Cargando…

Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spierings, Julia, Nienhuis, Hilde, van Lieshout, Eva, van Laar, Jacob M, Pieterse, Arwen H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311
_version_ 1784669541935087616
author Spierings, Julia
Nienhuis, Hilde
van Lieshout, Eva
van Laar, Jacob M
Pieterse, Arwen H
author_facet Spierings, Julia
Nienhuis, Hilde
van Lieshout, Eva
van Laar, Jacob M
Pieterse, Arwen H
author_sort Spierings, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of patients with dcSSc. The questionnaire was based on a systematic literature search regarding benefits and harms of four main treatment options in dcSSc: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide pulses and stem cell transplantation. Patients were asked to identify information that is essential for making a treatment decision. After the third round, a live, online discussion was held in order to reach consensus on these items and to discuss the content and design of the leaflet. Consensus was defined as ⩾75% agreement among panel members. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients invited, 78% (n = 28) participated in one or more rounds, 67% (n = 24) completed the first, 69% (n = 25) the second and 75% (n = 27) the third round. In the last round, median age of participants was 51 years (interquartile range, 18) and median disease duration 4 years (interquartile range, 5); 52% were female. Patients had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (67%), methotrexate (44%), cyclophosphamide (41%), autologous stem cell transplantation (26%), rituximab (4%) or were treatment-naïve (7%). Eight patients joined the live panel discussion. The panel reached consensus on seven benefits (prolonged progression-free survival, improved quality of life, improved daily functioning, improved pulmonary function, improved skin thickness, improved mobility and reduced fatigue) and four harms (treatment-related mortality, infections, cardiac damage, increased risk of cancer) as essential information for decision making. Also a design of a leaflet was made. CONCLUSION: This study identified information about treatment options in dcSSc that should be addressed with patients. Our results can be used to develop effective patient information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8922679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89226792022-04-04 Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study Spierings, Julia Nienhuis, Hilde van Lieshout, Eva van Laar, Jacob M Pieterse, Arwen H J Scleroderma Relat Disord Original Manuscript OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize aspects essential for decision making in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and to gain insight into information preferences of treatment options which could guide development of a leaflet for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of patients with dcSSc. The questionnaire was based on a systematic literature search regarding benefits and harms of four main treatment options in dcSSc: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide pulses and stem cell transplantation. Patients were asked to identify information that is essential for making a treatment decision. After the third round, a live, online discussion was held in order to reach consensus on these items and to discuss the content and design of the leaflet. Consensus was defined as ⩾75% agreement among panel members. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients invited, 78% (n = 28) participated in one or more rounds, 67% (n = 24) completed the first, 69% (n = 25) the second and 75% (n = 27) the third round. In the last round, median age of participants was 51 years (interquartile range, 18) and median disease duration 4 years (interquartile range, 5); 52% were female. Patients had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (67%), methotrexate (44%), cyclophosphamide (41%), autologous stem cell transplantation (26%), rituximab (4%) or were treatment-naïve (7%). Eight patients joined the live panel discussion. The panel reached consensus on seven benefits (prolonged progression-free survival, improved quality of life, improved daily functioning, improved pulmonary function, improved skin thickness, improved mobility and reduced fatigue) and four harms (treatment-related mortality, infections, cardiac damage, increased risk of cancer) as essential information for decision making. Also a design of a leaflet was made. CONCLUSION: This study identified information about treatment options in dcSSc that should be addressed with patients. Our results can be used to develop effective patient information. SAGE Publications 2021-09-08 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8922679/ /pubmed/35382449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Spierings, Julia
Nienhuis, Hilde
van Lieshout, Eva
van Laar, Jacob M
Pieterse, Arwen H
Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title_full Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title_fullStr Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title_full_unstemmed Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title_short Information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A Delphi consensus study
title_sort information preferences about treatment options in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a delphi consensus study
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23971983211043311
work_keys_str_mv AT spieringsjulia informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy
AT nienhuishilde informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy
AT vanlieshouteva informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy
AT vanlaarjacobm informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy
AT pietersearwenh informationpreferencesabouttreatmentoptionsindiffusecutaneoussystemicsclerosisadelphiconsensusstudy