Cargando…

Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing longevity of the world’s population, with an unprecedented rise in the number of people who need palliative care (PC), there has been sparse research regarding palliative care for older people, especially when it comes to comparison of PC between healthcare systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahlström, Gerd, Huang, Hongli, Luo, Yu, Bökberg, Christina, Rasmussen, Birgit H., Persson, Eva I., Xue, Lian, Cai, Le, Tang, Pingfen, Persson, Magnus, Huang, Jingjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7
_version_ 1784669584128737280
author Ahlström, Gerd
Huang, Hongli
Luo, Yu
Bökberg, Christina
Rasmussen, Birgit H.
Persson, Eva I.
Xue, Lian
Cai, Le
Tang, Pingfen
Persson, Magnus
Huang, Jingjing
author_facet Ahlström, Gerd
Huang, Hongli
Luo, Yu
Bökberg, Christina
Rasmussen, Birgit H.
Persson, Eva I.
Xue, Lian
Cai, Le
Tang, Pingfen
Persson, Magnus
Huang, Jingjing
author_sort Ahlström, Gerd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing longevity of the world’s population, with an unprecedented rise in the number of people who need palliative care (PC), there has been sparse research regarding palliative care for older people, especially when it comes to comparison of PC between healthcare systems and cultures. The aim of this systematic scoping review was to identify the characteristics of the body of literature and to examine the knowledge gaps concerning PC research for older people (> 60 years) in two healthcare systems and cultures, mainland China and Sweden. METHODS: The guidelines PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews), and PICOS (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome) were used. Empirical studies on patients 60 years or older, next of kin or staff participating in a palliative care intervention or setting were included. They were conducted in mainland China or in Sweden during 2007–2019, were published in English and were extracted from seven databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Two independent researchers conducted the selection of studies, data extraction and methodological evaluation. Any disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. The analysis was manifest directed content analysis based on PICOS domains. RESULTS: Of the 15 studies, four were from mainland China and 11 from Sweden. Both countries included older patients with cancer but also other end-stage diseases such as heart failure and dementia. The studies differed in design, method and the content of the interventions. The study in China based on traditional Chinese medicine concerns traditional Chinese folk music. The six qualitative studies from Sweden were evaluations of five interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high age of the participating patients, there was no focus on an ageing perspective concerning palliative care. To adapt to the changes taking place in most societies, future research should have increased focus on older persons’ need for palliative care and should take account of issues concerning research ethics, ethnicity and culture. REGISTERED IN PROSPERO: CRD42020078685, available from. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8922883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89228832022-03-23 Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review Ahlström, Gerd Huang, Hongli Luo, Yu Bökberg, Christina Rasmussen, Birgit H. Persson, Eva I. Xue, Lian Cai, Le Tang, Pingfen Persson, Magnus Huang, Jingjing BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing longevity of the world’s population, with an unprecedented rise in the number of people who need palliative care (PC), there has been sparse research regarding palliative care for older people, especially when it comes to comparison of PC between healthcare systems and cultures. The aim of this systematic scoping review was to identify the characteristics of the body of literature and to examine the knowledge gaps concerning PC research for older people (> 60 years) in two healthcare systems and cultures, mainland China and Sweden. METHODS: The guidelines PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews), and PICOS (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome) were used. Empirical studies on patients 60 years or older, next of kin or staff participating in a palliative care intervention or setting were included. They were conducted in mainland China or in Sweden during 2007–2019, were published in English and were extracted from seven databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Two independent researchers conducted the selection of studies, data extraction and methodological evaluation. Any disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. The analysis was manifest directed content analysis based on PICOS domains. RESULTS: Of the 15 studies, four were from mainland China and 11 from Sweden. Both countries included older patients with cancer but also other end-stage diseases such as heart failure and dementia. The studies differed in design, method and the content of the interventions. The study in China based on traditional Chinese medicine concerns traditional Chinese folk music. The six qualitative studies from Sweden were evaluations of five interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high age of the participating patients, there was no focus on an ageing perspective concerning palliative care. To adapt to the changes taking place in most societies, future research should have increased focus on older persons’ need for palliative care and should take account of issues concerning research ethics, ethnicity and culture. REGISTERED IN PROSPERO: CRD42020078685, available from. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8922883/ /pubmed/35287635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ahlström, Gerd
Huang, Hongli
Luo, Yu
Bökberg, Christina
Rasmussen, Birgit H.
Persson, Eva I.
Xue, Lian
Cai, Le
Tang, Pingfen
Persson, Magnus
Huang, Jingjing
Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title_full Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title_short Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
title_sort similarities and differences between china and sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ahlstromgerd similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT huanghongli similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT luoyu similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT bokbergchristina similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT rasmussenbirgith similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT perssonevai similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT xuelian similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT caile similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT tangpingfen similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT perssonmagnus similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview
AT huangjingjing similaritiesanddifferencesbetweenchinaandswedenregardingthecorefeaturesofpalliativecareforpeopleaged60orolderasystematicscopingreview