Cargando…
Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311 |
_version_ | 1784669541935087616 |
---|---|
author | Spierings, Julia Nienhuis, Hilde van Lieshout, Eva van Laar, Jacob M Pieterse, Arwen H |
author_facet | Spierings, Julia Nienhuis, Hilde van Lieshout, Eva van Laar, Jacob M Pieterse, Arwen H |
author_sort | Spierings, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of patients with dcSSc. The questionnaire was based on a systematic literature search regarding benefits and harms of four main treatment options in dcSSc: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide pulses and stem cell transplantation. Patients were asked to identify information that is essential for making a treatment decision. After the third round, a live, online discussion was held in order to reach consensus on these items and to discuss the content and design of the leaflet. Consensus was defined as ⩾75% agreement among panel members. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients invited, 78% (n = 28) participated in one or more rounds, 67% (n = 24) completed the first, 69% (n = 25) the second and 75% (n = 27) the third round. In the last round, median age of participants was 51 years (interquartile range, 18) and median disease duration 4 years (interquartile range, 5); 52% were female. Patients had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (67%), methotrexate (44%), cyclophosphamide (41%), autologous stem cell transplantation (26%), rituximab (4%) or were treatment-naïve (7%). Eight patients joined the live panel discussion. The panel reached consensus on seven benefits (prolonged progression-free survival, improved quality of life, improved daily functioning, improved pulmonary function, improved skin thickness, improved mobility and reduced fatigue) and four harms (treatment-related mortality, infections, cardiac damage, increased risk of cancer) as essential information for decision making. Also a design of a leaflet was made. CONCLUSION: This study identified information about treatment options in dcSSc that should be addressed with patients. Our results can be used to develop effective patient information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8922679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89226792022-04-04 Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study Spierings, Julia Nienhuis, Hilde van Lieshout, Eva van Laar, Jacob M Pieterse, Arwen H J Scleroderma Relat Disord Original Manuscript OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of patients with dcSSc. The questionnaire was based on a systematic literature search regarding benefits and harms of four main treatment options in dcSSc: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide pulses and stem cell transplantation. Patients were asked to identify information that is essential for making a treatment decision. After the third round, a live, online discussion was held in order to reach consensus on these items and to discuss the content and design of the leaflet. Consensus was defined as ⩾75% agreement among panel members. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients invited, 78% (n = 28) participated in one or more rounds, 67% (n = 24) completed the first, 69% (n = 25) the second and 75% (n = 27) the third round. In the last round, median age of participants was 51 years (interquartile range, 18) and median disease duration 4 years (interquartile range, 5); 52% were female. Patients had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (67%), methotrexate (44%), cyclophosphamide (41%), autologous stem cell transplantation (26%), rituximab (4%) or were treatment-naïve (7%). Eight patients joined the live panel discussion. The panel reached consensus on seven benefits (prolonged progression-free survival, improved quality of life, improved daily functioning, improved pulmonary function, improved skin thickness, improved mobility and reduced fatigue) and four harms (treatment-related mortality, infections, cardiac damage, increased risk of cancer) as essential information for decision making. Also a design of a leaflet was made. CONCLUSION: This study identified information about treatment options in dcSSc that should be addressed with patients. Our results can be used to develop effective patient information. SAGE Publications 2021-09-08 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8922679/ /pubmed/35382449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Spierings, Julia Nienhuis, Hilde van Lieshout, Eva van Laar, Jacob M Pieterse, Arwen H Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title | Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title_full | Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title_fullStr | Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title_short | Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study |
title_sort | information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a delphi consensus study |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spieringsjulia informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy AT nienhuishilde informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy AT vanlieshouteva informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy AT vanlaarjacobm informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy AT pietersearwenh informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy |