with NCITs as the fever screening standard for COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8922455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89224552022-03-16 Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19 Lai, Fan Li, Xin Wang, Qi Luo, Yingjuan Wang, Xin Huang, Xiuhua Zhang, Jiajia Peng, Jieru Wang, Qin Fan, Li Li, Wen Huo, Junrong Liu, Tianjiao Li, Yalan Lin, Yonghong Yang, Xiao Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research PURPOSE: Fever is one of the most typical clinical symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are commonly used to screen for fever. However, there is a lack of authoritative data to define a “fever” when an NCIT is used and previous studies have shown that NCIT readings fluctuate widely depending on ambient temperatures and the body surface site screened. The aim of this study was to establish cut-off points for normal temperatures of different body sites (neck, forehead, temples, and wrist) and investigate the accuracy of NCITs at various ambient temperatures to improve the standardization and accuracy of fever screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective investigation was conducted among 904 participants in the outpatient and emergency departments of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Body temperature was measured using NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of body temperature detection at the four body surface sites. Data on participant characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Among the four surface sites, the neck temperature detection group had the highest accuracy. When the neck temperature was 37.35°C as the optimum fever diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity was 0.866. The optimum fever diagnostic thresholds for forehead, temporal, and wrist temperature were 36.65°C, 36.65°C, and 36.75°C, respectively. Moreover, triple neck temperature detection had the highest sensitivity, up to 0.998, whereas the sensitivity of triple wrist temperature detections was 0.949. Notably, the accuracy of NCITs significantly reduced when the temperature was lower than 18°C. CONCLUSION: Neck temperature had the highest accuracy among the four NCIT temperature measurement sites, with an optimum fever diagnostic threshold of 37.35°C. Considering the findings reported in our study, we recommend triple neck temperature detection with NCITs as the fever screening standard for COVID-19. Dove 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8922455/ /pubmed/35300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567 Text en © 2022 Lai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lai, Fan
Li, Xin
Wang, Qi
Luo, Yingjuan
Wang, Xin
Huang, Xiuhua
Zhang, Jiajia
Peng, Jieru
Wang, Qin
Fan, Li
Li, Wen
Huo, Junrong
Liu, Tianjiao
Li, Yalan
Lin, Yonghong
Yang, Xiao
Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title_full Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title_fullStr Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title_short Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
title_sort reliability of non-contact infrared thermometers for fever screening under covid-19
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S357567
work_keys_str_mv AT laifan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT lixin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT wangqi reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT luoyingjuan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT wangxin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT huangxiuhua reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT zhangjiajia reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT pengjieru reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT wangqin reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT fanli reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT liwen reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT huojunrong reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT liutianjiao reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT liyalan reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT linyonghong reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19
AT yangxiao reliabilityofnoncontactinfraredthermometersforfeverscreeningundercovid19